<<previous | index | next>> IV. Workplace Abuses in Malaysia
Indonesian migrant domestic workers in Malaysia encounter a wide range of human rights abuses in the workplace, including extremely long hours of work without overtime pay; no rest days; incomplete and irregular payment of wages; psychological, physical, and sexual abuse; poor living conditions; restrictions on their freedom of movement and ability to practice their religion; and in some cases, trafficking into situations of forced labor.91Conditions of confinement, workers lack of information about or access to institutions that could provide assistance, and employers government-sanctioned practices of confiscating workers passports present formidable challenges that often prevent women domestic workers from reporting abuses, obtaining help, or even escaping. The lack of monitoring by any independent or government agency compounds these abuses by creating an environment where employers and labor agents face little or no accountability for their treatment of women migrant domestic workers. Many abuses likely go unreported, but NGOs and the Indonesian Ministry of Manpower and Transmigration estimate that roughly eighteen thousand to twenty-five thousand migrants return to Indonesia each year from Malaysia and other destination countries having experienced some form of abuse.92 These estimates mostly derive from returning migrants who pass through the international airport in Jakarta, leaving the true numbers of abuse cases unknown. A leader from a consortium of migrants rights NGOs in Jakarta commented, Four to eight hundred migrants arrive each day [at the airport]. Sometimes there are twelve rape victims in one week, like in November 2003. In 2002, 12 percent of returning migrants reported problems, and 2 percent were ill.93 Several other groups have documented abuses against Indonesian migrant workers. Perkumpulan Panca Karsa (PPK), an NGO on the island of Lombok, comes into contact with both documented and undocumented returning migrants, who may have returned by boat or by plane. PPK handled 450 cases of abuse and labor rights violations in 2003.94 Human Rights Watch interviewed a Malaysian labor supplier who said, I bring about fifty maids to Malaysia each month, and [of those,] there are usually one or two [who have abusive employers].95 In 2003, 753 Indonesian migrant workers ran away from their employers and took shelter at the Indonesian embassy in Kuala Lumpur. The numbers who seek refuge at the Indonesian embassy have increased each year and the majority of those seeking assistance are women.96 Hours of Work, Rest Days, and Workload
Indonesian domestic workers employed in Malaysia typically work sixteen to eighteen hour days, seven days a week, without any holidays. Most have no significant time to rest during the day, although some are able to take one-hour breaks in the afternoon. Indonesian domestic workers who cared for children in addition to their cleaning responsibilities reported being on call around the clock, as in the case of Susanti, who told Human Rights Watch:
A domestic workers typical workload included cooking three meals a day; cleaning the house, including mopping, vacuuming, cleaning windows, and dusting; taking care of children, including bathing them, tutoring them, feeding them, preparing them for school, playing with them, and putting them to sleep; washing the car every day; washing the entire households clothes by hand; and ironing. Amsia Widodo told Human Rights Watch:
As noted above, most labor contracts Human Rights Watch obtained or those described to us by labor agents and Malaysian government officials allow domestic workers to have one day off per week, but this could be bypassed if they were paid for all seven days. With only a few exceptions, the domestic workers Human Rights Watch interviewed had fixed monthly salaries and worked every single day without rest. These workers typically did not receive their full salary; none reported receiving any extra payment for working every day of the week. The contracts Human Rights Watch obtained failed to stipulate the number of hours that domestic workers should work each day. There is no provision for overtime pay or for vacation days in these contracts or for domestic workers under Malaysian employment laws. The employers and labor agents whom we interviewed defended these policies, often claiming that domestic workers did not know how to rest, and they could not be given a day off because they would get pregnant or bring foreign men to the house. One labor agent explained to Human Rights Watch that if he received a complaint about excessive workload, he would simply explain to the employer that pushing the worker beyond eighteen hours per day would lead her to leave, harming the employers self interest:
Forced Confinement and Restricted Communication
