publications

<<previous  |  index  |  next>>

II. Recommendations 

The extent of homelessness and barriers to prisoner reentry are vast social problems, and Human Rights Watch believes that the U.S. must do far more to address them.  Our recommendations, however, focus on the narrow question of the exclusion of people with criminal records from federally-assisted housing.  If implemented, these recommendations would allow PHAs to pursue the goal of safe housing without excluding those who pose no risk.  Such careful evaluations would afford people with criminal records a second chance. 

To the U.S. Congress

  • Repeal federal laws that impose outright bans on public housing for certain types of offenders.
  • Pass federal legislation that requires PHAs to conduct an individualized evaluation of each applicant with a criminal record before making a decision on the application.
  • Ratify the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and acknowledge the right of all residents of the United States to adequate housing that is decent, safe, and affordable.

To the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

  • Adopt policies that require individualized consideration of each applicant with a criminal record, prior to making a decision on an application, to determine whether he or she will pose a risk to existing housing tenants.  Require the following factors be included in the consideration: (1) evidence of rehabilitation, either during incarceration or in the community; (2) the effect of denial on minor children and efforts to reunify families; and (3) whether denial will render the applicant homeless.
  • Require PHAs to adopt admissions policies that ensure:

    o criminal records that are more than ten years old do not prevent admission, absent extraordinary circumstances;

    o offenses upon which denials are based are relevant to being a good tenant; and

    o absent a pattern of continuing arrests, consideration of a criminal record is limited to convictions.

  • Monitor denials of public housing to ensure that they are not arbitrary, that they are based on reasonable and individualized determinations of risk, and that they do not have a disproportionate and unjustifiable impact on applicants from racial and ethnic minorities.
  • Require PHAs to compile and make public on an annual basis the number of applications made for public housing, the number of applicants denied because of negative criminal history information, the number of those denied who appeal, and the number of those challenging their denials who prevail following administrative hearings.
  • Conduct expert and ongoing evaluations of whether policies excluding people with criminal records from public housing have an effect on crime patterns, public safety, and quality of life in public housing.
  • Provide guidance and training to PHAs about how to conduct individualized evaluations of applications for housing assistance.
  • Research the feasibility and design of expanded alternative housing programs for people with criminal records who cannot be accommodated in existing public housing models because of their criminal histories.

To Public Housing Authorities

  • Adopt policies that require individualized consideration of each applicant with a criminal record, prior to making a decision on an application, to determine whether he or she will pose a risk to existing housing tenants.  Ensure that the following factors be included in the consideration: (1) evidence of rehabilitation, either during incarceration or in the community; (2) the effect of denial on minor children and efforts to reunify families; and (3) whether denial will render the applicant homeless.
  • Adopt criminal record admissions screening polices that consider:

    o only criminal records that are less than ten years old, absent extraordinary circumstances;

    o only those offenses that are relevant to being a good tenant; and

    o only convictions, absent a pattern of continuing arrests.

  • Provide an administrative appeal process for those deemed ineligible for public housing that ensures the full range of due process rights including: adequate notice of the reason for denial; the opportunity to appear with representation, to question witnesses and present evidence and testimony; a written and publicly-available decision setting forth reasons for the administrative decision; and a meaningful opportunity to appeal the administrative decision to a court of law.
  • Advise applicants who are denied eligibility for public housing of the availability of local legal assistance to represent them should they choose to challenge their denials.
  • Ensure that applicant criminal records are obtained from a reliable source.

To Publicly-Funded Legal Services Organizations

  • Reconsider any policy or practice against providing legal assistance to applicants who are denied admission to public housing and train attorneys, paralegals, and law students to represent applicants in administrative hearings.
  • Monitor local PHA policies and practices to determine whether they violate federal law or policy.
  • Conduct outreach to ensure that applicants understand their right to apply for public housing, to challenge their denials in administrative proceedings, and to appeal adverse administrative decisions to courts of law.

To the United Nations

  • The Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights should issue a comment on the human rights dimensions of government-assisted housing, with particular attention to arbitrary criteria used to determine eligibility for assistance and to whether denials of assistance result in outright homelessness.
  • The U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Right to Adequate Housing should report on the United States’ denial of housing assistance to individuals because of their criminal histories.


<<previous  |  index  |  next>>November 2004