, September 19, 2005
The Road Ahead
From Sam Zarifi:
With all our teams now safely back from the provinces, we had a chance to discuss what we found, to get information from other observers, analysts, and journalists, and to take stock of the post-poll situation.
Afghan election workers take down a polling tent after voting ended on the outskirts of Kabul. (c) 2005 Reuters Limited
Everyone was relieved that elections proceeded so smoothly, with little violence from warlords, and less than expected disruption by the Taliban and other anti-government forces. There is no question these are major achievements for the people of Afghanistan, as well as for the election authorities here.
It is still too early to have exact figures, but it seems certain that the voter turnout yesterday was low, certainly lower than many expected.
FEFA, an NGO with more than 6,000 observers around the country, estimated that turnout was about 35 percent of the registered voters, while the official election oversight body here announced that turnout was an estimated 50 percentas one journalist put it, "the psychologically important 50 percent point." We will know the exact figures later, of course.
We had expected the turnout to be lower compared with the historic presidential elections last year, for a variety of reasons: these were the second elections, and people may be (we hope) getting used to the idea of voting; parliamentary elections get lower turnouts; intimidation by anti-government forces was higher in the south and southeast; the voting system (single nontransferable vote) and absence of political parties gave people a bewildering number of candidates to choose from; the failure to screen out candidates with links to armed groups and records of human rights abuse gave people a choice between candidates who were unknown or notorious, nameless or shameless.
Certainly our monitoring teams encountered a large degree of disenchantment due to the failure of the government to address their needs so far, and its failure to provide candidates who promised to create an effective and accountable parliament. When this parliament sits down for the first time, the Bonn Process is over, and the government of Afghanistanand its international supportersmust contend with the wants and needs of the Afghan people.
Between now and then, of course, there is still significant concern about efforts to disrupt the counting process by the Taliban, and the possibility that candidates will resort to violence to take advantage of the "assassination clause" that allows candidates with lower votes to take the place of higher placed candidates who may pass away of natural or violent causes. This is not the time for the international community to drop our vigilance. If anything, the period between now and October 22, when the final tally is expected to announced, requires greater attention from Afghan and international security forces.
Human Rights Watch will press NATO, in charge of the ISAF forces here, to not pull the extra 2,000 troops they deployed for the elections (perplexingly, NATO has said it will draw down these forces on October 19, exactly when they´re needed most).
All eyes are on the parliament now, and we hope that the Afghan people´s courage, and their trust in the secrecy of the ballot, will end up keeping out the human rights abusers who have made their lives so miserable and electing candidates who represent them and the best interests of the country.
The international media is already getting ready to leave here, and even the modest attention paid to Afghanistan because of these elections will dissipate again. Human Rights Watch will be here, though, working with the network of colleagues and supporters we have developed here, particularly as part of our wide-ranging research on the elections.
All of our team members, including yours truly, are exhausted and exhilarated by our efforts in recent weeks, and by the struggle of the Afghan people to regain a normal life after years of ferocious mayhem.
Afghanistan is one of the poorest countries on the planet, and it will be years before its people can enjoy many of the rights those of us with access to blogs so often take for granted. At least, though, they have clearly indicated their desire to move toward attaining these rights, free of the rule of the gun.
* * * *
There are signs of movement in Afghanistan, most of them in the right direction, but manytoo manynot. We have tried very hard to warn the international community and the central government about the reemergence of rights abusers and the growing problems associated with the behavior of U.S. forces here (unlike in Iraq, American forces here operate under no clear legal frameworkit is entirely unclear what law, whether Afghan, U.S., or international, governs the actions of the U.S. and its coalition partners).
But enough of that. For me at least, the process of traveling through the country while conducting this research was enormously informative because it allowed me to compare Afghanistan today with the way we had found it when we traveled to many of the same areas in February 2002, immediately after the end of the U.S. war to oust the Taliban.
Roads in Kabul now actually have road signs, like No Parking, Stop, and One Way, although they are still honored more in the breach. I asked our driver why he drove straight down a road clearly marked as one-way, and he simply said "because it is the closest route." The road north of Kabul even has a painted median now, the better for drivers to aim their cars straight down the middle of the road.
More significantly, though, the farmlands surrounding this road are now green again, with vendors every few meters selling beautiful, luscious green grapes that are a tonic after a day of dusty interviewing. In 2002, this area was entirely denuded of people, and its once (and currently) ample orchards and vineyards cut down to burnt out stumps by the Taliban as punishment for the area´s support of anti-Taliban forces (and predilection for pressing grapes into wine).
In 1828, when Josiah Harlan, a madcap adventurer who was the first American to visit Afghanistan, came to the Kabul valley, he described the city as "a jewel encircled by emerald." In 2002, a more apt description would have been a burnt out shell in the middle of a dust bowl.
Today, the green is coming back, and Kabul´s famous fruits are available in the markets again. Thousands of Afghans who had sought shelter in Pakistan and Iran have come back to the area, and they are busy tilling the land again. They want nothing more than to tend to their crops, in good health, and give their children a better life than they have had. I hope that our work here helps them in some small way.
From the Afghanistan team, 6:30 PM::
Ok, we're signing off for the day. We'll be back tomorrow with some updates and final analysis on the elections.
Thanks to everyone who logged in.
Update from Sam Zarifi, Kabul, 4:15 PM::
The polls here in Kabul have just officially closed.
I've talked to the teams; each is at a different polling station, watching polling staff seal the ballot boxes and pack up the stations.
The process overall seems to have been free of major violence, although there were some isolated attacks reported. We'll see what further information comes in overnight.
The logistics of the vote seemed to go smoothly as well. The only major problem (which we expected) was that the complexity of the ballots confused a lot of voters, especially illiterate voters. A lot of voters, especially women in rural areas, were confused about the voting process, didn't know how to vote, or didn't have any idea of whom to vote for.
There were also some limited cases of apparent fraud, including cases of under-age voters, some as young as 10 years old.