Domestic workers, labor agents, and employers all reported that domestic workers confront restrictions on their freedom of movement and their freedom of association. Employers typically forbid domestic workers from going outside of the house on their own. Aside from some women who accompanied their employers to the market or on family outings, most were confined to the house or apartment building where they worked. Some women reported being locked in their employers homes from the outside. Many of these homes have electronic surveillance systems and the apartment buildings are in gated communities with security, making it difficult for women to leave even when their employers were out. Latifah Dewi, a twenty-year-old domestic worker who escaped from her employers house said, There is an autolock for the front gate and if someone jumps over the gate, the alarm should ring . The employer had told me not to run because the house has a camera and alarm. The employer made me afraid but I wanted to run away.100 In addition to restrictions on their freedom of movement, domestic workers are often forbidden from contacting friends or family, using the telephone, writing letters, or speaking to their neighbors. One woman who was not allowed to go outside and who had relatives living in Malaysia remembered, My family sent me their phone number, but my employer kept it and did not give it to me. I cried inside. My father sent the addresses of my family in Malaysia, but my employer kept it and only gave it to me when I returned to Indonesia. I never visited my relatives in Malaysia. My family thought I had died.101 Seventeen-year-old Firuza Suprapto told Human Rights Watch,
Restrictions on women domestic workers freedom of movement and their communication with family, friends, and neighbors have several negative consequences. In addition to violating their rights under national and international human rights law, these restrictions made it difficult for them to seek help. Furthermore, they deepened the social isolation of domestic workers, who told Human Rights Watch of their loneliness and depression. Salma Wati, a thirty-four-year-old domestic worker in Kuala Lumpur said:
Human Rights Watch interviewed labor agents, employers, and government officials who claimed that if women had days off or were allowed to roam independently outside of the house, they would either run away or get pregnant. One labor agent said that There is no reason for a maid to have a passport. She could run away, get involved in criminal activities like stealing.104 Most had stereotypes of Indonesian domestic workers as naïve, gullible, or promiscuous. One employer explained:
Unpaid Wages
Of the fifty-one domestic workers that Human Rights Watch interviewed, twenty-six did not receive their full salary, twelve received no salary at all, and most of the remaining were still working and hoping to get their salary after they finished their two-year contracts. In many situations where domestic workers received no salary, the lack of wages combined with other factors, such as deception, amounted to trafficking into forced labor. The legal section later in the report provides the legal definition of trafficking in persons. One common ploy employers use to prevent domestic workers from running away or to cheat them out of their full salary is to give them their salary only at the end of the two-year contract. One labor agent commented, This is because there are runaway cases, and it is protection for the employer.106 Most defended this practice as a strategy for helping domestic workers to save money for their families. Instead of giving domestic workers their salary on a monthly basis, employers commonly tell workers they are depositing the earnings in a separate savings account for the woman worker. Indonesian domestic workers must leave Malaysia upon completion of their contract, and if they do not receive their full salary before their departure, they have little chance of claiming it from Indonesia. Many of the returned domestic workers that Human Rights Watch interviewed in Indonesia reported they never received their full salary, as in the case of Amina Ipah:
Most of the currently employed domestic workers that Human Rights Watch interviewed were unaware if they had a savings account in their name, none held passbooks or other bank records, and several reported they were denied permission to withdraw any portion of their savings to send to their families in Indonesia. Hartini Sukarman said, I never got my monthly salary, and I never sent any money home. I just got a check at the end. Sometimes I would want to take my salary, but they didnt give it to me. The employers would ask, What for? You dont have to go outside.108 Indonesian domestic workers with little education were unable to calculate the full payment they were entitled to and were cheated out of their salaries. Dija Susilo had an arrangement to receive 370 ringgit per month after an initial four-month withholding of pay. After two years of work, she should have earned 7,400 ringgit [U.S.$1947.37], but instead her employers gave her 2,000 ringgit [U.S.$526.31]. She told Human Rights Watch that when she returned to Indonesia, the labor agency checked and said I should have gotten more money . I didnt know I had more money, I only learned that after I came back, when the company told me.109 In other cases, the employer deducted the cost of any purchased supplies, medicines, and phone calls during the two-year period. In some cases, the employer gave the workers salary to the labor agent instead of the worker directly. In these arrangements, many workers were denied their full salaries. A resident in the shelter at the Indonesian embassy observed:
