Copyright © October 1995 by Human Rights Watch.
All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America.
Human Rights Watch Children's Rights Project
The Human Rights Watch Children's Rights Project was established in 1994 to monitor and promote the human rights of children around the world. Lois Whitman is the director and Mina Samuels is a consultant.
Human Rights Watch conducts regular, systematic investigations of human rights abuses in some seventy countries around the world. It addresses the human rights practices of governments of all political stripes, of all geopolitical alignments, and of all ethnic and religious persuasions. In internal wars it documents violations by both governments and rebel groups. Human Rights Watch defends freedom of thought and expression, due process and equal protection of the law; it documents and denounces murders, disappearances, torture, arbitrary imprisonment, exile, censorship and other abuses of internationally recognized human rights.
Human Rights Watch began in 1978 with the founding of its Helsinki division. Today, it includes five divisions covering Africa, the Americas, Asia, the Middle East, as well as the signatories of the Helsinki accords. It also includes five collaborative projects on arms transfers, children's rights, free expression, prison conditions, and women's rights. It maintains offices in New York, Washington, Los Angeles, London, Brussels, Moscow, Dushanbe, Rio de Janeiro, and Hong Kong. Human Rights Watch is an independent, nongovernmental organization, supported by contributions from private individuals and foundations worldwide. It accepts no government funds, directly or indirectly.
The staff includes Kenneth Roth, executive director; Cynthia Brown, program director; Holly J. Burkhalter, advocacy director; Robert Kimzey, publications director; Jeri Laber, special advisor; Gara LaMarche, associate director; Lotte Leicht, Brussels office director; Juan Méndez, general counsel; Susan Osnos, communications director; Jemera Rone, counsel; Joanna Weschler, United Nations representative; and Derrick Wong, finance and administration director.
The regional directors of Human Rights Watch are Peter Takirambudde, Africa; José Miguel Vivanco, Americas; Sidney Jones, Asia; Holly Cartner, Helsinki; and Christopher E. George, Middle East. The project directors are Joost R. Hiltermann, Arms Project; Lois Whitman, Children's Rights Project; Gara LaMarche, Free Expression Project; and Dorothy Q. Thomas, Women's Rights Project.
The members of the board of directors are Robert L. Bernstein, chair; Adrian W. DeWind, vice chair; Roland Algrant, Lisa Anderson, Peter D. Bell, Alice L. Brown, William Carmichael, Dorothy Cullman, Irene Diamond, Edith Everett, Jonathan Fanton, Jack Greenberg, Alice H. Henkin, Harold Hongju Koh, Jeh Johnson, Stephen L. Kass, Marina Pinto Kaufman, Alexander MacGregor, Josh Mailman, Andrew Nathan, Jane Olson, Peter Osnos, Kathleen Peratis, Bruce Rabb, Orville Schell, Sid Sheinberg, Gary G. Sick, Malcolm Smith, Nahid Toubia, Maureen White, and Rosalind C. Whitehead.
Addresses for Human Rights Watch
485 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10017-6104
Tel: (212) 972-8400, Fax: (212) 972-0905, E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
1522 K Street, N.W., #910, Washington, DC 20005-1202
Tel: (202) 371-6592, Fax: (202) 371-0124, E-mail: email@example.com
10951 West Pico Blvd., #203, Los Angeles, CA 90064-2126
Tel: (310) 475-3070, Fax: (310) 475-5613, E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
33 Islington High Street, N1 9LH London, UK
Tel: (171) 713-1995, Fax: (171) 713-1800, E-mail: email@example.com
15 Rue Van Campenhout, 1040 Brussels, Belgium
Tel: (2) 732-2009, Fax: (2) 732-0471, E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
FREQUENTLY USED ABBREVIATIONS viii
AN OVERVIEW OF CHILDREN IN CONFINEMENT 6
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS 6
U.S. STANDARDS 7
U.S. GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT 9
SECURE CONFINEMENT IN LOUISIANA 12
PHYSICAL CONDITIONS 14
East Baton Rouge-Louisiana Training Institute 15
Bridge City-Louisiana Training Institute 17
Monroe-Louisiana Training Institute 17
Tallulah Correctional Center for Youth 18
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS ON PHYSICAL CONDITIONS 20
PHYSICAL ABUSE 27
East Baton Rouge-Louisiana Training Institute 28
Monroe-Louisiana Training Institute 32
Tallulah Correctional Center for Youth 33
Bridge City-Louisiana Training Institute 33
COMPLAINT PROCESS 34
EDUCATION AND PROGRAMMING 37
THE PRINCIPLE OF NORMALIZATION AND TREATMENT 40
To the state of Louisiana 43
To the Federal government 45
UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD 47
UNITED NATIONS RULES FOR THE PROTECTIONOF JUVENILES DEPRIVED OF THEIR LIBERTY 76
UNITED NATIONS STANDARD MINIMUM RULES
FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE
(THE BEIJING RULES) 97
UNITED NATIONS GUIDELINES FOR THEPREVENTION OF JUVENILE DELINQUENCY 129
Research for this report was undertaken in Louisiana by Mina Samuels, a consultant to the Human Rights Watch Children's Rights Project and Michelle India Baird, then counsel to the Human Rights Watch Children's Rights Project. It was written by Mina Samuels and jointly edited by Lois Whitman, director of the Human Rights Watch Children's Rights Project, Jeri Laber, senior advisor to Human Rights Watch and Juan Mendez, general counsel to Human Rights Watch. Arvind Ganesan provided invaluable production assistance.
We wish to express our gratitude to the many organizations and individuals in Louisiana and other parts of the United States who helped make this report possible. We would like to thank Cecile Guin in Lousiana and Mark Soler, President of the Youth Law Center, for reviewing drafts of the report. Special thanks are due to the Secretary of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Richard Stalder, and his staff for their cooperation during our visit to Louisiana and thereafter as we prepared the report. We would also like to express our thanks to the many children who spoke to us of their experiences in confinement. Unfortunately we cannot thank them by name, as their anonymity must be preserved.
ACA American Correctional Association
ARP Administrative Remedy Procedure
CRC Convention on the Rights of Child
DPSC Department of Public Safety and Corrections
EBR East Baton Rouge
GED Graduate Equivalency Degree
HRW Human Rights Watch
JRDC Juvenile Reception and Diagnostic Center
LTI Louisiana Training Institutes
OJJDP Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
TCCY Tallulah Correctional Center for Youth
All my ribs were purple at EBR-LTI. A new boy came in and I tried to help him so he wouldn't get beaten up and then a guard pulled us both up and he slapped both of us and then he told me to raise my arms and he beat my ribs until they were purple and blue and I didn't tell my mom cause I knew she would start something.1
EBR, that's a messed up place. The guards will beat you. One of them named Mr.O, he has a thing called a 'house party'. If you work on weekends he wakes you up at 5 A.M.. He calls you in the back where we take showers and beats you for a whole hour. When we go to the mess hall to eat we have to count, and he tells you to come see, then he calls you into the washroom and beats you up and another sergeant comes to beat you. It has only happened two times to me ... I would change EBR. [I would] fire all the workers cause they are just dirty. "New jacks" come in talking, and they beat them up for nothing. This boy at EBR with me, a guard broke his arm with a broom ... [there were] boys lying on the floor and the sarge picked up his chair and threw it at him and hit him. If you tell a counselor, all it's going to do is make it worse.2
In March and May 1995, the Human Rights Watch Children's Rights Project conducted an investigation in Louisiana into the conditions in which children3 are confined in that state, examining the human rights aspects of their incarceration. We found that substantial numbers of children in the state training institutions are regularly physically abused by guards, are kept in isolation for long periods of time, and are improperly restrained by handcuffs.
