publications

VI. The Need for a Durable Solution

One of the core components of international protection for refugees is finding durable solutions.107 The refugee regime offers three durable solutions for refugees: voluntary repatriation, local integration in the region of displacement, or resettlement in a third country. The principal objective of each durable solution is to restore national protection to refugees. Sixteen years after the first ethnic Nepalis fled or were expelled from Bhutan the Bhutanese refugees are still awaiting a durable solution.

While the Bhutanese refugees have found basic protection in Nepal, the continuing confinement of more than 100,000 refugees to camps is clearly not sustainable either for the refugees or for the international community. As discussed earlier, the protracted nature of this refugee crisis is taking a heavy toll on the refugees. Being reduced to a state of complete dependency is a source of immeasurable frustration, and has given rise to increased levels of depression and psychosocial problems in the camps.108 Refugee parents despair of their inability to provide a future for their children, while in the past few years refugee youths have been growing increasingly restless in the face of the ongoing uncertainty about their prospects. Time and again refugees indicated to Human Rights Watch that while they are grateful for the support they receive from the international community, their only true desire is to be restored to the status of full citizens, with full respect for their political, civil, economic, social and cultural rights. A young refugee man expressed his frustration with his situation as follows: “I cannot live in the camp anymore. I will go to any country where they will give me citizenship, even if it is Afghanistan.”109 A 45-year-old refugee said:

We want to live in an atmosphere where we can eat our own bread earned from our own sweat. We don’t want to be dependent on others. We no longer want to have the tag of “refugee.” Half our lives have been spent as refugees. We don’t want that tag on our children’s forehead. We want them to be proud citizens.110

In interviews with Human Rights Watch, some refugees said that they have vested their hopes in political changes in Bhutan leading to their Bhutanese citizenship being restored, while others said that they hope for Nepal or a third country to offer them citizenship. But what all those interviewed have in common is their urgent desire to regain their independence and to be allowed to become productive members of society, able to take care of their own needs and to offer a future to their children.111 As a 25-year-old refugee man said, “I don’t want a golden plate. I want freedom.”112 The camp secretary of Timai camp spoke for many refugees when he said, “People in the camps are very frustrated. They look for an end to their refugee existence. They need a solution. It can be any of the three solutions [repatriation, resettlement or local integration], but we do not want to continue as refugees anymore, that is the general plea of the refugees.”113




107 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Agenda for Protection, Third Edition (Geneva: UNHCR, Department of International Protection, October 2003), http://www.unhcr.org/protect/PROTECTION/3e637b194.pdf (accessed January 25, 2007), Goal 5: “Redoubling the Search for Durable Solutions”, p. 74. The Agenda for Protection has been welcomed by the UN General Assembly, Resolution 57/187 (2002), A/RES/57/187, December 18, 2002 http://www.un.org/Depts/dhl/resguide/r57.htm (accessed January 25, 2007), para. 6.

108 UNHCR-Nepal, “2005 Annual Report on Sexual and Gender-Based Violence in Relation to Refugees and Asylum-Seekers,” October 17, 2006, p. 1.

109 Human Rights Watch interview (K43), Birtamod, November 18, 2006.

110 Human Rights Watch interview (B23), Beldangi I camp, November 13, 2006.

111 Even those refugees who have moved away from the camps and who have found employment in Nepal by no means have a secure existence, since it is illegal for them to work in Nepal. They are frequently paid less than their Nepalese colleagues for the same work, and do not have job security. A teacher said, “I may have a job now, but tomorrow I may be dismissed. It is not a permanent solution. The refugee problem must be settled.” Human Rights Watch interview (K43), Birtamod, November 18, 2006. Another teacher agreed: “We work outside the camp to support our families.  We work illegally in boarding schools.  Much smaller salaries are paid to refugee teachers. Unless you are a citizen, you will not be able to sell your labor fairly. Our children have no certain future.” Human Rights Watch interview (B25), Sanischare camp, November 14, 2006.

112 Human Rights Watch interview (B10), Beldangi II-extension camp, November 11, 2006.

113 Human Rights Watch interview with camp secretary Parshuram Nepal of Timai camp (B45/K35), November 16, 2006. Each camp has a camp secretary, who is elected by the refugees for a period of one year, and who heads the camp management committee (CMC), a body of elected refugee representatives responsible for the day-to-day management of the camp.