The tactic of withholding payment of wages until the completion of the two-year contract also deters women workers from escaping abusive conditions, as they know there is little chance they will be able to successfully claim their wages once they leave. They often face extreme pressure to bring money back home with them to Indonesia. Salma Wati, a domestic worker in Kuala Lumpur said:
Restrictions on Religious Freedom
Almost one third of the domestic workers that Human Rights Watch interviewed reported that they were unable to practice their religion freely. Most of the women were Muslim and were not allowed to pray five times a day or to fast during the month of Ramadan. Some were forced to handle pork, considered unclean and forbidden, or to touch dogs, which is also considered unclean and shunned by many of the women we spoke with. Some reported that labor agents confiscated their Koran and other prayer materials before their arrival. Christian women said their employers denied them permission to leave the house to attend church. As one woman said, There is a part of the agreement where we can choose the type of job, and as a Muslim, it is written that we dont have to handle pork. In the agreement, you are allowed to do prayer, but actually you are not allowed to. When I was working I was not allowed to pray or to fast.112 Recent proposals to place Muslim workers with Muslim families would not remedy this problem, as Human Rights Watch interviewed workers who were prevented from praying and fasting by Muslim and non-Muslim employers alike. Similarly, there were non-Muslim employers who respected their employees religious freedom. One returned domestic worker, Ulfah Aisyah, said, My employers didnt allow me to fast or to take breaks to pray, even though they were Muslim. I was very hurt that they didnt let me pray.113 Physical Abuse, Neglect, and Mistreatment
Almost half of the women Human Rights Watch interviewed suffered some form of psychological, physical, or sexual abuse. If one includes restrictions on movement or prohibitions on practicing ones religion, almost all interviewees experienced some form of abuse (see appendix E). Of the fifty-one domestic workers interviewed, eighteen experienced verbal abuse, nine experienced physical abuse, and seven experienced sexual harassment and abuse. Physical abuse ranged from being punched and kicked to severe beatings requiring hospitalization. Several of the women that Human Rights Watch interviewed still bore the scars of this abuse, including burns, bruises, scars, and swollen body parts. Many reported that their beatings came after mistakes in their work, but as one NGO worker in Indonesia put it, Just because a migrant worker burns a shirt with an iron by accident, it doesnt mean the employer should burn the worker with the iron as a punishment.114 Twenty-seven-year-old Arianti Harikusumo said:
Women domestic workers typically had no access to health care if they sustained injuries after beatings. The women who received medical care did so only after running away or being removed from the house by the police in response to phone calls made by neighbors. For example, women who escaped to the Indonesian embassy were provided with free medical care, an essential service. Even at the embassy, however, psychological counseling services were unavailable. Abuse also took the form of denial of food, sleep deprivation, and forcing women to sleep in uncomfortable places, including on the floor, in bathrooms, and on staircases. Arianti Harikusumo, an exceptionally thin woman who appeared severely undernourished, said:
Verbal abuse usually consisted of harsh insults, threats to the woman worker, and belittlement. Tita Sari said her employer, would threaten me and called me names. She said, Im not afraid if I have to kill you.117 In the context of heavy workloads and long working hours, employers often intensified the stress and pressure that a worker felt by constantly shouting and scolding. Many incessantly criticized the quality of the work, forcing the domestic worker to redo it. The threats and insults were often accompanied by physical abuse. Ulfah Aisyah, a twenty-five-year-old returned domestic worker, remembered,
Sexual Abuse and Harassment
Human Rights Watch interviewed seven women who had been sexually harassed or assaulted by their employers. Of these, only three had reported this abuse to an NGO or the Indonesian embassy and had received any health care. An eighth woman was raped and became pregnant by a male migrant worker also working for her employer. The violence ranged from groping and fondling to repeated rape. Women survivors of violence typically were unable to see a health care provider until after they left the workplace, and in several of the cases, they had not yet received medical care or been tested for sexually transmitted infections at the time of the interview. In several instances, men would try to buy sexual services from women domestic workers. One woman reported,