The state of Louisiana is by most standards one of the poorest states in the U.S. It has one of the highest rates in the country of children living in poverty and children not in school or working. Large numbers of children, especially black children, are suspended from school each year, sometimes for the whole year. Louisiana also has one of the highest rates of incarceration among U.S. states.4 Approximately 1,500 children are confined in secure correctional facilities each year. The circumstances which lead to their incarceration are not within the scope of this report, nor are due process problems, such as adequate representation of the children. Human Rights Watch confined its investigation to the conditions in which children are confined in the Louisiana institutions.
In Louisiana all acts committed by a person over the age of seventeen are tried in adult court, but children over the age of fourteen may be waived by the district attorney into the adult court system for certain enumerated violent crimes. All other children between the ages of eleven and seventeen are under the jurisdiction of the Louisiana Children's Code5 and are adjudicated by special juvenile courts, or district and parish courts with original juvenile jurisdiction. Children under the age of eleven are not subject to criminal adjudication. Certain enumerated acts, such as first and second degree murder and aggravated rape, that are not waived into the adult court, carry the potential adjudication by the court of juvenile jurisdiction of a juvenile life sentence. Under a juvenile life sentence a child is committed to a correctional facility until the age of twenty-one for an act committed before the age of eighteen. That means that children between the ages of eleven and twenty-one are confined in the four post-adjudication correctional facilities. These four correctional facilities are currently operating under a Federal court stipulation and consent decree, described below, that governs population limits and staffing levels.
During the course of its investigations Human Rights Watch conducted interviews with more than sixty children incarcerated in all four long-term secure juvenile facilities in the state.6 In addition we spoke with lawyers, judges, staff of the juvenilefacilities, former and current Louisiana state government officials, private individuals working on contract in the juvenile justice system both in Louisiana and in the U.S. in general, and individuals employed at the Federal Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) and the Special Litigation Section of the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice. During our first visit to Louisiana we visited two detention facilities and two state correctional facilities. At the correctional facilities we were not allowed to speak with children. After a substantial exchange of letters requesting permission to interview children we were given permission by the Secretary of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections in Louisiana (DPSC) to visit all four of the secure correctional facilities, generally called Lousiana Training Institutes (LTI), and to speak with children incarcerated at those facilities. Human Rights Watch enjoyed a high level of cooperation from state government officials on its second visit to Louisiana and thereafter in its correspondence with the Secretary of the DPSC and his staff. We were able to interview children chosen by us from the roster of children housed at each facility. The interviews were conducted in private rooms separated by sight and sound from any staff at the facility.
This report is in two parts. The first provides an overview of children in confinement. It outlines and describes the standards, both international and national, which apply to children in confinement, and the U.S. government's involvement in the juvenile justice system. The second section describes the conditions found at the four correctional facilities in the State. At the beginning of each sub-section of the second part of the report the relevant international standards will be referred to, and outlined briefly, to provide guidance in identifying violations of the standards. The international standards appear in full in the appendices to this report.
One of the most disturbing findings made by the Human Rights Watch Children's Rights Project in its investigation of the conditions in which children are confined in Louisiana was that physical abuse of the children is pervasive in the system of correctional facilities. Although there were complaints of physical abuse at all of the facilities, we received the most complaints about the East Baton Rouge-LTI (EBR-LTI).7 Most of the children interviewed at EBR-LTI told us that they had either experienced or witnessed physical abuse. Many of the children interviewed were so inured to the physical abuse that they expected it as a matter of course. The problemis compounded by the fact that there is no functioning complaint system by which the children may bring these abuses to the attention of higher authorities. Human Rights Watch recommends that the physical abuse of the children be strictly prohibited and punished. Moreover, a functioning and effective complaint system should be instituted to enable the children to seek redress for instances of abuse.
Another serious problem is in the area of discipline. The Human Rights Watch Children's Rights Project found that discipline is administered in an arbitrary manner. As punishment, children are often confined in isolation cells for substantial periods of time without access to reading materials, emerging from the cells only once a day to take a shower. This is contrary to both the substance and the purpose of the international standards and U.S. constitutional law which clearly require that isolation be used only where children pose an immediate threat to themselves or others and further state that the confinement of children is for the purpose of treatment, not punishment. There is also an excessive use of restraints. Handcuffs are used regularly to restrain children after a fight until they are placed in isolation. Furthermore, many of the children told us that they were beaten while handcuffed. Human Rights Watch recommends that the institutions stop the use of disciplinary isolation. Human Rights Watch further recommends that the use of restraints be prohibited except where all other control methods have been exhausted and have failed and only in order to prevent the children from hurting themselves or others.
In response to the question,"what would you most like to change here?", virtually every child at all of the facilities, except for Bridge City-LTI, responded that they would like the guards to stop hitting them and that they would like more food. The inadequacy of the portions of food served to the children was alleged in almost all the interviews. Children consistently told us that they were hungry. Human Rights Watch recommends that the portions of food served to the children be increased.
The physical conditions in which the children are confined offer no privacy. The children sleep in large dormitories and must take care of all their physical needs in full view of others. Human Rights Watch believes that the failure to accord the children even a small amount of privacy strips them of the basic sense of respect and dignity that is essential to their treatment and reintegration into society. Human Rights Watch recommends that the physical environment in which children are confined be changed so as to afford children privacy while using the toilet facilities.
The common problem of overcrowding, and the sanitary and violence problems associated with overcrowding and inadequate staffing, generally do not exist at the Louisiana institutions. The juvenile institutions in Lousiana are governed by a Federalcourt ordered stipulation and consent decree which sets out maximum population limits, mandates staffing levels and requires compliance with all state health and fire rules.
Human Rights Watch's detailed recommendations appear at the end of this report.
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child8 (CRC) is the most important international document concerning children's rights. The CRC deals directly with confinement conditions in: section 37 which sets out the right to be free from torture and, when detained, to be treated with humanity. Other relevant provisions of the CRC that do not deal specifically with childen who are detained include: the right to maintain contact with parents, the right of free expression, the right to health and the right to education.
Five other international documents are relevant to children in confinement: the U.N. Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of Their Liberty (U.N. Rules);9 the U.N. Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (Beijing Rules);10 the U.N. Guidelines for the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency (Riyadh Guidelines);11 the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (Prisoners' Rules);12 and the Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons Under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment (Principles).13 These standards, except for the Prisoners' Rules, have been recognized by the international community by adoption as General Assembly resolutions. The Prisoners' Rules were approved by the Economic and Social Council by resolutions in 1957 and 1977. The Prisoners' Rules and Principles are standards applicable to adults and incorporated by reference into the standards applicable to children. The adult standards are never more rigorous thanthose applicable to children and are frequently less onerous.14 The U.N. Rules, the Beijing Rules and the Riyadh Guidelines are applicable exclusively to children in the justice system. The first deals most thoroughly with conditions of confinement and will be referred to most often in the body of this report. All of the international standards stress throughout that children in confinement are entitled to rehabilitative treatment and that states are obliged to provide such treatment. The objective of the treatment is to facilitate a successful reintegration into society.
Applicable international standards will be outlined at the beginning of each descriptive section in the second part of the report. The full texts of all of the standards pertaining specifically to children appear in the appendix to this report.
When a government takes someone into its custody, it has an obligation to ensure that the conditions in which the person is confined do not violate the person's human rights and that, at the very least, minimal standards of decency are guaranteed.
The U.S. federal government has not established standards for the treatment of children in confinement in the U.S.