In any case, the Afghan people, despite their widespread cynicism, showed that they're committed to an electoral process, even if it was flawed.
As Human Rights Watch maintained before the election, most of the problems that plagued this process existed well before the election, and will likely exist after as well--including the underlying environment of fear that exists in Afghanistan's budding political scene. Numerous candidates and voters suffered intimidation by local commanders or insurgent forces in the lead-up to today's vote, and many candidates were afraid to speak or campaign openly. An untold number of people refrained from running for office in this election, because of intimidation by local militia groups or insurgent forces. And an untold number of Afghan didn't vote today, for the same reasons. Yet others were put off by the high number of former commanders on the ballot, some with records of past human rights abuse.
We'll be updating this site tomorrow after we re-analyze our own findings and consult with other monitors and election observers.
Update from Team 6, south of Kandahar, 3:30 PM::
We are just returning from Spin Boldak, which lies to the southeast of Kandahar. We went to two stations there. There weren't too many problems. There were some people there who were trying to vote twice; they had their cards and were trying to vote, but the polling staff didn't let them.
The main issue down here seems to be low turnout. It seems like a lot of people didn't come out to vote. There hasn't been any violence, but it may be that people stayed away from the polls because of fears they would be attacked by insurgent forces.
A man voting in Spin Boldak (c) 2005 Reuters
Update from Sam Zarifi, west of Kabul, 3:15 PM::
We're in Paghman district, which lies just to the west of Kabul. It's very quiet. Nothing much is going on here. There's another hour of voting left, but there are only a couple of people still voting.
There are posters of one single candidate all around--the militia leader Abdul Rabb al Rasul Sayyaf, who is from this district. There is also still some campaigning going on: trucks and vans driving around with pictures of Sayyaf, but otherwise it's very quiet.
A woman voting in Kabul (c) 2005 Reuters
Update from Team 3 in Ghazni, 2:30 PM::
We’re received confirmation of an attack on a polling site this morning. A grenade was reportedly tossed at a site in Andar district, and one polling worker was injured.
Update from Team 4, Kapisa province 2:20 PM::
Just a quick update to say that we've seen a few more under-age voters since the last update. There are definitely some children voting out here. It seems like this is a recurrent problem in some of the villages here, which raises the possibility of there being a fraudulent scheme of some sort.
Update from Sam Zarifi, near Kabul, 2:10 PM::
I've been talking by telephone with all the teams, as well as to other election monitoring teams.
It's difficult to say anything conclusive at this point, but it seems like there is lower turnout than the last election [the presidential election in October 2004].
Yet it's hard to conclude anything: there are more polling stations and booths than last time, which could lead to shorter lines. Still, there is a sense that there have been fewer voters.
Also, the mood is different than during last year's election. There isn't the same excitement as there was last year; people are not as excited about voting or about the election.
Of course, this could be good thing--perhaps people are getting used to the process, and acting like voting is just a normal thing.
But it could also be a reflection of voter disappointment or cynicism about the candidates and the process. We've heard a lot of cynicism from people in the lead-up to these polls.
Our teams have witnessed a lot of complications with the ballot, some of which were expected. The complexity of the ballot has turned out to be a major issue. Many people here are illiterate and simply couldn't handle the ballots. There are pictures and symbols on the ballots, so that people who can't read know which candidate is supposed to be the one they want (that is, if they've chosen someone). But the photos and the symbols on the ballot papers are very small, and some people can't find their candidates. And there are other confusions.
So, regardless of what the specific regulations are, election staff have had to help voters in many areas. This is especially true in the case of women voters. In a few instances, our teams have seen election workers, when helping voters, point to certain candidates, and tell voters to select them. Obviously, this raises concerns about the process. This doesn't seem from our monitoring to be a systematic problem--at least not yet--but it is a cause for concern.
Women voters in Kandahar lining up to vote. (c) 2005 Reuters
Update from Team 1, Jawzjan province, 1:00 PM:
We're in the village of Sayedabad, in Jawzjan district, in northern Afghanistan, to the west of Mazar-e Sharif.
Things are going well generally, but a lot of women don't know how to vote. In a few places, we saw women voters who showed up at the polls and had no idea what to do. They came in, and they asked the polling workers, "What do we do now?" They didn't know how to vote, and didn't have any idea for whom to vote for, so they were asking the polling staff, "Who should we vote for?"
There was a lot of confusion: some of the poll workers were telling them, "You have to decide." But in some cases, the election workers were indicating to the women voters whom to vote for. It's difficult to know what to say about this--these women voters just don't know what to do.
Another issue that caused us some concern is that there was a candidate agent who showed up at a site, with a whole set of women, and was telling them whom to vote for, and they were going in and voting as they were told. But that was just one case.
The real problem was these women voters who didn't know how to vote, or who hadn't any idea whom to vote for. There was a lot of confusion among them. They simple didn't know what they were doing or whom they were voting for.
Update from Team 4, Kapisa province 12:20 PM::
Some good news and some bad.
In some places here things have been going well. But there have been some problems, especially out in the villages. There is a lot of illiteracy out here, and we don't know if everyone really understands what's going on with the ballot papers. There's a lot of confusion among the illiterate voters, not knowing whom to vote for.
And we saw a major problem at one polling station, in the town of Pul-e Mirwais. Some children were apparently voting.
We were leaving the site there, on the way to another polling site, and we saw about 7 or 8 kids--boys--they were only about 10 or 12 years old. They had all voted, and had ink on their fingers [the indelible ink to prevent fraudulent multiple voting].
We asked them, "Did you vote?" And they said, "Yes, we voted."
So we asked the eldest among them, "How old are you?" And he said he was fourteen.
But he wasn't even fourteen. He looked younger than that. And he was the oldest of them. The rest were about 10 years old.
We'll keep an eye out for this in other villages. We have a real worry about this problem. Even the manager of that polling station, where the kids voted, he was only about 18 years old, if that.