The women domestic workers who reported sexual abuse said that they were afraid to run away because of threats made by the employer or because of the pressure they felt to complete the first few months of their contract in which their salary was withheld to pay for their transportation and placement fees. Nur Hasana Firmansyah, a twenty-one-year-old returned domestic worker, said that her employer fondled her, hugged her, offered to pay her money for sex, and came into her bed at night and tried to touch her. She told Human Rights Watch that her employer, checked my bag and looked for important numbers to make sure I was not calling for help. The lady didnt know. I was afraid to tell her because the man was threatening me, dont tell my wife or you will see . Since I knew I had to pay back three months of salary, I tried to withstand it.120 Human Rights Watch interviewed some domestic workers who endured abuse for the initial three or four months of employment in order to pay off their debt before they escaped. Nur Hasana Firmansyah, part of whose story is recounted above, left her employers household after completing three months of work, and returned to Indonesia without any earnings. Susanti Pramono, whose experience in Malaysia is described at the beginning of this section, felt pressure to complete three months of employment and pay off her debt before she informed her female employer that the male employer raped her every day. Several of the women reported that they received hostile reactions if they finally turned to the female employer for help. Some employers blamed the worker, as in Nyatun Wulandaris experience. She told Human Rights Watch, The sons would always touch me, they would call me a pig . Whenever the elder son saw me he touched me all over my body. While I was sleeping, the employers son came into the room. He wanted to have sex with me. I yelled. The lady employer was angry with me. The next day she gave me a ticket to Indonesia.121 Several other domestic workers shared the experience of being immediately sent back to Indonesia once they reported the harassment and abuse. Some received their wages, others did not. Trafficking into Forced Labor
The use of coercive tactics, fraud, or deception to trap individuals into forced labor falls under the international definition of trafficking in persons. Human Rights Watch interviewed nine women and girls who were trafficked into forced labor. These women were often promised jobs in domestic work but ended up working in restaurants, retail stores, or food stalls without any payment of wages. In other cases, they were promised other forms of employment but ended up as domestic workers, again without payment. One twenty-three-year-old trafficking victim, Harmeni Sudjatmoko, said that, The sponsor cheated me. I can do massage. He promised me I could work as a masseuse in Malaysia, but instead I worked as a maid.122 Atikah Titis employers forced her to make beverages and sell them at the market the entire day, in addition to her responsibilities as a domestic worker. The twenty-one-year-old worker told Human Rights Watch,
The trafficking victims Human Rights Watch interviewed typically suffered severe forms of the workplace abuses described in earlier sections of this report. They reported that employers forced them to work eighteen to twenty hours per day, locked them in their workplace from the outside, prevented them from making phone calls, and failed to pay any wages. These women and girls often confronted daily violence, endured poor living conditions, and received inadequate amounts of food. Employers and agents used threats and violence to keep them trapped in these situations. After nine months of working fifteen to twenty hours a day, sleeping on the floor, and daily beatings, eighteen-year-old Santi Kartika told her employer that she wanted to return to her agency. She told Human Rights Watch, I said I did not want to work for him anymore. That is when he threatened to rape me and prostitute me.124 Human Rights Watch interviewed NGO migrant worker advocates who felt that the Indonesian government could make significant progress in their fight against trafficking by better monitoring the training and holding centers to ensure that recruitment and placement procedures are legal and that women possess full and correct information about their jobs and rights. One trafficking expert noted that the Indonesian authorities should also check the ages of prospective migrant workers and the validity of their travel documents: This would significantly affect the amount of trafficking . No one is doing anything about the falsification of documents. Everyone talks about it. There are a lot of young girls . There are different entry points, holding centers, borders, and consulates. It wouldnt be difficult for police to investigate.125 The Malaysian government does not have a system in place for monitoring the placement of migrant domestic workers. Although the immigration department investigates complaints made by neighbors who suspect abuse, or follows up on cases brought to them by the police, the Indonesian embassy, or NGOs, there are no procedures for tracking whether a woman migrant worker has been placed into the type and conditions of work that she was promised, or whether she has been