August 10, 2009

VI. Behaviors Leading to Beatings

Students are beaten in schools for infractions ranging from minor misbehavior like speaking out in class to major violations such as fighting. While corporal punishment is never appropriate, it is particularly illegitimate when used as a disproportionate, angry response to minor infractions that might be expected from any child. Even in cases where students commit serious infractions, corporal punishment is not an effective method of redressing the problem.

Students with disabilities are also punished for behavior that stems from their disability itself. Students with disabilities-like all students-deserve tailored discipline programs that teach them appropriate behaviors and allow them to thrive. When they are punished for behaviors connected to their disabilities, they are subjected to particularly harsh discipline and unfairly denied access to quality education.

Misbehaviors Leading to Corporal Punishment

Most instances of corporal punishment reported to the ACLU and Human Rights Watch were for minor infractions, such as having a shirt untucked, being tardy (late to class or to school), or talking in class or in the hallway.[107] A superintendent in a district that uses corporal punishment noted that the practice is particularly egregious if used for minor misbehavior: "I hate to think that a child gets three or five swats for being late to class, I hate to think that a child gets three or five swats for running in the hall-those are minor infractions."[108]

Students in the early grades receive corporal punishment for behavior typical among young children. This is especially problematic for some students with disabilities, who can have trouble learning appropriate social behaviors.[109] Cynthia C., the mother of a boy with congenital brain abnormalities and developmental delays, noted that when he was six and seven, her son received corporal punishment at his Georgia elementary school for "screaming and kicking."[110] Young students with sickle cell anemia in Tennessee were paddled for forgetting forms or avoiding classwork.[111]

Corporal Punishment for Serious Offenses, including Violence

Some students we interviewed were subjected to corporal punishment for serious infractions, including fighting.[112] A serious disciplinary response is clearly appropriate in such circumstances, and very limited force may be used solely to protect the child or others.[113] Corporal punishment goes far beyond permissible force; it uses a violent technique to respond to violent misbehavior, ultimately reinforcing rather than changing the student's behavior. Research suggests that corporal punishment is linked to increased rates of aggression in school in the months and years following the punishment.[114] The ACLU and Human Rights Watch found that students with disabilities were among those beaten for violent misbehavior. One special education teacher in Mississippi observed, "I see these autistic children who get in fights and then get paddled. So you're supposed to teach them not to hit by hitting them."[115] Andrea N., the mother of a 10-year-old with ADHD, reports that her son was paddled for fighting, in violation of her expressed wishes.[116]  

Corporal punishment as a response to violence can be particularly ineffective for certain students with disabilities, especially where those students learn to model violent or self-protective behavior as a consequence of being beaten themselves. Tom R. noted that his son, a Mississippi boy with obsessive compulsive disorder and bipolar disorder, does not see corporal punishment as a deterrent: "With my son, it's not 'I did this, this is my consequence so I better correct my behavior.' It's 'I did this and it's wrong and now they hate me. Now they're going to beat me and I'm going to protect myself.'"[117]Johnny McPhail, the father of a Mississippi girl with autism, felt paddling was extremely detrimental: "An autistic child never forgets a paddling. They have total recall, programming needs to be the same. If you hit her, she'd be hitting, it's hard to talk her out of it."[118]

Punishment for Consequences of Disability

The ACLU and Human Rights Watch received numerous reports of students who were punished for the consequences of their disability. Many of the cases involved students with autism, who were physically punished for exhibiting behaviors common to children on the autism spectrum. Some parents reported that school staff did not take their children's conditions under consideration when administering discipline. Students are being beaten for behavior they simply cannot control, or cannot reasonably be expected to control, a grossly disproportionate and fundamentally demeaning response to the child's condition.

