<<previous | index | next>>
There are many possible approaches to peer review, and a
variety of acceptable answers to the many questions that will arise in the
effort to develop an effective process for UPR. These discussions, however,
should be guided by the following four principles which should be the basis for
whatever approach is taken to UPR:
- The
review should be based on a wide range of objective and reliable information
regarding the human rights situation in the country under review;
- An
effective review will require the appointment of an expert or panel of experts
who will review the compiled materials and distill this material into a list of
key issues for review and questions to be addressed by the government;
- The
review process should include an appropriate role for NGOs, including the
possibility to submit reports for consideration, and the ability to participate
in UPR discussions; and
- The
review should result in an outcome statement with concrete conclusions and
recommendations and an agreed mechanism to ensure effective follow up.
|