The polling staff out here, in these rural areas, are not very reliable. There are some serious problems with voters' knowledge in these villages. These people out here, in these villages, they're illiterate, and they don't really know what's going on with the ballot papers. So they ask the polling staff to help them vote.
They go up to the polling staff, and they say, "I want to vote for so-and-so."
And then the staff points to a line on the ballot and says, "This is the guy." Then the voters vote for that person. But there is a problem here. They might tell the illiterate voters to vote for someone else, whomever they want to. There's a real concern out here that some of these polling staff might be connected to certain candidates. So they might just point to the candidate they support, and say, "This is the guy you want to vote for."
Some voters here have complained to us that the polling staff are linked with local candidates, or local commanders or warlords. If these polling staff are really linked to certain candidates, they might tell the voters to vote for their candidate, while the voter thinks he's voting for someone else. That's the worry here.
We're going to look into this a bit more and see if there are specific problems. Of course, polling staff are allowed to help voters. But since there are some concerns about the impartiality of polling staff, and since some of the villagers here can't read the ballots here--it's an issue.
An Afghan man marking his ballot at a polling site in Herat. (c) 2005 Reuters
News Update, 11:30 AM::
Two rockets hit a U.N. compound in Kabul, but no serious casualties were reported. According to U.N. staff we spoke with earlier today, the U.N. compound on Jalalabad road was hit--one of the main offices of the Joint Electoral Management Body, the Afghan-U.N. body overseeing the election. Reuters reports that "two rockets were fired into a U.N. compound near an election centre in Kabul shortly after polls opened. Only one exploded, slightly wounding an Afghan worker, an election official said." (All Human Rights Watch staff are safe and accounted for.)
Update from Sam Zarifi, north of Kabul, 11:10 AM:
Well, we've done the round robin of everyone, talked to all our teams, and called the Afghan Human Rights Commission and other domestic observation teams, and one thing that's coming out is that it seems there are far fewer voters this time than last year--a much lower voter turnout [than during last year's presidential poll].
We'll see the final results later, but certainly so far, everywhere we've been, and with all the people we've talked to, it seems like there are fewer people voting than last year.
Update from Team 6, Daman district, Kandahar, 11:00 AM:
We are, at the moment, in Daman district, outside Kandahar. We went to one of the polling sites for the Kuchis. [The nomadic Kuchi population of Afghanistan, most of whom live in tents and shepherd goats and sheep, have been allocated 10 seats in the lower house of parliament, and are supposed to vote at special sites set up around the country.]
Nobody was there--only 8 Kuchis voted. We asked the polling staff and they said that only 8 people came and voted.
Now we are going to another rural district, where there is another polling site for Kuchis, and along the way we'll check some other sites as well.
The traveling is slow: the roads are almost empty, but every two or three hundred meters around Kandahar, you are stopped and searched by Afghan military or police. They check our observer cards, they look in the trunk, look at us, and then they let us go.
Outside the city, it's deserted, there is no one to be seen. Just some kids running about, nothing else really, no one else. All the shops are closed, there are just some fruit sellers along the road, but no one else really. A lot of people have already voted.
Otherwise, it's been pretty quiet and there hasn't been any violence we've heard about.
From a member of Team 3 in Ghazni province, 9:40 AM:
I'm in the center of Ghazni, and I just came in from the village of Khoja Omari, which is about an hour outside the city.
There weren't any major problems out there. The voters came in to the polling stations and voted, so things were going smoothly there.
Now I'm in the center of Ghazni city. I'm coming out of the municipal offices, where there is a major polling station.
A lot of people are coming in, and there's a problem with the crowds. The election workers are not very good at controlling the crowds. People are all trying to rush in, and the staff cannot keep the people in line. It happened in a few stations; it's disorganized. But in general, things are going well. Security is alright, and everything is ok. There are a lot of Afghan military police out, Afghan police, American military, and ISAF [International Security Assistance Force, mostly NATO troops].
The other problem is that everywhere we go, there are a lot of candidates' agents [accredited candidate representatives]. They're all over the place. When I asked some of the election officials about this, they said: "We can't ask them to leave the polling stations. There are hundreds of candidates with agents, and every one of these agents wants to enter the sites, and since every candidate has one or two agents, there are a lot of them." [The candidate agents are allowed under election rules to monitor polling sites, but they are supposed to uphold codes of conduct, and not interfere with the voting process.]
They're not doing anything wrong, but they make a crowd inside the polling site. For example, they stand near the polling boxes, and they stand right at the table, and when voters come to the table, the agents crowd around, looking at their voting card, looking at them have their hands marked with ink. [When voting, voters have to show their voting cards and then have their hands marked with indelible ink, which prevents fraudulent multiple voting.] And so they make it difficult for the voters to get by. But they're not making any big problems. They're not saying anything to the voters here, and they're not allowed to go near the stations where the voters actually vote.
From Team 6 in Kandahar, 8:30 AM:
Kandahar city is completely shut down to traffic. There are no cars on the roads, except for those with special passes. When the polls opened at 6 AM, there weren't many voters out. I was waiting around, and the turnout was very low for a while, but things have turned around, and now there are a lot of people coming out. Throughout the city, there's now a lot of activity.
A lot of people are now walking to the polls, and there are now a lot of people on the roads. On the main Shar-e Now road here [New City Road], there are lots of men walking to and from the polls.
But the weather is very hot--very, very hot. The sun is beating down on our heads.
So, the polls opened pretty early. Before the voting started, the poll workers opened up the ballot boxes, which were empty, and showed them to all the observers--showed that they were empty--and then they put on these plastic ties to hold the box tops down.
There are hundreds of men inside the polling sites--quite a lot of men, but the problem is that there are a lot of candidates agents too [accredited candidate representatives], and they are voting too, so that's one of the reasons it's very crowded.
Here in the city, there are about 10 or 12 voting desks in each site. The voters go in, show their voter cards and sign in, and then get their two ballots: one for parliament and one for the local provincial council. They have their hands marked with indelible ink, so that they can't go and vote again, if they've somehow gotten another voting card.