For instance, students with Tourette Syndrome, a condition that causes involuntary vocal and physical tics,[119] may be punished in part because of those tics. Anna M., whose son with autism and Tourette Syndrome was repeatedly punished, observed that "[My son] fought back, he had loud vocalizations, those were his tics. They kept restraining him. They dragged him down the hallway."[120]Michelle R. noted that her son's Tourette Syndrome induces physical tics:

One of his tics was balling up his fists ... that was seen as aggression and he would get in trouble with it ... He would try to explain that it was a tic, and he couldn't control it, but they see that as him escalating it. So now they have him in restraints and then they're giving him sedatives and calling for me to come pick him up. They had a closet and he would go in there and that's where he was hit.[121]

Jennifer Parker, an advocate who works with more than 750 school-age sickle cell patients in Mississippi, Tennessee, and Arkansas through a hospital clinic, observed that many of her patients are paddled for minor infractions directly related to their disability:[122]

Our kids [with sickle cell anemia] are at higher instances of having to repeat grades, or have difficulty with language or processing speed. A lot of our patients can't read, or can't read at grade level. With processing speed, once a teacher gives a direction, the kid might need to hear it multiple times or in different ways. The teacher might get angry when the kid doesn't follow the instructions, and paddles them.[123]

Students were punished for behaviors related to obsessive compulsive disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Tom R. reported that his son with OCD "would erase through a paper and get in trouble for that. It was a manifestation of his obsessive compulsive disorder, and they were punishing him for it."[124] One very young student in Texas, a three-year-old boy with ADHD attending a public pre-kindergarten program, was beaten and bruised during paddling.[125] He was paddled for taking off his shoes and for playing with an air conditioner.[126] The child sustained bruises to his hips that reached around to his navel.[127]

US federal law is not clear as to whether corporal punishment administered for conduct resulting from a student's disabilities is permissible.[128] The Rehabilitation Act of 1973[129] and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)[130] prohibit discrimination against people with disabilities, including students; discipline for conduct that is a manifestation of disability may rise to the level of discrimination.[131] However, the Office for Civil Rights at the US Department of Education, which enforces the Rehabilitation Act and the ADA, has issued regulations which do not expressly prohibit corporal punishment.[132]

Students with Conditions on the Autism Spectrum

According to our interviews, students with autism, especially very young students, were physically punished for exhibiting behaviors commonly manifested by children on the autism spectrum. Students with autism often have difficulty with "normal" school behavior or socialization, as "[t]he regression, or failure to progress, affects language, play, and social interaction and occasionally other skills."[133] Common behaviors stemming from the condition may include physical and verbal aggression, repetitive talking on a favorite theme, stubborn resistance, and the constant asking of the same questions.[134] The Committee on Educational Interventions for Children With Autism of the National Research Council notes that "[s]ocial dysfunction is perhaps the most central defining feature of autism and related conditions, so it is critical that the effects of a child's social disability on behavior be considered."[135]

Despite this medical and scientific evidence, the ACLU and Human Rights Watch received numerous reports of children with autism who were punished because of their behavior. Sharon H., the mother of a girl with autism in Georgia, described her daughter's experience: "One time, she was just sitting, rocking side-by-side in the gym. That's what autistic kids do. She was five at the time. The fourth-grade teacher grabbed her and dragged her across the floor."[136] Another kindergarten girl with autism in Georgia was thrown into a wall after she started rocking and spinning at the same time.[137]

An Oklahoma boy with Asperger's Syndrome, a form of high-functioning autism, was paddled when he was five years old. His grandmother observed that the punishment was meted out as a direct result of her grandson exhibiting behavior normal for his condition:

Kids on the autism spectrum are very sensitive to noise and external stimulation. He was spinning, turning around in the middle of the floor with his arms out. A little girl walked into his hands. The principal said he'd hit her, and spanked him for it.[138]

