Conclusions and RecommendationsHuman Rights Watch found that repatriation procedures in Andalusia fall short of guaranteeing that repatriations serve childrens best interests and ensure their safety and well-being. In fact, we found that there is a fundamental misunderstanding of the best interest principle and dangerous presumption that return for an unaccompanied child is in the childs best interest and need not be determined on an individual basis and in combination with a risk assessment. These findings are consistent with repeated criticism by the Spanish Ombudsman and non-governmental organizations, and with rulings by national courts. They also show that repatriation procedures lack crucial safeguards: unaccompanied children are not given independent representation during a procedure that has a fundamental impact on their lives and may put their well-being and the exercise of their fundamental rights at risk. To the Government of SpainChange repatriation procedures to include, at the minimum, the following safeguards:
Make the implementation of the bilateral readmission agreements transparent by allowing for independent monitoring of their implementation and by making the periodic reports by the committees tasked to oversee the agreements implementation public. To the United Nations Human Rights CommitteeUrge Spain to improve its safeguards for unaccompanied children who face repatriations in order to comply with its obligation under article 13 of the ICCPR, in accord with the above recommendations to the Spanish government. Recommend in particular that Spain provide unaccompanied children independent lawyers during repatriation procedures. To the Governments of Morocco and SenegalUrge the government of Spain to grant unaccompanied children their full rights as stipulated by national law and binding international obligations. Make the implementation of the bilateral readmission agreements transparent and allow for their independent monitoring. Cooperate in the return of an unaccompanied child when such a decision is in the childs best interests and if adequate care arrangements can be guaranteed for the returned child. |