The voters cast two votes: one vote for a parliamentary candidate, to represent this province, Kandahar, in the lower house of parliament; and another one for a candidate to represent them in the Kandahar provincial council. [Later, each of the provincial councils will elect representatives to go serve in Kabul in the upper house of parliament, the house of elders.]
We weren't allowed into the women sites, but there weren't any women there anyway. We couldn't see any women going up to the polls when we first got here. But now a few women have started showing up, about 10 or 15 women came, they were brought in a van. There are no cars allowed generally, but some cars have passes.
There was one problem we saw at some of the sites. In a few cases, there were 2 or 3 guys voting together, in the booths, but the vote is supposed to be secret. So some of the observers pointed this out, that people are supposed to vote alone, and the poll workers told the guys to vote one by one, alone.
The sun is very hot here and it's unfortunate these voters have to walk in the sun to the polls. The sun is really beating down and it's going to be a very hot day.
From Team 2 in Mazar-e Sharif, 7:15
We're at a school where some women are voting. The voting started about 10 minutes ago.
There were some problems with the different candidates' agents: there were so many of them, that no one could fit into the station. (Note: candidates' agents are accredited representatives of different candidates, who are allowed into the voting sites.) But they've sorted that out--now the voting has begun.
Some of the women don't know how to vote--they're asking, "Who are we supposed to vote for? How many people can we vote for?" They don't know whom to vote for, and they don't know that they can only cast a single vote. But some other women are talking to them and trying to explain it.
Otherwise, so far, there are no major problems. We're going to head out to some of the villages outside the city. . . .
6:30 AM: Polls have opened
Polls officially opened about a half hour ago, but the stations haven't
opened in most places. There are small lines of voters starting to
line up at the sites which haven't opened.
Well, I'm west of Charikar, a few hours north of Kabul. We're off-roading. We're trying to get up to this polling site in a village, up on the mountain west of Charikar, and the roads are pretty bad.
The town looks very nice, if we can ever get to it. Like Charikar, it has a lot of terraced houses, where the roof of each house butts into the floor of the next one up the mountain. Very beautiful.
There are goats and sheep everywhere--in other words, a pretty wealthy town.
But the roads aren't so good. We're hanging on the road like a limpet on a rock, though really, we're hardly on a road. In fact, I think the road may have just ended. Indeed, we've reached the end of the road. I don't think this can really be called a road anymore. It's more like a goat path. In short, the road we're on is really not suited for vehicular traffic.
Ok, we're getting out, to walk. We just ran into a very large ditch. . . or rather, somewhere between a ditch and a canyon. A "culvert," I guess you would call it.
Now a young shepherd boy is leading us to the school. . . it's slightly embarrassing that we're being led by a young shepherd boy, but there you have it.
This is a really beautiful valley: you can see all Charikar valley, which is very lush and green--lots of houses with fruit trees, very beautiful. . . .
Ok, we've reached the little town of Khaja Saran. The voting is taking place in this combination mosque-and-school.
It's a really mountainous town --reasonably prosperous, a lot of stone houses. The voting just started, about a half hour ago, and it's actually almost done, since this isn't really a big town.
There's a whole group of men who voted, who are now just hanging out, outside the polls, talking. Inside the polling station, there are four cardboard voting boxes. There's a soldier voting now, and a really, really, really very old man, very bent over, filling out his ballot. There are also a bunch of candidates' agents hanging out--monitors for the candidates and political parties.
Right outside the school is an old Soviet APC--an armored personnel carrier--all gutted out. The turret of the thing has been ripped off and is now being used as a step to walk into the school, an Afghan case of beating swords into plowshares.
, September 17, 2005
From Sam Zarifi:
There´s a full moon over Kabul tonight, without a cloud in the sky. The elections begin tomorrow, and the tension is palpable. Checkpoints have been erected around Kabul and other major cities to keep out most traffic, helicopters fly overhead, and unfortunately, insurgents have stepped up their attacks. A police patrol was attacked just outside Kabul today, killing a deputy police chief.
There was also a shootout on the highway to Kandahar, and coalition and Afghan forces reportedly arrested 20 insurgent troops who were laying explosives along the Kajaki Dam in Helmand province, west of Kandahar. Streets here in Kabul are unusually quiet, except for the troops and police who are out in force.
Our man in Kandahar describes a similar scene. Authorities there have banned all vehicles, except for those with special registrations. The city remains calm. We all hope it stays that way.
Things are a little more tense in Ghazni, which lies between Kandahar and Kabul. Our team reported an explosion outside the city earlier today. And in the vast rural areas between all these cities, the situation is much more tense. In Uruzgon and Helmand provinces, increased attacks by insurgents has seriously impeded electioneering, and we have real doubts about whether voting stations will be open, and whether voters will turn out to vote.
We´re all set for the election. And most everyone in Kabul last
night who had access to a television were glued to their sets to watch the
beginning of the most exciting poll hereno, not the parliamentary elections,
but the debut of the Afghan edition of American Idol. (More on this other election"
in later posts.)
Human Rights Watch teams have fanned across most of the country. Before the teams left, we met again today to go over their proposed routes and to establish security and communication protocols. As I mentioned in a previous post, we have a great group of monitors; bright university students with a real passion for human rights. They are a remarkably resourceful and resilient group. But I admit I suddenly had a case of cold feet at the last minute and considered pulling the plug on their travels. The idea that anything could happen to them because of our work filled me with dread. I´ve already spoken to them in depth, at least three times, about our security protocols, and I could sense their bemusement at my suddenly maternal ways.
In all, there will be over 200 official foreign observers monitoring these
elections (along with thousands of local observers and agents of political
parties and candidates). This may seem like a lot, but it´s actually a lot less than in other recent post-conflict elections, such as in the Balkans. Still, it is hoped that the presence of international monitors may help prevent some possible abuses, intimidation, or fraud. When foreigners show up at a polling site here, their presence is immediately noted and usually changes the entire tenor of the event. Officials are more officious, voters are more proud, and political agents are more demure. But our teamslocal teamshave another asset. Local Afghan observers can and will see the election process more accurately, and in a more natural mannerboth its beauty and its warts.