When Karen W. went to collect her son Brian-a boy with autism-from his first day at a new school in Arkansas, she found him outside screaming, being held down by two staff members, with injuries including scratches and a split lip. Brian, who was eight years old at the time, had been restrained following minor misbehaviors associated with his condition: "the school said he wouldn't keep his shoes on, wanted to play outside, wouldn't stay where he was supposed to stay. This is a child with autism, completely outside of his normal routine."[139]

Parents reported that their students' conditions were not taken into account when educators meted out discipline, despite the fact that those disabilities were routinely discussed with the schools in question. May R., whose daughter with autism was injured during corporal punishment, noted that her teachers "didn't look at her disability, they looked at her behavior."[140] Anna M., whose son with autism was physically punished repeatedly when he was seven years old, noted, "The teacher felt he was doing some stuff on purpose. If you met him, you wouldn't know he was autistic straight away. People thought we were making an excuse for him."[141]

Educators, who face the difficult task of maintaining order in the classroom, may resort to corporal punishment because it is quick to administer, or because the school lacks resources and training for alternative methods of discipline. One teacher pointed out that corporal punishment can be considered "cost-effective. It's free, basically. You don't have to be organized. All you need is a paddle."[142] Logistical or financial obstacles may prevent teachers from using other methods of discipline. One 18-year-old student who was critical of the use of corporal punishment in his rural school district stated that "we couldn't have after school detention. There was no busing. Kids who got detention would have to find another way home."[143] Yet despite the "convenience" of corporal punishment, teachers we interviewed noted that it was ineffective. As a middle school teacher stated: "the immediate impact is to get that student to stop that behavior, but there is no guarantee that it [won't] continue."[144]

Educators may use corporal punishment against students with disabilities in part because they have little to no understanding of the consequences of those disabilities.[145] Parents emphasized that educators lacked the training needed to understand students' disabilities. For instance, Tom R., a Mississippi father of a boy with disabilities, noted that "there's a total lack of regulation regarding training, and a lack of connection."[146] Jennifer Parker, an advocate who works with students with disabilities, found that training can help: "We do some educational outreach. We provide the school with brochures, and with documents from [the hospital], medical records, clinic notes, etc. ... We're exchanging a lot of information between school districts and the hospital. I think this helps teachers understand."[147]

[107] Human Rights Watch/ACLU, A Violent Education, "IV. Offenses Leading to Corporal Punishment."

[108] Human Rights Watch interview with a superintendent of a mid-sized urban district in the Mississippi Delta, December 12, 2007.

[109] For example, students with autism often have trouble with "normal" school behavior or socialization, as "[t]he regression, or failure to progress, affects language, play, and social interaction and occasionally other skills." Lorna Wing, "The Autistic Spectrum," The Lancet, vol. 350 no. 9093, December 13, 1997, pp. 1761-1766.

[110] ACLU telephone interview with Cynthia C.,Georgia, May 22, 2009.

[111] ACLU telephone interview with Jennifer Parker, Tennessee, March 10, 2009.

[112] Human Rights Watch/ACLU, A Violent Education, "IV. Offenses Leading to Corporal Punishment."

[113] Under human rights law, in "exceptional circumstances ... dangerous behavior [may justify] the use of reasonable restraint," but that force must be the minimum amount necessary for the shortest period of time, and must never be used to punish.UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 8, para. 15 (commenting on the Convention on the Rights of the Child, arts. 19, 28(2), and 37).

[114] "Corporal Punishment in Schools: Position Paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine," Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 32, 2003, p. 388 ("punished children become more rebellious and are more likely to demonstrate vindictive behavior"); UN General Assembly, Report of the independent expert for the United Nations study on violence against children, World Report on Violence against Children,Paulo Pinheiro, Independent Expert, A/61/299, August 29, 2006, http://www.violencestudy.org/IMG/pdf/English.pdf (accessed July 31, 2009) , p.132 (reviewing North American studies that have found a direct correlation between abusive behavior from educators and the prevalence of violence or bullying among children).