The U.S. courts have established standards under the United States Constitution. The eighth amendment to the United States Constitution protects adult prisoners from conditions that amount to "cruel and unusual punishment." Children are entitled to a higher standard of care, as they are not "convicted" of crimes. U.S. constitutional law protects incarcerated children from conditions that "amount to punishment"15 under thefourteenth Amendment.16 Although children used to have a right to rehabilitation and treatment,17 the obligation to provide treatment has been overturned. Now children are only protected from "unreasonable restraint." There is no right to treatment, except to the extent that it is necessary to prevent unreasonable restraint.18
The American Correctional Association (ACA) is the leading source of standards for juvenile and adult detention and correctional institutions in the U.S. The ACA describes itself as a "private, nonprofit organization that administer[s] the only national accreditation program for all components of adult and juvenile corrections." Its purpose is to "promote improvement in the management of correctional agencies through the administration of a voluntary accreditation program and the ongoing development and revision of relevant, useful standards."19 Facilities in the corrections system apply to the ACA for accreditation and are subject to a lengthy application process which includes an on-site review of the facilities' compliance with the applicable standards. The accreditation is strictly voluntary. The standards are detailed. Many of the standards require facilities to develop policies regarding, for example, suicide prevention or medical emergency responses, but do not address the effectiveness of the implementation of those policies. All of the Louisiana state juvenile correctional facilities are ACA-accredited and the one private secure facility is required by its contract with the Department of Corrections to become accredited. The ACA standards do not comply in all regards with international law or U.S. constitutional law.20
The OJJDP has granted funds to Abt Associates, Inc. to develop performance-based standards for institutions detaining juveniles. The project is in the preparatory stages.
Two departments within the U.S. Department of Justice are concerned with the conditions in which children in the justice system are confined.
The first, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), was established in 1974 under the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (the Act).21 The mandate of the Act is extremely broad. Its stated purposes include: providing for evaluation of federally assisted juvenile justice and delinquency prevention programs; developing national standards for the administration of juvenile justice; and assisting state and local governments in improving the administration of justice. States that are assisted under the formula grants program under the Act used to be monitored by the OJJDP to ensure that status offenders are not held in secure confinement and that children are not held with adults. Since the Reagan administration, compliance with these requirements has been verified essentially through self-reporting by the states. The reports of the states are not monitored by the OJJDP.22 There is no general monitoring of the conditions in which children adjudicated delinquent are confined.
The OJJDP itself has not established standards for the conditions in which children are confined. The Act does, however, prohibit the incarceration of status offenders23 in secure facilities and requires that children adjudicated as juveniles are not confined with adults. The office is authorized under the Act to make grants and to enter into technical assistance contracts. The funds are allocated on an annual basis among the states according to the relative population of children.
In 1995 Louisiana will receive $1,128,000 from the OJJDP. In earlier years the allocation was less than one million dollars. An official with the state advisory group24 told Human Rights Watch that the funds allocated to Louisiana were never sufficient to enable the state to carry out the Act's mandates effectively. In an attempt tostreamline the efforts to carry out the Act's mandate, the state advisory group has determined that OJJDP funds will be used only for pre-adjudication programs or alternative programs, leaving all secure facilities to the Department of Public Safety and Corrections (DPSC). The only funding given to the DPSC is an annual allocation of $25,000 for the parenting program at Monroe-LTI. This parenting program will be referred to in more detail in the section on education and programming below.
In August 1994 the OJJDP published a research report commissioned by it and prepared by Abt Associates, Inc. entitled "Conditions of Confinement: Juvenile Detention and Corrections Facilities." The report set out the findings of a major research effort into the conditions in which juveniles are incarcerated around the U.S. In assessing the conditions Abt Associates, Inc. referred to five nationally recognized sets of standards, but used the ACA standards as its primary resource.25 The report found substantial deficiencies in institutions around the country in the areas of living space, security, control of suicidal behavior and health care. In the area of living space the report found a systemic problem of overcrowding. The most serious security issues found were the high escape rate and the number of injuries from violence despite adequate staffing. Prevention of suicide planning was found to be uncoordinated and insufficient. Finally, in the area of health care, health screenings were not being done promptly after a child's commitment to a facility. The other areas investigated by the researchers were: food, clothing and hygiene, living accomodations, sanitation, fire and life safety, education, recreation, mental health services, access to the community and limits on staff discretion. The report found some deficiencies in all areas.
The second department involved with the children in the justice system is the Civil Rights Division - Special Litigation Section, which operates under a mandate toenforce the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (Institutionalized Persons Act).26 The Special Litigation Section also has the authority to enforce the right to special education under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)27 and has used that act to enforce educational rights of children with disabilities in confinement. However, most of the IDEA litigation is undertaken by private organizations and law firms at the instigation of the aggrieved individuals. Under the authority of the Institutionalized Persons Act, the Special Litigation Section is given the right to bring actions for equitable relief, such as injunctions and court orders, against any state or political subdivision of a state, or any official of the state, that is violating the constitutional rights of persons or any other federal laws protecting the rights of institutionalized persons. Essentially the act provides an enforcement mechanism for the constitutional rights of children in confinement outlined earlier. The mechanism appears to be under-used on behalf of children in confinement. The Department of Justice only uses its power responsively, bringing suits where there have been substantial complaints about a facility. One attorney with the Department of Justice told us that in her opinion the Department of Justice was ignoring children, partly because there was very little sympathy in the current and former administrations for prisoner's rights, in particular for child prisoners. Mark Soler, President of the Youth Law Center, described the Department of Justice's record on protecting confined children as "mixed" and said that "for years there have been problems with the follow through at the Department of Justice."28
SECURE CONFINEMENT IN LOUISIANA
There are four secure correctional facilities for children in Louisiana. Correctional facilities house children between the ages of eleven and seventeen29 adjudicated as offenders and ordered by the court to be confined in a state facility. The state-run facilities are called the Louisiana Training Institutes (LTI). They are: the East Baton Rouge-LTI (EBR),30 Monroe-LTI and Bridge City-LTI. The EBR-LTI campus is also the site for the Juvenile Reception and Diagnostic Center (JRDC). All children in Louisiana subject to incarceration in an LTI, whether the institution is specified by the court or not, are sent first to JRDC. The average length of stay at JRDC is about four weeks. During that time the children are evaluated for mental and physical health, educational ability and risk factors, such as aggressivity, to determine where they should be most appropriately placed in the system. The LTI's are ostensibly designed to care for different classes of children. Bridge City-LTI is the least secure environment and is where the children who are considered emotionally fragile or who have displayed low aggressivity are generally sent.31
The fourth facility that houses children for the state is the Tallulah Correctional Center for Youth (TCCY). The facility is run by TransAmerican Development Associates, Inc. and was built on contract with the town of Tallulah. The location was chosen for economic development purposes.32 The Department of Public Safety and Corrections (DPSC) pays a per diem for each child incarcerated at TCCY on behalf of the state. TCCY opened in November 1994.
The racial composition of the children incarcerated at the institutions is predominantly African-American. On August 24, 1995, the percentage of African-American children at the institutions was as follows: EBR-LTI -84 percent; Monroe-LTI - 88 percent; Bridge City-LTI - 73 percent and TCCY - 80 percent.33 The racial composition of the staff at the institutions is also predominantly African-American. On August 24, 1995, the percentage of African-American staff at the institutions was as follows: EBR-LTI -87 percent; Monroe-LTI - 69 percent; Bridge City-LTI - 83 percent and TCCY - 78 percent.34
Conditions in the three LTI's are monitored under a Federal court order, administered by Judge Frank Polozola, in the United States District Court, Middle District of Louisiana. The court's order arose out of litigation started in 1971 surrounding the conditions at the Lousiana State Penitentiary at Angola. In 1981, the court extended its jurisdiction to include conditions in all state penitentiaries, parish prisons, and other penal institutions, including juvenile institutions. In 1983 the court set interim population levels for the five then existing juvenile institutions operated by the DPSC, pending a report by the DPSC on the conditions at the institutions. Finally, in 1984, the DPSC entered into a consent decree and stipulation with the court35 pursuant to which the DPSC agreed to maintain conditions, limitations and standards at the juvenile institutions under its supervision and control as set out by the court.