As a reminder, you can read our real-time dispatches on this site tomorrow, starting at 8:30 AM Kabul time (12:00 AM New York; 5:00 London).
I must say, the fact we can file these dispatches at all is simply incredible.
Through Afghanistan´s nascent mobile system and Human Rights Watch´s
satellite telephones, all linked with Human Rights Watch´s headquarters
in New York, we´re going to be providing real-time information to you
from far corners of Afghanistan. You will be hearing about a one time
historical event, from the ground, as it happens.
Of course, it´s going to be taxing to marshal the resources necessary to provide this information quickly, and at the levels of accuracy and objectivity expected of us. We hope it works, and that our efforts result in increased attention to the human rights situation in Afghanistan.
Our research leading up to these elections has been an intense effort, also involving much of Human Rights Watch´s top researchers.
Nisha Varia, who works in the women´s rights program at Human Rights Watch, conducted dozens of interviews with candidates over the last few months.
We´ve also gotten enormous help from a young Afghan woman herewe´ll
call her Fatima," since we worry for her security. Fatima, a
and fearless Afghan teenager, is something of a mascot for our team. She´s
interviewed countless candidates and voters with us, and will be part of our
monitoring teams on election day.
Our recent background report on the election was written by our researcher John Sifton, who arrived here in August, along with another star researcher for Human Rights Watch, Charmain Mohamed, who normally works in southeast Asia. Charmain and John interviewed scores of candidates in the lead-up to the elections.
It is John Sifton who will be working through the night in the New York office, calling our teams throughout the country and typing up notes from their findings to post on this site. He will be up all night Saturday night and into Sunday; it is reported that he has been hooked to an intravenous drip coffee machine to fortify himself for the job.
, September 16, 2005
From Sam Zarifi:
The shoe mender was adamant that I tell "the foreigners" about his disappointment with Afghanistan's central government and his resentment that his life had not materially improved since U.S. forces removed the Taliban four years ago.
He used an old-fashioned word in Dari for "foreigners," farangis, literally, "the Frankish," a reference to the memory of the Crusader hordes who descended rudely upon the Muslim world 900 years ago.
Because I can speak Dari and look like I could be Afghan, many Afghans treat me as a compatriot, or at least as a cousin from a neighboring country. It is a privilege, and usually a great help in our research, but it sometimes makes it very difficult to maintain the distance and objectivity necessary for carrying out our work. Today, in the face of this man's vehemence, I wanted to retreat behind a wall of foreignness.
I had asked him about the upcoming election, but he didn't really care to discuss it.
"I will not vote for any of them," he said. "I voted last year for Karzai, and I hoped that things would get better, but now I can barely make enough money for my family. None of the candidates are trustworthy and they do not care about us, just about their own success."
He ran a shoe-mending business by the side of the street to try to feed his family, who had returned from refuge in Iran last year. Prices were going up, and police were extorting protection money out of him. For this man, the omnipresent campaign posters around Kabul are simply background noise.
"Tell the farangis that we need work, not these politicians," he said.
While many Afghans are more excited about the election than this, most simply want their government to address the tremendous problems of their daily lives. It has now been nearly four years since U.S. forces ousted the Taliban-almost as long as the Taliban ruled Kabul. After four years of a government supported by the combined might of the international community, many Afghans expect to see more tangible improvement in their lives.
They are grateful to international donors, but they are also growing impatient with the slow pace of economic development, the reemergence of nasty figures from the not-so-distant past, and the iniquities caused by the country's drug trade. They recognize the international community here as a guarantor of the peace and provider of crucial assistance, but there is also a fear that the mysterious farangis who are now in Kabul may leave just as suddenly as they arrived, leaving the job half-done.
Most foreigners in Kabul stay in guesthouses, establishments that fall somewhere between a private residence and a small hotel. For upcoming elections, all the guest houses--a new one seems to spring up every day--have filled up with hundreds of temporary U.N. and diplomatic staff, journalists, aid workers and of course, human rights monitors. The guest houses take on the air of summer camp, full of people reuniting with others that they know through six degrees of destruction: from Kabul, Baghdad, Sarajevo, Kosovo, Chechnya, Nepal and back to Kabul. A group known as "the vulture club."
The guesthouses vary widely; some have lovely gardens, some have elaborate swimming pools (which no one uses), some have little more than bare rooms with running water. What they all have in common is that they are hidden behind high walls, with a sentry post in front. Afghans are, by and large, limited to the serving staff.
Being in a guest house in Kabul can feel very much like not being in Kabul. You can get a decent steak and fries, tortellini with goat cheese, and even French wine. You can get away from Afghanistan.
The shoe mender, like many other Afghans, was worried that the foreigners would leave Afghanistan without helping fix any of the underlying problems, deserting the Afghan people to their poverty and their rapacious leaders.
He may be right. I'm embarrassed to admit that I craved the sanctuary of our guesthouse after nearly three hours with the shoe mender, and a trip to the local police station to discuss the problem of extortion by the police. (Several other small vendors from the area had also complained about this once they heard their colleague discussing it with a foreigner.)
These elections are a test for the legitimacy and resilience of the new Afghan government, but they are also a test of the commitment of the international community to providing crucial assistance to Afghanistan. Will we declare the elections a historic moment, applaud our own philanthropy, and then pack up and leave? That is a real fear here. We even talked about it over a lovely dinner at the guesthouse, behind our high walls and armed sentries.
As we were eating, I noticed a plaque on the wall of the guesthouse's garden. It marked the memory of Marla Ruzicka, a 28-year-old aid worker who was killed by terrorists in Iraq exactly five months ago.