[115] Human Rights Watch interview with Michelle R. (pseudonym), Hinds County, Mississippi, December 8, 2007 (interviewed with Tom R. (pseudonym), spouse).

[116] Human Rights Watch interview with Andrea N. (pseudonym), Grapeland, Texas, February 28, 2008.

[117] Human Rights Watch interview with Tom R. (pseudonym), December 8, 2007.

[118] Human Rights Watch interview with Johnny McPhail, Oxford, Mississippi, December 14, 2007.

[119] National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, "Tourette Syndrome Fact Sheet," http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/tourette/detail_tourette.htm (accessed June 10, 2009) ("Tourette Syndrome (TS) is a neurological disorder characterized by repetitive, stereotyped, involuntary movements and vocalizations called tics.").

[120] ACLU telephone interview with Anna M., Florida, March 9, 2009

[121] Human Rights Watch interview with Michelle R. (pseudonym), Mississippi, December 8, 2007.

[122] The University of Maryland Medical Center notes that a complication in sickle cell patients is that "the misshapen cells can block the major blood vessels that supply the brain with oxygen.Any interruption in the flow of blood and oxygen to the brain can result in devastating neurological impairment." University of Maryland Medical Center, http://www.umm.edu/blood/sickle.htm(accessed June 2, 2009).

[123] ACLU telephone interview with Jennifer Parker, Tennessee, March 10, 2009.

[124] Human Rights Watch interview with Tom R. (pseudonym), Mississippi, December 8, 2007.

[125] The program was run at the local elementary school and governed by the school district policy on discipline. Early Childhood Center, "Student-Parent Handbook, 2007-2008," [name of location withheld], on file with Human Rights Watch (referring to the [name withheld] School District Student Code of Conduct, on file with Human Rights Watch).

[126] ADHD includes three groups of behavior symptoms: inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. Symptoms of ADHD include having a very hard time paying attention; inability to stay seated; squirming and fidgeting; and acting and speaking without thinking. American Academy of Pediatrics, "Parenting Corner Q&A: ADHD," http://www.aap.org/publiced/BR_ADHD.htm (accessed June 10, 2009) (listing symptoms of ADHD).

[127] Human Rights Watch interview with an attorney in private practice representing Heather P. (mother of the three-year-old boy), rural Texas, February 26, 2008.

[128] The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act prohibits expulsions or significant suspensions ("changes of placement") for conduct that is a manifestation of disability. 20 U.S.C. 1415 (k), 34 C.F.R. sec. 300.530. However, IDEA does not necessarily apply to in-class discipline or other discipline that does not amount to a change in placement. It therefore does not effectively prohibit corporal punishment for conduct that is a manifestation of a child's disability. See, for example, Cole by Cole v. Greenfield-Central Community Sch., 657 F.Supp. 56, 58-59 (S.D. Ind. 1986) (student with disabilities "is not entitled to any unique exemptions or protections from a school's normal disciplinary procedures regarding corporal punishment because of his handicap."); B.A.L. v. Apple, No.00-0068-C-B/G, 2001 WL 1135024, *6 (S.D. Ind. Sep. 21, 2001) (Same).

[129] Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. sec.794, states: "No otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States ... shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance."

[130] 42 U.S.C. secs. 12131 et seq.