The court set population limits and minimum staffing requirements for the institutions which could be modified only by application to the court. The court also required that the facilities comply with all applicable health and fire rules and any other regulations adopted pursuant to Louisiana law which affect the health and safety of offenders. Finally the court required that an annual report be submitted to it by each institution setting out the populations, staffing levels and the number of violent incidents in certain categories, including assaults and suicides. The court continues to exercise its jurisdiction over the juvenile institutions to the present time. A court-appointed expertmonitors the institutions, receiving complaints and reports on occurrences at the institutions.
The conditions at TCCY are also monitored by Judge Polozola. The facility was opened pursuant to a stipulation and consent decree dated November 15, 1994, setting a population limit and requiring that TCCY begin the process of securing ACA accreditation. TCCY encountered significant problems maintaining control of the children housed at the facility during November and December. During the period from November 16, 1994, to December 29, 1994, there were eighty reports of assault incidents between the children.36 As a result of the problems at TCCY the court declared a state of emergency at the facility on December 22, 1994, and has been closely monitoring the situation at TCCY since then. A motion by the DPSC to vacate the state of emergency was denied on June 22, 1995.
The U.N. Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty and the U.N. Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners set out detailed specifications of the physical environment in which children can be confined. These standards, although non-binding, have been recognized by the international community by adoption as General Assembly resolutions. They are an authoritative statement of the international community's agreement on the minimum standards that should be adhered to in the confinement of children by the state.
Rules 27 to 37 of the U.N. Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty deal specifically with the physical environment that should be created by facilities which detain children in the justice system. The U.N. Rules generally require that the physical environment promote health and human dignity and to that end the design of the facilities is to be in keeping with the rehabilitative aim of the juvenile justice system. The requirements call for small-scale facilities, and where possible facilities with no or minimal security measures. Closed facilities are required to be small enough to enable individualized treatment. Sleeping should be in small dormitories or individual rooms and sanitary installations should afford the children privacy. The right to privacy includes the basic right to the possession of personal effects. Children also have the right to wear their own clothing to the extent possible.
Rule 60 of the U.N. Rules gives children the right to receive regular and frequent visits, at minimum once a month, but preferably once a week. Rule 61 of the U.N. Rules entitles children to write letters or telephone at least twice a week.
Because U.S. constitutional law also protects children from conditions that amount to punishment, courts have found that children are entitled to greater privacy than adults. Some courts have required single rooms, other courts have set limits on the number who may be housed in a dorm and have required privacy in toilet areas.37
The physical environment and conditions in each facility will be described below.
East Baton Rouge-Louisiana Training Institute
The East Baton Rouge-LTI38 has a court-approved capacity of 580. On the first day that Human Rights Watch visited the facility in March 1995, 496 boys and eighty-four girls were housed on the campus. EBR-LTI is the only institution that houses girls. On the first day Human Rights Watch was at the facility, nine of the eighty-four girls were pregnant. On the second day that Human Rights Watch visited in May 1995, the population count for the girls was eighty-three, seven of whom were pregnant. According to Superintendent Lewis at EBR-LTI, the average length of stay at the facility is seventeen months. In the JRDC it is four weeks, although an official with the DPSC told HRW that JRDC processing could be done in five days.39 The facility is located outside of Baton Rouge, about a twenty-minute drive from the city. It is located on the edge of an industrial district; there is no visible residential district in the area. The grounds of the facility are enclosed by a high chain-link fence with intermediate size razor wire coiled on the top of the fence. There are large open green spaces interspersed throughout the campus, including an outdoor playing field. Thereare very few trees on the property . All of the buildings, except the building which houses the large indoor gymnasium, are either red or yellow brick. The gymnasium building appears to be grey aluminum siding. There are two condemned buildings on the grounds. The JRDC is located on the same campus, but is separated from the main campus by a chain-link fence. The physical environment at JRDC is virtually the same as the main campus; however, the children are not provided with any education and their recreational and work options are restricted. It is, therefore, more punitive to remain at JRDC for a longer period of time, and it denies children the right to be educated while confined.40
The dormitories house between forty and fifty children. Each dormitory is in a separate brick building. The buildings are one or two stories high and have a sleeping room, a common room and a bathroom area. The common rooms are generally bare except for a television set, some chairs and on occasion some magazines or a deck of cards. The sleeping rooms are generally furnished with metal double-bunk beds with thin plastic-covered mattresses that run along the perimeter of the room, spaced approximately two and one-half feet apart. There are windows in the room. The children are provided with pillows and blankets, and HRW was told by staff that children are given fresh linen each day. There is a bathroom area adjacent to the sleeping room which has three showers and four toilets. None of these are enclosed to provide privacy in any way. There are three toilets in a small room off the common area; the toilets are set side by side against a wall with no dividing partitions. There is a pay phone and a water fountain in the common room. The dormitories were clean on the day Human Rights Watch visited the facility, and none of the children interviewed indicated that sanitary conditions were a problem.
Other problems were identified with the physical environment. TD,41 age fifteen, said that she was told when to go to the bathroom and that when she asked permission to go to the bathroom, her request was only granted "sometimes".
The children are issued jeans, t-shirts, sweatshirts, underwear, socks, a pair of running shoes, rubber boots and a rain jacket. The jeans have 'LTI' printed down one leg. Children are not allowed to wear their own clothing. Children who earn privileges at Monroe-LTI are able to wear some of their own clothing which suggests that there isno security reason for denying this right. Children may wear their own shoes if the medical staff certifies that it is necessary for health reasons.
Bridge City-Louisiana Training Institute
The Bridge City-LTI is located five minutes out of a residential district in Bridge City, which is located a half hour drive from New Orleans. The facility has a court-approved capacity of 150 children. On the first day that Human Rights Watch visited in March 1995, 144 children were on campus. The facility houses only boys. The facility has large outdoor spaces, a playing field and trees; flowers are planted each spring by children on a work detail at the facility. The buildings are for the most part brick; much of the facility was originally part of a religious girls school.
The dormitories house forty children per sleeping room. There are two sleeping rooms in each of the buildings that house children. The children sleep on metal double-bunk beds that are arranged along each of the long walls with two foot lockers underneath each bed. There are windows along the same wall. The children are provided with blankets and pillows and fresh linen weekly, more often if necessary. The bathroom off of the sleeping room has three showers, one toilet and one urinal. There are no dividing or privacy partitions in the bathroom area. There is a water fountain against the wall. In the recreation room there is a water fountain and a bank of phones against the wall and an adjoining bathroom with one toilet and one urinal.
The children are issued jeans, t-shirts, sweatshirts, running shoes, socks, underwear and jackets, and for Sundays they are issued khaki pants and shirts and black dress shoes. Their hair is shaved to a short stubble. They are neither able to wear their own clothing, nor wear longer hair. None of the other facilities require the children to shave their hair. It is a practise that enhances the harsh atmosphere, contrary to international standards which specify rehabilitation and treatment, not punishment.