Marla had dedicated herself to gaining compensation for innocent people who had been hurt as a result of U.S. military action, first in Afghanistan, and then in Iraq. She was a bubbly California blonde, prone to using the word "dude," a keen and unstoppable force of nature. In the months after the Taliban's fall, she was known as the Queen of Kabul, for her role at the center of social life for the growing number of foreigners here.
She was even more famous for spending a lot of time outside the walls, trying to help those who had suffered. She was a farangi, no doubt about it, but she was committed to providing assistance where it was most needed.
I wish I could have introduced the angry shoe mender of eastern Kabul to her, to blunt his cynicism and raise his hopes. There could be no better role model for the international community here.
[Note: On Sunday, election day, Human Rights Watch teams will be sending hourly updates to this site from across Afghanistan. Log in to this page starting Sunday at 8:30 AM (12:00 AM New York; 5:00 AM London), and check for updates throughout the day.]
Update from the Afghanistan Team:
Two days to go until election day. The official campaigning period is over, and Kabul was relatively quiet today, but unfortunate news arrived from outside the city.
On Thursday night, in the southern province of Helmand, a parliamentary candidate named Abdul Hadi was shot and killed, reportedly by Taliban forces. And we learned that another women candidate was shot and wounded on Wednesday in Nuristan. The Pajhwok Afghan News Agency also reported two cases of suspected arson of polling sites, including a mosque in Paktika (on the border with Pakistan) and a school in Logar (just south of Kabul).
Voters and candidates remain tense, especially in south and southeastern areas. Most everyone hopes that Afghan police and international forces can lessen the number of insurgent attacks on election day. But in the south and southeast, it's likely a significant number of fearful voters are not going to make it to the polls. In the rest of the country, the polling should go more smoothly, though there are concerns about local militia commanders and strongmen intimidating voters in rural areas. Our monitoring teams have set out to some of the more remote areas, to visit sites on Sunday and access security conditions and look for cases of intimidation.
Meanwhile, logistical preparations for the election continue apace. Afghan election authorities are distributing ballots, ballot boxes and other elections materials to the thousands of sites around the country. In most places, this is a relatively simple affair: workers just load up trucks with materials and set off for villages.
Afghan workers loading ballot papers onto a truck in Kabul September 16, 2005. (c) Reuters/Ahmad Massod 2005
Afghanistan is a mountainous country, and there are some areas that trucks and cars simply cannot reach. But election authorities have thought ahead, and hired asses and camels to acts as "mobile polling stations" for some of the more remote areas.
Afghan men preparing asses loaded with mobile polling stations in the eastern province of Badakhshan, September 16, 2005. (c) Reuters 2005
One election observer called these "ballot-carrying jackasses."
And jackasses are exactly what one needs to get out to rocky high-altitude districts, like some of the northeastern districts of Badakhshan province, which form the "panhandle" that sticks out to the northeast of the country.
Human Rights Watch won't be able to follow the mobile voting stations out to the most remote provinces, but we'll keep an eye out for some of the mobile teams in the mountains north of Kabul. Remember to follow this page on Sunday for hourly updates from the teams.
, September 15, 2005
From: Sam Zarifi
Today began with broken hardware and ended with broken hearts. This morning in Kabul, we released a major report exposing how warlord intimidation and insurgent attacks are undermining Afghanistan's election process. The first order of the day was to print out the just-finalized PDF of the 27-page report, which involved an epic struggle with faulty internet connections, incompatible software and a particularly recalcitrant printer. We released our report at noon Kabul time, and it was immediately covered in many media outlets, including the BBC, Reuters, AFP and Associated Press. My day finally ended at a Kabul theatre, watching a performance of "Romeo and Juliet," not in Shakespearean English but in Dari, one of the main local languages here.
First, about our report: "Afghanistan on the Eve of Parliamentary and Provincial Elections." My first job today was to download the finalized report, format it for Afghan computers and printers, print it out, and then drive around town to deliver copies. Human Rights Watch reports generally go out to a wide list of journalists and policymakers. But to ensure that they read them, it's crucial that we put actual paper copies squarely in people's hands, which gives our readers an opportunity to ask questions and discuss our findings.
Things went badly from the start. The internet café that we usually use experienced a total system failure, so I had to scramble to find another one. Finding internet cafés in Kabul these days isn't easy. Ever since a suicide bomber attacked the main internet café we used to frequent, such establishments have moved to basements or the backs of buildings. These locations are great for security, but they are hell for mobile phone connections.
In Kabul, you need to carry two mobile phones for each of Afghanistan's competing phone networks, since one network is often down. Once I found an internet café, I discovered that both of my mobile phones had enough reception to pick up incoming calls, but not enough to actually carry on a conversation. As I was printing out the report, I kept jumping out of my seat to answer the phone.
Then, after the printer fiasco, I began a madcap dash around town to deliver copies of the report. Given our tight schedule, I had to do my best to be pleasant, answer questions, and move on to the next delivery. Our report's findings-that violence and intimidation are hurting the election process-contradict some of the conventional wisdom here, in particular, that the elections are a panacea for all of Afghanistan's ills. So I had to spend much of the day countering the official spin, and presenting the facts we had gathered from hundreds of interviews with candidates, voters and observers around the country.
My next step was to pick up money transferred by wire, so we could help support our small team of local monitors, who will be fanning out across the country on election day. Western Union's main office in Kabul was closed, so I had to dash across town to the other location, which is located deep in the chaotic moneychangers' bazaar.
With a brick-sized wad of dollars in my pocket, I returned in time to meet our monitoring team-a group of young men and women, mostly university students, committed to human rights and the rule of law, and willing to put up with difficult roads and security risks in order to monitor polling spots around the country. We discussed what they need to look for on election day: among other things, evidence of tampering with the ballots or ballot boxes, and signs of interference by political parties or candidates' agents. Our session was repeatedly interrupted by phone calls from journalists interested in discussing our report.
