By Jonathan Sugden, Researcher for Turkey at Human Rights Watch
Published in The Financial Times (U.K. edition)
October 15, 2001
Sir, Your newspaper suggested that Human Rights Watch had not fully appreciated the momentousness of Turkey's recent constitutional changes ("Turkey approves reforms to ease curbs on human rights", October 4). Human Rights Watch will loudly welcome genuine reform in Turkey whenever it happens - but it has not happened yet.
|
Events in the 48 hours after the constitutional changes were passed showed that the term "activities" will be given the widest possible interpretation: a journalist was sentenced to 20 months' imprisonment and a magazine was shut down; a book by a Kurdish writer was banned; a local Kurdish politician was detained; trade unionists were indicted for preparing invitations to a meeting in the Turkish and Kurdish languages; and Turkish Human Rights Association members were detained while making a public call for the release of Yvonne Ridley, the British journalist, from Afghanistan.
You suggest that these changes were designed "to help Turkey meet the European Union's political criteria". In fact, they were meant to cover the embarrassment of a government that has wasted another year of its European Union candidacy without fulfilling its commitments on human rights and democracy.