Monroe-Louisiana Training Institute
The Monroe-LTI is located in a residential area of the city of Monroe, next to a hospital. Monroe is in the north of Lousiana, approximately three and a half hours from Baton Rouge by car. It has a court-approved capacity of 356. On the day that Human Rights Watch visited in May 1995, it was below capacity but waiting for the arrival of children being sent from other facilities for disciplinary purposes. The facility houses only boys. When the campus was first built it was simply integrated into the surrounding neighborhood without fences. As a result the campus has createda normal environment with named city streets running through it, large open green spaces, a playing field, trees, flowers and even sidewalks. The buildings are almost all red or yellow brick of varying sizes.
In the early 1980s the closed campus was created. Monroe-LTI is composed of an open and a closed campus, although both campuses are secure. The closed campus is separated from the open campus by an extra fence. All entrances to the closed campus from the open campus are secured by correctional officers. Children from all of the LTI's and TCCY who are judged by the facilities to be incorrigible are sent to the Monroe-LTI closed campus. The closed campus has four dormitories and also maintains twenty-four isolation cells in another dormitory. Confinement to the closed campus is administered in stages as part of a three-level behavior program, beginning with a child's assignment to an isolation cell and graduating to the dormitories as his behavior is judged to be modified appropriately. The chain-link fence around the whole facility was erected in 1984, and in 1993 all of the fences were topped with large size coiled razor wire at the direction of the then new Governor Edwin Edwards's correctional administration.
The dormitories are spread throughout the campus and house between thirty-four and forty-four children each. The buildings vary between single-story, two-story and three-story buildings. The three-story dormitory has one floor of administrative offices. The children sleep in metal double- bunk beds arranged around the perimeter of the room. There is one toilet and one urinal in the sleeping room itself. The adjoining bathroom has no partitions between the showers, toilets and urinals. The numbers of each vary with the size of the dormitory. In one dormitory housing thirty-four children there were five showers, two urinals and three toilets.
The children are issued sweatshirts, t-shirts, jeans and running shoes, as at the other LTI's. At Monroe-LTI, however, there is also a point system that rewards good behavior under which a child may be entitled to get some of his own clothes sent to him for use at the facility. Monroe-LTI is the only facility that operates such an incentive system.
Tallulah Correctional Center for Youth
Tallulah Correctional Center for Youth is located in the town of Tallulah in the north of Louisiana, about a half hour drive from Monroe and three and a half hours from Baton Rouge. The facility has a court-approved capacity of 396. On the day that Human Rights Watch visited in May 1995, there were 395 children on the campus. There are plans to expand the facility by 350 beds, 240 of which will be single cellisolation and administrative segregation cells. Although the ground has been broken for the new building, progress has been held up due to the state of emergency declared by the federal court, described earlier.
All the buildings look alike, with gray siding and concrete floors; they are placed close together. The buildings are connected by concrete walkways, and the dormitories are enclosed by high chain-link fences. There is no grass on the property and no playing field. The gymnasium consists of a concrete floor and a roof held up by posts. This is also the visiting area. The whole facility appears to be cramped, institutional and drab, particularly in comparison to the open green spaces of the state-run facilities.
All the dormitories are identical: one-room buildings with concrete floors. Forty children live in each dormitory. Twenty double-bunk beds are arranged in two rows along one wall in each. Underneath each bed are two unlocked foot lockers. Each dormitory has three long grey tables with long benches on either side and a television in the corner nearest the tables. There is a water fountain and four pay phones. Four toilets are separated from the showers by a partition and there is a low partition between the toilets. There are two urinals and six showers.
The children wear unmarked t-shirts, sweatshirts, jeans and sneakers. On the day that Human Rights Watch visited the facility, it was raining heavily. The children were not wearing rain jackets. Some of the children interviewed told Human Rights Watch that a confrontation early in the winter was sparked partly by the fact that the children were not issued coats for the colder weather. The children are not allowed to wear their own clothing.
When TCCY first opened, on November 16, 1994, there were significant problems in the operation of the facility. The staff hired by TransAmerican Develpment Associates, Inc. were unable to keep control of the children. Some children told HRW that they were moved to the facility without being told where they were going and once at the facility were given conflicting information about the length of time they would spend at TCCY and the nature of their program. Two children who had been confined at the facility since the opening described being awoken at 3:00 A.M.. at EBR-LTI and being told to take off all their clothes and to put on the new ones issued from TCCY. They were then bused up to TCCY in the middle of the night without being told where they were being taken.
The DPSC assumed operational authority of the facility on December 29, 1994, pursuant to a Federal court-declared state of emergency at TCCY, on December 22,after an accumulation of disturbances made it clear to the court that order could not be maintained under the administration of the private management services corporation.42 Until the court declared a state of emergency authorizing the DPSC to assume operational control, there had been no indication that the DPSC would involve itself in a resolution of the problems. Human Rights Watch was told by Superintendent Goodwin at TCCY that the security system has been brought under control and that the administration of the facility is now operated more effectively. There was, however, a confrontation between the staff and the children in a dormitory on April 19, 1995, which suggests that the security system is still not as effective as it should be and that the children do not have sufficient respect for the security system.
Although the reasons for the disturbance are not clear, the children in one dormitory were reported to be "loud, unruly and causing chaos" all evening.43 The situation escalated when the children began throwing shoes and deodorant at the correctional officers. The correctional officers set off "Clear Out," a chemical agent, and left the dormitory. The children began "destroying" the dormitory, "knocking the T.V. down, pulling the water fountain off the wall, pulling sinks and urinals off the wall [and] overturning bunks." More Clear Out was set off and several of the children put towels, sheets and pillowcases around their faces. The situation was brought under control, and the children were removed and restrained within one hour. The forty-one children in the dormitory were dispersed to be housed as follows: "Nineteen were placed in segregation (the total count of this unit is twenty), fourteen were placed in the ward in the infirmary (this ward normally holds up to six offenders), eight were placed in the intake room in the segregation unit, and three were placed in the isolation rooms in the infirmary." There were no significant injuries to staff or children. HRW does not have sufficient information to determine whether the response to the riot was appropriate.
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS ON PHYSICAL CONDITIONS
The facilities described above fail to comply with international standards in many respects. Although contrary to both international law standards and ACA standards,the state facilites in Louisiana use large dormitories exclusively. All of the standards recommend the use of single cells or at minimum small dormitories.44 The large dormitories and the open bathrooms afford the children absolutely no privacy at any time in their daily lives. Large dormitories have also been found to be directly and positively linked to child-on-child injury and the increased use of isolation to control juvenile behavior.45 Many children told HRW about getting into fights in their dormitories, or being picked on by other children in their dormitories. During the period from July 1994 to July 1995, there were 614 incidents of child-on-child assaults at Monroe-LTI, 545 incidents at EBR-LTI and eighty-three at Bridge City-LTI.46 Frequently physical abuse by the correctional officers (which will be described later in the report) occurs in the process of breaking up a fight between children in a dormitory.
The physical environment of all the facilities, but EBR-LTI and TCCY in particular, is punitive. The size of the facilities precludes individualized treatment to a large extent. Staff and children at the facilities told Human Rights Watch that isolation cells are often used to control the behavior of a child. The isolation cells are small and bare except for a bed, a toilet and a sink. There are generally no windows; where there are windows, they are so small that no significant natural light is let in, and they are covered by wire mesh. The doors have small windows for observation and slots through which food is passed at mealtimes. At Bridge City-LTI the isolation cells are painted a dark color on the walls, floors and ceilings. Placement in a dark cell andclosed or solitary confinement is absolutely prohibited by Rule 67 of the U.N. Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty.