After two hours, our monitors went on their ways, armed with keen intelligence, notebooks, mobile phones and youthful enthusiasm. It will be quite a challenge coordinating their activities and gathering the information they will collect on election day.
Finally, just as I was about to keel over from a scarce diet of sour-cherry juice and cigarettes, I received a call from a friend, inviting me to attend a final performance of "Romeo and Juliet."
Yes, that's right: Shakespeare in Kabul. Needless to say, I accepted the invitation. Tonight's performance was the last in a series of Shakespeare plays presented here in Dari. The productions, which have received assistance from U.S. and European artists, have been presented here since late August. The play was held in the open air in the courtyard of a former prime minister's house.
Romeo woos Juliet © Human Rights Watch 2005
It was a charming performance. All the performers, except Juliet, were men. The actors in drag added a note of historical Shakespearean authenticity. It was a short performance, just one hour. Since the performers didn't have enough time to rehearse the entire play, a narrator simply recounted the rest of the story after the point at which the two young lovers exchanged vows of love. It was a novel approach, but nonetheless clearly moving for both the audience and the troupe.
Romeo and Juliet exchange vows of commitment
(c) Human Rights Watch
As a theme, the director had chosen to emphasize the folly of needless violence and the threat it posed to innocent youth, a notion that clearly resonates in today's Afghanistan.
Juliet prepares to drink potion in order to reunite with Romeo
© Human Rights Watch 2005
When the dying Mercutio finally declares "a pox upon both your houses," it was not just a curse on the Capulets and Montagues, but a condemnation of those who take up arms to destroy love and beauty. As the audience stood up to applause, I wondered how many of them were thinking about young friends and relatives they had lost over the past 25 years of conflict here, and about the future. Would all the deaths of the past be enough to force reconciliation upon leaders blinded by years of violence, as happened with the warring families of Romeo and Juliet?
Elections are near, and time will tell.
From: Sam Zarifi
Today I found myself face to face with Abdul Rabb al-Rasul Sayyaf , one of Afghanistan's most notorious warlords, and he was complaining about Human Rights Watch.
Sayyaf was one of the leading mujahideen commanders in the fight against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, and the leader of one of Afghanistan's meanest militias during the ruinous civil war that followed the Soviets' withdrawal. Human Rights Watch has documented serious abuses by his forces in the mid-1990s, and yet more abuses by his forces after his return to prominence after the fall of the Taliban. We have repeatedly called for Sayyaf to be investigated and prosecuted for his actions, along with other mujahideen, communist, and Taliban human rights abusers who have plagued this country.
Abdul Rabb al-Rasul Sayyaf © Reuters 2005
Sayyaf was holding a campaign rally near Kabul in support of his bid for parliament. Candidates can be disqualified for maintaining links to armed factions. So I went to the rally to monitor whether repeated allegations that Sayyaf continued to field a sizable militia were correct. The short answer is: yes, indeed.
Sayyaf held the rally at a new mosque he's building in his home district of Paghman, a lovely, mountainous area west of Kabul. The most prominent feature on the mosque-dwarfing even the lone minaret-was a giant campaign poster of Sayyaf, resplendent in his grey-white bushy beard, bearing the legend "Your Mujahid Brother." And directly atop the poster was a machine-gun emplacement manned by a pair of gentlemen in camouflage pants who did not appear to be members of the Afghan National Army or Police.
Gunman stand guard atop the mosque in which Sayyaf's rally was held. The campaign billboard describes Sayyaf as "Your Mujahid Brother." (c) Human Rights Watch
Also notable among the 1,500 or so Sayyaf supporters were a significant number of fans sporting Kalashnikovs, along with a pickup truck bristling with gun barrels. I, for one, did not know you could fit 15 heavily armed men on the back of a pickup.
After his speech, which focused on the role of Islam in Afghanistan's future government, Sayyaf left the mosque and held an impromptu press conference. I found myself in the scrum of reporters, amazed to be about three feet from a man whom I had previously mostly heard about from the quivering mouths of victims traumatized by his forces.
Just as I was thinking about that, I heard a foreign reporter ask Sayyaf what he thought of claims by Human Rights Watch that he was a war criminal and major human rights abuser. My hair stood on end, my blood ran cold, my sweat beaded on my already sweaty forehead, and I only barely fought the urge to duck to the ground. All because I was dying to hear his response-although I really did not want to die just to hear it.
Well, the answer just about floored me. Here's how Reuters reported the Sayyaf's response: "If there was some proof that I had committed some crimes, then I will be responsible for that, but I am sure that we have worked for the freedom of the country. We have struggled against crimes and didn't commit crimes. These are only the claims of those who are against us and against the freedom of this country."
Sayyaf said he supported the punishment of criminals, but investigations would need to be done impartially. "We want a pure and clear and sincere investigation," he said. "We want the facts to be uncovered. We want the facts to be well-known to the nation."
So there you have it: Sayyaf has now publicly stated his support for an accountability process. This is a major development, one that I believe is due at least in part to Human Rights Watch's reporting and advocacy, in particular our report on atrocities in Kabul during the civil war in 1992-93. We now see various Afghan military figures criticizing one another's human rights records and calling for an accountability process. Which is exactly what we want.
On the other hand, our fear is that once Sayyaf is elected to parliament-which looks like a sure bet-he and other implicated warlord types will push for some kind of immunity from prosecution for themselves-even as they pursue their former enemies.
The Afghan government and election authorities had the chance to sideline figures with links to armed factions from the elections, but they didn't use it. Now, we all have to wait to see how these figures behave once elected.
, September 13, 2005
From: Sam Zarifi
Everyone in Kabul is talking about one parliamentary candidate "the woman in yellow". Nobody knows what her views are on access to education or on land reform. But she is undoubtedly one of the best known parliamentary candidates in Kabul. Amongst the door, and downright glowering, campaign photos plastered on every conceivable surface, her picture stands out for her obvious youth, her sweet smile, and her bright yellow veil which artistically frames, but does not quite cover, her hair. Frankly, her campaign picture looks more like the cover of a glossy magazine, or an advertisement for a demure Bollywood movie, than a political poster. It is now being sold on the streets for up to $5.