[131] Courts are mixed in their analysis of whether adverse actions directed against individuals for manifestations of their disabilities are prohibited discrimination (1) "because of" disability (disparate treatment), (2) a failure to accommodate the known aspects of a disability, or (3) application of neutral policies that have the effect of discriminating against individuals with disabilities (disparate impact). The majority of cases considering the issue occur in the employment area. Some have concluded that adverse action for manifestations are prohibited under one or more of these theories. See Teahan v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad, 951 F.2d 511, 516 (2d Cir. 1991) (a plaintiff satisfies the "solely by reason of" handicap requirement of the Rehabilitation Act by showing that the employer "justifies termination based on conduct caused by the handicap."); Den Hartog v. Wasatch Academy, 129 F.3d 1076, 1087 (10th Cir. 1997) (under disparate impact theory under the ADA, "certain levels of disability-caused conduct [] have to be tolerated or accommodated.") The majority view in US federal courts, however, holds that people with disabilities can be subjected to adverse action, sometimes concluding that the action was taken not because of the disability but due to the conduct, or that in light of the conduct, in the employment realm, the employee was not qualified for the position because of the conduct. SeeCheryl L. Anderson, "What Is 'Because of the Disability' under the Americans with Disabilities Act? Reasonable Accommodation, Causation, and the Windfall Doctrine," Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, vol. 27, 2006, p. 323; Kelly Cahill Timmons, "Accommodating Misconduct Under the Americans with Disabilities Act," Florida Law Review, vol. 57, 2005, p. 208 (noting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) as defining certain mental impairments as "likely to manifest themselves in the form of [mis]conduct", and discussing cases).

[132] See34 C.F.R. sec. 104.33 (the regulations focus on denial of a free appropriate public education (FAPE) as the discrimination prohibited by these statutes). Courts interpreting the Rehabilitation Act and the ADA have concluded that manifestation determinations are not required for discipline under these statutes.See M.G. et al. v. Chrisfield, et al., 547 F.Supp.2d 399, 419-20 (D.N.J. 2008); Centennial Sch. Dist. v. Phil L. and Lori L., ex rel. Matthew L., 559 F.Supp.2d 634 (E.D. Pa. 2008) (Parents failed to exhaust administrative remedies under IDEA, and Rehabilitation Act did not mandate that district provide student pre-expulsion manifestation hearing).  "A manifestation determination is a creature of statute; specifically, the IDEA, not the Rehabilitation Act." Ibid., 559 F. Supp.2d at 645. But see Ron J. ex rel. R.J. v. McKinney Indep. Sch. Dist., No. 05-257, 2006 WL 2927446, at *4 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 11, 2006) (comparing a Rehabilitation Act hearing and a manifestation determination under IDEA and finding that "there is little difference in what would have been presented").

[133] Wing, "The Autistic Spectrum," The Lancet, pp. 1761-1766.

[134] Ibid.

[135] National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Educational Interventions for Children With Autism, Catherine Lord and James McGee, eds., Educating Children With Autism (Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001) p. 27.

[136] ACLU telephone interview with Sharon H., Georgia, March 9, 2009.

[137] ACLU telephone interview with Theresa E., who observed the incident, Georgia, March 5, 2009.

[138] ACLU telephone interview with Sarah P. (pseudonym), Oklahoma, May 22, 2009.

[139] ACLU telephone interview with Karen W., Arkansas, May 22, 2009.

[140] ACLU telephone interview with May R. (pseudonym), Florida, April 16, 2009.

[141] ACLU telephone interview with Anna M., Florida, March 9, 2009.

[142] Human Rights Watch interview with Elizabeth Savage, former teacher in the Mississippi Delta, New Orleans, Louisiana, December 9, 2007.

[143] Human Rights Watch interview with Sean D. (pseudonym), Oxford, Mississippi, December 14, 2007.

[144] Human Rights Watch interview with Brad G. (pseudonym), middle school teacher, Mississippi Delta, December 12, 2007.

[145] Similar scenarios have been studied in the context of parental physical punishment, where research suggests that parents of children with communication problems may resort to physical discipline because of frustration over what they perceive as intentional failure to respond to verbal guidance, or where children's behavioral characteristics may become frustrating. Roberta Hibbard, Larry Desch, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, and American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Children With Disabilities, "Maltreatment of children with disabilities," Pediatrics, vol. 199 no. 5, May 2007, p. 1020.

[146] Human Rights Watch interview with Tom R. (pseudonym), Mississippi, December 8, 2007.

[147] ACLU telephone interview with Jennifer Parker, Tennessee, March 10, 2009.