The U.N. Rules also encourage contact between confined children and their families and communities. Rules 59-61 require regular visits, preferably once a week but at minimum once a month, and a right to twice weekly telephone calls and letter writing. All of the facilities have visiting day only once a month. They are contact visits which usually occur in a large open room or space at the facility, generally the gymnasium or a similar location. Parents are not permitted to bring food for their children on visiting day. Because of the size of the facilities there is no attempt to locate facilities in the communities from which the children come. A substantial percentage of the children come from the urban areas, in particular Orleans Parish. Yet Bridge City-LTI, the closest facility to the parish, is the smallest and least secure facility. Because of the travel distances to the facilities, many of the children never receive visitors, and most do not have visitors every month.
Telephone calls are generally permitted every night from the pay phones in the common rooms in the dormitories. Many children told HRW that their parents cannot afford to pay the collect phone charges, so they do not speak with their parents on a regular basis. At Monroe-LTI the counsellors are required to make a phone call to the parents of each child in their care once a month at the facility's expense.47 This system ensures that the children speak with their parents at least once a month.
The children said they are unable to call their lawyers because the lawyers will not accept the collect charges. There is also no privacy when making the phone calls, as the phones are located on a wall in the common room. Some children told us that they were denied the opportunity to make phone calls by other children in their dormitory. Others said that the length of time they were given to use the phone was restricted by the staff to between three and eight minutes. When the children are placed in disciplinary segregation, there does not appear to be any opportunity to use the telephone, as the children are not permitted to leave the isolation cell except once a day to take a shower. Human Rights Watch, however, was not told of any specific rule that prevented the children from using the telephone while segregated from the rest of the population.
Writing paper and stamped envelopes are not uniformly or regularly supplied to the children. Many of the children said that they get writing paper, pencils and stampsfrom their parents. It is an article commonly included in the packages sent to the facilities by parents. There does not appear to be any institutional encouragement to write letters.
The location of the institutions, the overall environment of monthly visits, shortened telephone calls, if any are made at all, and irregular letter writing do not foster contacts between the children and their families. Children at all the facilities told Human Rights Watch that they rarely saw their counsellors, whose role it is to provide guidance, counselling and individual attention to the children. Strengthening contacts with family and other persons in their home community and individual attention from a counsellor are considered by international standards to be an integral part of creating a treatment environment.48
Children are subject to different disciplinary standards than those that apply to adults, because under international standards the purpose of a child's confinement is not punishment but rehabilitation and treatment.49 U.S. Constitutional law protects children from conditions that amount to punishment.50
Rule 67 of the U.N. Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty prohibits cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. It specifically prohibits corporal punishment and the use of solitary confinement under any circumstances. Rule 68 of the U.N. Rules requires that clear rules set out the conduct that constitutes a disciplinary offense and the sanction that will be imposed. Rule 24 of the U.N. Rules requires that upon admission to a facility, all children be given a copy of the governing rules of the institution.
U.S. Constitutional law cases have found that children may not be placed in isolation for purely disciplinary purposes; rather they "may only be placed in isolation whenthey pose immediate threats to themselves or other people."51 Moreover, isolation should be for as short a period of time as is necessary to enable a child's violent mood to subside. Giving a child books and writing materials in isolation reinforces its non-punitive nature.
When children are placed in isolation in LTI's52 they are not able to participate in any of the programming at the facilities. They are let out only to have a shower each day. They are not provided with anything to do, no books, no paper and pencil, no television. They are simply given nothing to occupy their time.
According to the ACA standards, disciplinary isolation may last a maximum of five days. This is the standard purportedly followed by the LTI's. This does not comply with the international standards set out above, nor does it appear to comply with the U.S. constitutional law decisions which restrict the use of isolation to instances where children pose an immediate threat to themselves or others, referred to above. Most children interviewed at all the institutions, except Bridge City-LTI, confirmed that disciplinary isolation generally lasted a maximum of five days. There were exceptions, however: TA at EBR-LTI told us that she had spent nine consecutive days in disciplinary lockdown. She also said that the guards sometimes refuse to let children out of the cells during the isolation period.
None of the children interviewed at Bridge City-LTI had been in lockdown, nor had they ever heard of anyone placed in lockdown. The lockdown log book at Bridge City-LTI confirmed that no child had been in the cells since November 1994. Human Rights Watch was told by Superintendent Harris that when isolation is used it is only for one hour at a time to bring a child's behavior under control.
Children are, however, placed in what the institutions call "protective custody", or administrative segregation, for longer periods of time than five days at all the facilitiesexcept Bridge City-LTI.53 The administrative segregation cells are identical to the isolation cells and frequently located in the same building. The use of administrative segregation gives the institutional administration a power which is open to abuse and arbitrary use. There is no clear monitoring system or system of review at the correctional facilities to ensure that this power is not abused or over-used. Institutions use administrative segregation excessively.
At TCCY, 240 of the 350 new beds being built will be single cells for use as administrative segregation cells and isolation cells.54 At EBR-LTI, the staff uses what is called "pre-disciplinary detention" in the isolation cells. A child can spend up to three days in an isolation cell, prior to a determination that disciplinary isolation is required.
Children reported that isolation is used frequently. UB, at EBR-LTI, said that on the day before she talked with us, she had been placed in isolation for seven hours simply for dancing. OK, age eighteen, at EBR-LTI, said that he was put in isolation for a "couple of hours" just for talking in the dining hall. At Monroe-LTI, one child alleged there was corruption in the isolation practices:
C KJ, age eighteen, said: "Some of the guards are crooked, they ask for your money or else it's lockdown. [It's] cold [and] they take everything away from you and [you have] just your pj's."
Several children reported that isolation cells were cold. At TCCY children in isolation prior to disciplinary hearings are provided with a mattress at all times, however, once a child is found "guilty" of a violation, the mattress is taken away between the hours of 6:00 A.M.. and 9:00 P.M. during his time in isolation. Human Rights Watch was not told about the use of this practice at any of the other facilities.
Human Rights Watch was told by each of the superintendents of the facilities that the use of restraints was confined to circumstances where children needed to be brought under control or where they were being transported. None of the children interviewed said that they had either experienced or witnessed the application of handcuffs orshackles as punishment. However, a number of children told Human Rights Watch that they had either experienced or witnessed correctional officers placing handcuffs on a child to restrain him and then proceeding to beat him while he was restrained. In other instances where the use of restraints was described, it was unclear whether the restraints were a necessary security measure or an abuse of the power to restrain the children. DM, age nineteen, who had escaped from Monroe-LTI in 1993, told us that he is forced to wear shackles at all times, except when he is confined to his room. He was wearing shackles when HRW spoke with him. This unnecessary and cruel use of shackles is contrary to the international standards cited above.
The international standards require that on admission children be given a copy of the rules and that the information contained in the rules be conveyed to them in a "manner enabling full comprehension."55 Many of the children told us that they had not received a rule book upon arrival at the facility in which they were incarcerated. Being given a copy of the rules does not in itself guarantee that the rules will be applied fairly as written. Both children who had received a copy of the rules, and those who had not, told us that the "real" rules were created and applied at the discretion of the staff on duty. UB, at EBR-LTI, said that she got a copy of the rules, "but I didn't read them, because they don't run the institutes by the rules book." KM, age twenty, at EBR-LTI, said, "rules change every day."