The entire country, right now, is awash in posters. There are nearly 5,800 candidates running for parliamentary and provincial council and they have all put posters up. And billboards. And the campaign business cards that candidates hand out like candy. Some potential voters collect the cards the way young boys collect baseball cards.
In a country where the vast majority of voters are illiterate and political parties are not allowed to campaign, the candidates´ photos are the primary means of communicating with voters. These campaign devices have to convey enough information to allow voters to remember and vote for candidates on election day. That´s no easy task for voters, considering that in some places, the ballots (one each for the parliamentary and provincial races) can run up to seven pages. It would be hard even if voters could read the name of their favorite candidatemost can´t.
Instead, the elections here rely on a combination of helpful devices. Each candidate has a number, which may or may not be easier to remember than a name. Also, every candidate has been assigned a symbol. The symbols were selected to be devoid of any political association. The woman in yellow´s symbol is two bunniesseriously. There are also three lions, a running stallion, two onions, a watermelon, thunderbolts, computer terminals, inkwells, and one luckless candidate got an eight-ballwhich is likely to be totally incomprehensible to some Afghans. It couldn´t have been an easy task, finding thousands of innocuous, distinctive, memorable symbols.
While the symbols are meaningless, the candidates´ photos communicate volumes. Smiling is definitely out. It´s too western, too friendly, too jocular (hence the impact of the woman in yellow´s photo). For the men, it´s western versus traditional clothing, it´s not smiling versus scowling, and of course it´s quantity and coverage of facial hair. There are full-on bushy Stalin mustaches, trim little goatees, and flowing beardsindicating old fashioned lefties, western style technocrats, and conservative religious views respectively. Woman candidates convey some of the same information through the color, shape, and coverage of their veils or headscarves, which range from tight and dark to, well, yellow and flowing.
The woman in yellow has become the talk of the town among the foreign journalists, diplomats, and aid workers working in Kabul. But we, like many Afghans we speak with, have no idea of what she and most other political candidates stand for. We have to make do with rumors and suggestions. We heard a rumor last night that she had been threatened and forced to leave for France. As soon as we got over our shock we tried to get to the bottom of it (a false rumor apparently). Another rumor is that her candidacy is actually put forward by one of the major political armed factions. We are trying to get to the bottom of this rumor also. In this environment it is impossible for us to keep track of every individual candidate´s political affiliation or past record, so we like the afghan voting public have to rely on such crude iconography at times.
That a young woman is allowed to run for parliament in Afghanistan is remarkable progress, but that only goes so far. We still don´t know how the woman in yellow will fare as a member of parliament if she is elected, and how she will act on issues of basic human rights, education, land reform, health, and economic development. Given the electoral system set up for this election, the voters have virtually no opportunity to make up their mind about such important issues. Unfortunately the woman in yellow´s charm alone is not likely to satisfy the voters when this parliament begins its work. The Afghans who wade through lists of hundreds of candidates, looking for the assigned symbol of their preferred choice (Is that melon or an apple? A video monitor or a Quonset hut?) will have done their job and they will expect results soon.
From: Sam Zarifi
Charmain is standing in the midday sun and dust for about an hour in this Pashtun village in southern Samangan, a region in the high, dry plains of northern Afghanistan. She was waiting for me to finish interviews with a group of irate Pashtun grey-beards.
She had prematurely finished her interviews with a group of women shortly after a man had come in to tell them not to say anything that would cause trouble. Charmain had gathered this group of women (seven and counting) to discuss their views on the upcoming parliamentary and provincial elections. They told her they were registered to vote, they were prepared to voteand they were going to vote exactly as they were told by their husbands and fathers.
There's only so much a couple of human rights researchers can do. You can develop a highly sophisticated research methodology, but you can't get around the finality of an order by a man to end an interview with women in Afghanistan.
In order to get a full picture of life in Afghanistan, particularly, say, in a hilltop village of Pashtuns, you need to interview men and women separately, which means you need a woman to interview the women. Charmain Mohamed, who usually covers Indonesia and East Timor for Human Rights Watch, is our woman in Afghanistan.
Charmain has worked on elections in East Timor and Indonesia before, and is something of an expert on electoral processes in dicey situations. She also is extremely comfortable with her hair covered in a veil and a "salaam alaikum" on her lips. She's been trying to figure out how well Afghan women are prepared for these elections.
The answer: as voters, their enthusiasm outstrips their understanding of electoral gamesmanship, but is constrained by tradition and religious norms; as candidates, their presence is a real symbol of the perseverance of Afghan women in the face of generations of social discrimination and the depredations of the Taliban.
As Charmain has found out in dozens of interviews across northern Afghanistan, women here understand the importance of the vote and the potential for change for their status in Afghan society. Social, religious, economic, and security constraints aside this election could mark a turning point for women´s human rights in Afghanistan. A quarter of the seats in the parliament are reserved for women, and women make up about 45 percent of those registered to vote.
While Charmain was left boiling in the sun, I was interviewing the women's husbands and fathers. This highly vocalsome would say loudgroup wanted to make sure that I, and through me the world beyond, understood how sick they were of local militia commanders and how upset they were that some of these commanders were allowed to run for parliament.
Sitting cross-legged on the floor of the headman's house, with gallons of green tea only adding to the infernal heat, they kept poking me in the chest, on the arms, on the knees, and, by the end of the session, on the head to emphasize their disappointment about the continuing presence of former and current gunmen in the electoral list.
"We are sick of these warlords!" Poke. "They have ruined our lives for 25 years." Poke. "We may even vote for a woman, because the women's hands are free of blood, and they will not fight if they don't agree." Poke, poke.
It's a measure of their anger that they would consider voting for a female candidate, and a measure of how much potential there is for Afghan women, after years of male dominated war and blood shed.
Recent Work on Afghanistan from
Human Rights Watch: