Bar Associations and Human Rights Organizations argue that the Supreme Court should reverse the judgement of the Fifth Circuit and remand this action for review and reconsideration of the violation of Mr. Medellin's Vienna Convention rights in a manner consistent with Avena. In the Avena case, the ICJ definitively interpreted the Vienna Convention as mandating specific procedural relief in the case of Mr. Medellin and fifty other Mexican death row inmates in U.S. prisons who were not informed of their right to seek consular assistance.
|
Amicus Briefing
Brief of Amici Curiae in Medellin v. Dretke
United States Supreme Court, January 25, 2005
Your tax deductible gift can help stop human rights violations and save lives around the world.
Region / Country
Most Viewed
-
June 14, 2018
Africa: Pregnant Girls, Young Mothers Barred from School
-
May 4, 2026
“Start with the Youngest Children”
-
May 1, 2019
China’s Algorithms of Repression
-
February 1, 2024
Asleep at the Wheel
-
May 13, 2015
Tiger Chairs and Cell Bosses