Human Rights Watch has reviewed the book of rules. It is drafted in complex language that is difficult to understand. It is unlikely that a reading of the rule book would provide adequate notice to the children of their rights and obligations, given the language in which it is written.56 Secretary Richard Stalder of the DPSC told us that he wanted to change the language of the rules to make them more accessible to both staff and children.57
International law is clear and consistent in its prohibition of torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. The prohibition is contained in the Convention on the Rights of the Child at article 37(a).58 The U.N. Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice prohibit corporal punishment in Article 17.3, and Rules 63 and 64 of the U.N. Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty prohibit the use of restraints or force in any case unless all other control methods have been exhausted and failed.59 A violation of any of these provisions is physical abuse. In accordance with the ACA standards, the DPSC has adopted a standard operating procedure that specifically restricts the use of physical force to instances of justifiable self-defense, protection of others, protection of property, and prevention of escapes, and then only as a last resort. Under the DPSC procedure, physical force is never justifiable as punishment.60
HRW received complaints of physical abuse at all of the facilities we examined. The frequency of abuse varied between the facilities. At the Bridge City-LTI only one child complained to us of abuse by a guard.61 The problem of physical abuse by security staff at the facilities is more serious at Monroe-LTI and TCCY; at EBR-LTI physical abuse is pervasive. Children told us that they had been beaten for just "looking at someone wrong." A former staff person of the DPSC told Human Rights Watch that correctional officers have told him that the abuse problem is worsening,but that they will not report the problem because they are afraid of losing their jobs and of the repercussions in their relations with other correctional officers.
Allegations of abuse varied widely from institution to institution. Secretary Stalder of the DPSC told Human Rights Watch that there is no systematic record of the number of allegations of abuse of children by staff.62
East Baton Rouge-Louisiana Training Institute
Children interviewed about the conditions at EBR-LTI said the following things about the physical abuse problem:
C EC, age seventeen, said : "[The] night shift don't like me ... one of my friends was beaten up. They are beating people like us because we look at them, a lot of people are fighting ... I got hit in the head with handcuffs three weeks ago ... [the guard] hit me with a basketball. I asked him why and he pressed against me and I stepped back because I thought that he was going to swing and the other guard held me down and hit me with handcuffs and kicked me."63
C BA, age sixteen, said: "[I have] been beaten up once by the guards, [he] used [his] fists. I was sitting on a bench and [he] said I was talking and hit me and gave me a [disciplinary] ticket and two days later I went to the [disciplinary] committee and they gave me work detail."
C DR, age fifteen, said: "I got in trouble with one of the guards, I was talking and watching TV [around] bedtime and said I hope that they send me to Tallulah or Bridge City so I can go home. A guard came from behind and jumped on my back and started kicking and punching me with his hands. I went to court the next day. I told mama and the judge called here and told them to put me in C wing [protective custody]. My eye was swollen and my lip busted, so mama knew. I couldn't fight back. It happened so quick. I didn't know what hit me."
C BN, age sixteen, said: "The guards round here beat you up. They use handcuffs and whatever they get their hands on ... Counsellors will let the guards beat you up."
C OK, age sixteen, said: "[Two weeks ago]my friend got hit with handcuffs over not moving a picnic table. He had a cut up by his eye, it was bleeding and left a scar, but he didn't have to get stitches ... We get mace thrown in our eyes when they try to break up fights."
C EJ, age seventeen, said: "They hit you for any reason, with handcuffs, with hands. I've been hit with hands twice because I messed up the count by accident. He pulled me to the side and smacked my head two times. I've lots of times seen people hit. [In] April [I saw] two guards sure beating [another boy]. One was holding him and one was beating him ... they bust his nose all up, there was a lot of blood, they sent him to Delta lockdown."
C UD, age seventeen, said: "In area one the guards beat you up with their hands...they beat CS up bad. They beat him up ... Sergeant G is the one who really beats you up. He beats you up for calling him Sergeant. [Sergeant G] slapped [CS] and cursed him. He asked to go to the infirmary and he said no ... [Sometimes] we be up in the dorm in the back; if you miss the count or talk in the dormitory they beat you up for that and if you get up to get water. [Sergeant G] is just doing it for the fun of it...One time the dorm was sick, we had a virus, and he beat us up for coughing. My friend, they took his mattress and made him sleep in the shower because of his coughing ... They rush for you to eat your food. If you don't rush they take your fork away and throw it away. They beat you if you are too slow. You have about three minutes to eat."
C ED, age sixteen, said: "I had a fight with a couple of them, they be hitting on you with handcuffs. I got hit in the head and had my teeth knocked out. It happened a lot."
C BA, age sixteen, said: "A couple of nights ago I was talking and got slapped across the face for it ... for messing the count up they punched me in the side of the face ... Mr. K jumped on me, put some black cut-off gloves on and [was] beating on me ... they said if we find out, you rat, then we'll come back after you ... the next morning I peed blood because he kicked me in the wrong spot ... he took me in a little room to beat me, a room on the side ofthe dormitory. [He said] "you seem to have a little problem" and then they just beat on you ... the guards break you up, and they beat you to break it up, sometimes they hit you with the handcuffs or the shackles and then put them on you and take you to infirmary."
C TM, age seventeen, described an incident in which he was not familiar with the shower rules and neglected to stand naked against the wall waiting for everyone to finish their showers. When he went to get his clothes, he said the guard,"hit me in the head, I fell down and he kicked me a couple times and then when I got up he hit me again." On another occasion TM said he witnessed two guards taking turns beating up two boys who had been fighting. He said, "they wrote a report saying that his black eye was caused by the other boy...[the guards] hit the fat boy in the head and stomach and stomped on him ... they did this right in front of everybody, then made us all go to bed early."
C TS, age nineteen, said: "One time he tried to get another guard to help beat me up ... in the dining hall, but not in front of everyone, in the little entrance way. First he put cuffs on, then started hitting me in the face and kicking me."
C KJ, age eighteen, said: "My first day there they had some suicide precaution, so I tried to say I was suicidal, so a guard asked me if I wanted to kill myself, so I said yeah so I could leave, but he just kicked me and hit me full in the side of the face. I was in full shackles and fell down and he kicked me out and so I shut up after that."
C UD said: "That's how come I came up here from EBR because a guard beat me and another guy up with a broom. It's going to court, but they say I was in a fight and he beat us up with a broom and got a few minor bruises."
C ED said: "I got hit one time by a sergeant with a book cause we weren't supposed to talk and I giggled and he made me get on my knees and he hit me on my head and my face."
C EM, age fifteen, said: "EBR, that's a messed up place. The guards will beat you. One of them named Mr.O, he has a thing called a 'house party', if you work on weekends, he wake you up at 5 A.M. . He calls you in the back where we take showers and beats you for a whole hour. When we go to mess hall to eat we have to count, and he tells you to come see, then he calls youinto the washroom and beats you up and another sergeant comes to beat you. It has only happened two times to me ... I would change EBR. [I would] fire all the workers cause they are just dirty. "New jacks" come in talking, and they beat them up for nothing. This boy at EBR with me, a guard broke his arm with a broom ... [there were] boys lying on the floor and the sarge picked up his chair and threw it at him and hit him. If you tell a counselor, all it's going to do is make it worse."
C KN, age fourteen, said: "That place [EBR] was the worst place ever. I wasn't used to it. They slapped me cause I shared food and a guard walked up and came up and slapped me in the face and then took me into the laundry room and hit me again. Guards call us rats and stuff and people are stupid. Even if they don't talk they get hit."
C BG, age eighteen, said: "All my ribs were purple at EBR. A new boy came in and I tried to help him so he wouldn't get beaten up, and then a guard pulled us both up and he slapped both of us and then he told me to raise my arms and he beat my ribs until they were purple and blue and I didn't tell my mom cause I knew she would start something."
C UB said: "Every day ... they be hitting on pregnant girls. [On Sunday] the pregnant girls didn't want to go in for bed rest, they were pushing and shoving them, [the guards] carry them, just holding them by their arms and legs, and [they] picked one of them up over their shoulders, [there were] probably five guards, one man dropped a girl on her back."