trafficked into forced labor. The nascent effort to combat trafficking by the Malaysian government and its National Human Rights Commission, SUHAKAM, have focused on women trafficked into forced sex work and, thus far, have done little to identify or provide remedies for women trafficking into other forms of forced labor. [91] Many of these abuses against Indonesian migrant workers in Malaysia and other destination countries have been reported by NGOs in Indonesia to the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Migrants. Indonesian Migrant Workers: Systematic Abuse at Home and Abroad (Jakarta: Komnas Perempuan and Solidaritas Perempuan/CARAM Indonesia, 2002); Indonesian Migrant Workers. See also, Sidney Jones, Making Money off Migrants. [92] Indonesian Migrant Workers, pp. 9-10. Authorities at the international airport in Jakarta estimate that there are four hundred returnees a day (1,650 during major holidays), and about 10 percent return with complaints of abuse. Therefore, NGOs estimate roughly twenty-five thousand migrants return by air with complaints of abuse and the Ministry of Labor has estimated eighteen thousand complaints per year. [93] Human Rights Watch interview with Wahyu Susilo, executive secretary, Konsorsium Pembela Buruh Migran Indonesia (KOPBUMI), Jakarta, Indonesia, January 21, 2004. [94] Human Rights Watch interview with Endang Susilowati, executive director, Perkumpulan Panca Karsa, Mataram, Lombok, Indonesia, January 29, 2004. [95] Human Rights Watch interview with a labor supplier, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, February 13, 2004. [96] Human Rights Watch interview with Jun Kuncoro, attaché, Indonesian Embassy, Kuala Lumpur , Malaysia, February 18, 2004. [97] Human Rights Watch interview with Susanti Pramono, returned domestic worker, Lombok, Indonesia, January 24, 2004. [98] Human Rights Watch interview with Amsia Widodo, returned domestic worker, Lombok, Indonesia, January 26, 2004. [99] Human Rights Watch interview with a labor supplier, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, February 13, 2004. [100] Human Rights Watch interview with Latifah Dewi, domestic worker, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, February 26, 2004. [101] Human Rights Watch interview with Hartini Sukarman, returned domestic worker, Lombok, Indonesia, January 26, 2004. [102] Human Rights Watch interview with Firuza Suprapto, domestic worker, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, February 21, 2004. [103] Human Rights Watch interview with Salma Wati, domestic worker, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, February 18, 2004. [104] Human Rights Watch interview with a labor supplier, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, February 13, 2004. [105] Human Rights Watch interview with an employer, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, February 21, 2004. [106] Human Rights Watch interview with a labor supplier, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, February 13, 2004. [107] Human Rights Watch interview with Amina Ipah, returned domestic worker, Lombok, Indonesia, January 27, 2004. [108] Human Rights Watch interview with Hartini Sukarman, returned domestic worker, Lombok, Indonesia, January 26, 2004. [109] Human Rights Watch interview with Dija Susilo, returned domestic worker, Lombok, Indonesia, January 25, 2004. [110] Human Rights Watch interview with Muriyani Khadijah, domestic worker, Kuala Lumpur , Malaysia, February 26, 2004. [111] Human Rights Watch interview with Salma Wati, domestic worker, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, February 18, 2004. [112] Human Rights Watch interview with Tita Sari, domestic worker, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, February 26, 2004. [113] Human Rights Watch interview with Ulfah Aisyah, returned domestic worker, Lombok, Indonesia, January 27, 2004. [114] Human Rights Watch interview with Dina Nuriyati, chair, FOBMI, Jakarta, Indonesia, January 22, 2004. [115] Human Rights Watch interview with Arianti Harikusumo, domestic worker, Kuala Lumpur , Malaysia, February 25, 2004. [116] Ibid. [117] Human Rights Watch interview with Tita Sari, domestic worker, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, February 26, 2004. [118] Human Rights Watch interview with Ulfah Aisyah, returned domestic worker, Lombok, Indonesia, January 27, 2004. [119] Ibid. [120] Human Rights Watch interview with Nur Hasana Firmansyah, returned domestic worker, Lombok, Indonesia, January 26, 2004. [121] Human Rights Watch interview with Nyatun Wulandari, returned domestic worker, Lombok, Indonesia, January 24, 2004. [122] Human Rights Watch interview with Harmeni Sudjatmoko, domestic worker, Kuala Lumpur, February 26, 2004. [123] Human Rights Watch interview with Atikah Titi, domestic worker, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, February 25, 2004. [124] Human Rights Watch interview with Santi Kartika, domestic worker, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, February 19, 2004. [125] Human Rights Watch interview with Ruth Rosenberg, program manager, Counter Trafficking Project, International Catholic Migration Commission, Jakarta, Indonesia, February 5, 2004.
|