Ms. Gagneaux, the head nurse on staff at EBR-LTI,64 told Human Rights Watch that the most common illnesses for which children came to the infirmary were orthopedic injuries such as broken jaws, broken hands and broken noses. She said that there were a lot allegations of abuse made, and sometimes they were followed up, and that there were cases where children did not report the source of their injury to the nurse on duty. She also said that many of the allegations are found by staff to be unfounded. Human Rights Watch was not told of any systematic reporting of suspected cases of abuse by the medical staff.
Monroe-Louisiana Training Institute
Children interviewed about conditions at Monroe-LTI had the following things to say about physical abuse:
C ED, age sixteen, said: "They don't hit on you with handcuffs, but they hit you with their hands and they kick you with their boots. I haven't been hit here yet, not yet. I saw a guard punch a guy with his fist last Saturday. He went to the infirmary, his eye was swole."
C GD, age seventeen, said: "Stay your distance [from the guards]. People get hit every day, all the time. They use their hands and handcuffs."
C KJ, age eighteen, said: "In the past they were hitting. I've had my share of bruises and footprints on my face, but they are better."
C UD said: "Mr. X hit him in the face with a radio, and he hit CA with his fist and broke his nose. They be slapping you every now and then. Mr. Y, he hits people while they are asleep; somebody might talk, and he hits them."
C LJ, age sixteen, said: "I've been beat up a lot of times. I can't count, it be so many. They get some handcuffs and hit you up the side of the head and cut your head. They stomp on you when you fall down. A couple of days ago Mr. X hit a guy in the face with a radio ... they beat you up, they call you out where other offenders can't see you, in some room somewhere."
C RR, age seventeen, said: "When you fight, they bust you in the head with [handcuffs]. I've seen that about, I believe it was Friday, two dudes fighting, [the guard] put handcuffs over his fingers and put the key in to make a fist, then he hit them over the head; they complained, and they got their lawyers." Several other children told us about the same incident. Human Rights Watch was told by the children that the incident was under investigation. We were told by Superintendent Robert Dunavant that a recent abuse incident was under investigation, but we have heard nothing further on the matter.
A few of the children told Human Rights Watch that the guards at Monroe-LTI sold contraband to some of the other children. They said that nobody talked about it, and the children were not prepared to give the names of the guards involved. The court expert appointed by Judge Polozola confirmed that she had received similar complaints but that there was never enough evidence to pursue the complaints.
Tallulah Correctional Center for Youth
The children confined at TCCY made fewer complaints about physical abuse. Where abuse was reported, it was attributed to the DPSC security staff.
The children interviewed about conditions at TCCY said the following about physical abuse:
C BG, age eighteen, said: "It used to be alright but the DPSC came in and has to do their own thing. They beat you up and stuff ... they got a pack, three of them, and they run around and beat people up. My mama wants to check. [One time when there were] no white people in the cafeteria, so [the man serving the food] skipped me three times and then started punching me and others joined and said this be for 300 years ago what you did to my people."
C SC said: "I had my eardrum bust, March 22nd, the dormitory they stuck me out because I was the only one from Baton Rouge, the rest are from New Orleans, and the lieutenant punched me in the ear and busted my eardrum. I went to Conway hospital in Monroe ... I reported the ear drum. The nurse said she wrote it up, but you can't always listen to them and nothing happened."
A few children who had been at both TCCY and EBR-LTI commented that the security staff at TCCY were more understanding and more willing to talk rather than hit as compared to EBR-LTI.
Bridge City-Louisiana Training Institute
Of the children interviewed at Bridge City-LTI, only one mentioned physical abuse. The rest of the children interviewed said that they had never experienced physical abuse, nor had they witnessed it, at that facility. CM, age thirteen, said, "the guards here are better. They take their time with you, explain things." This sentiment was expressed by several children who told us that they liked the fact that the guards talked to them.
However, the abuse described by the one child at Bridge City-LTI was very serious:
C KG, age fourteen, said, "What had happened is this guard was walking around with a broomstick and he made a line of people and he hit guys ontop of the head and they fell down. The other day they were punishing us by making us hold our hands out for thirty minutes and one guy dropped his fingers and they came over and beat him up and threw a chair at him. Another punishment is thinking position. They make you hold up your weight on your elbows for ten minutes even if its only one guy who messed up; the skin rips off your arms and elbows ... one guard, he hits you with a cable wire, he wets your hand and arm and whips you."
U.N. Rules 75 and 76 provide that children should have the opportunity to make complaints and to be informed of the response without delay.
The Administrative Remedy Procedure (ARP) under which children in the Louisiana correctional facilities are entitled to complain to the superintendent about physical abuse is virtually never used. During the period from July 1994 to March 1995, the summary of ARPS65 prepared by each institution showed that there were no complaints of abuse at Bridge City-LTI and only one complaint of abuse at EBR-LTI. At Monroe-LTI, where, according to Superintendent Dunavant, the ARP system is functioning much more effectively, there were seventy-seven complaints of abuse during the same period of time. The number of complaints per month dropped dramatically after the first three months of the period reported. There is no reporting by TCCY.
The children we spoke to universally had no confidence in the system. Complaints are rarely made as a result of this lack of confidence, and when they are made there is frequently no response at all. Many of the children told us that when they wrote complaints they were ripped up by the guards when they gave the paper to them, or that the complaints were never passed on to the captain in charge. There is a strong fear of reprisal among the children.
C LJ, age sixteen, said: "If you write them up and they find out, they are away for a couple of days, and then they try to hit you up for anything you do."
Despite the existence of the ARP, Superintendent Elijah Lewis at EBR-LTI told us that he had no way of knowing how many children in total complained of abuse66 and how many staff members had been disciplined for abusing children. However, after our visit, he reported to Secretary Stalder that there had been ninety-two reported cases of alleged abuse; six of the cases had been confirmed and disciplinary action had been taken. There was no indication what the disciplinary action was.67 Three days after Human Rights Watch's second visit to EBR-LTI, a child complained that he had received lacerations to the head area and the correctional officer named was placed on forced leave. An investigation was conducted, and the complaint was substantiated. The correctional officer received an emergency verbal suspension.68
The children we talked to had the following to say about the ARP:
C EC, age seventeen, said: "I wrote a complaint and told the truth and the officer came and got me and we started fisting. Sometimes they tear them up...every time someone in the dormitory files a complaint, nothing has ever happened."
C DM, age nineteen, said: "They use physical force but when it goes down everything comes up clean, like nothing happens."
C BC, age twenty, said: "The guards write reports and say that the offenders hit first, that's why nobody did nothing about it."
C EK, age eighteen, said: "You can't beat their words. I wrote them up a couple times and I never got no response."
Rule 37 of the U.N. Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty provides that children must receive food of a quality and quantity to satisfy the standards of health and hygiene.
Virtually every child interviewed at all the facilities, except Bridge City-LTI, told Human Rights Watch that he was hungry. At Bridge City-LTI the children said that they received better quality food than at the other facilities and a sufficient quantity of food. At the other facilities the portions of food served are inadequate according to the children.
The children consistently made the following kinds of statements about the quantity of the food served:
C UB told Human Rights Watch that she had lost 31 lbs. since her arrival at the LTI.
C EC, age seventeen, said: "They don't feed us enough."
C BA, age sixteen, said: "The food tastes like soap."
C BN, age sixteen, said: "No taste to it. Don't get enough. Can't get full."
C OK, age sixteen, said: "Don't be enough."
The breakfasts and lunches served at the LTI's are funded by the federal government's school lunch program. In a meeting with the secretary of the DPSC, Human Rights Watch raised the issue of inadequate portions of food. The secretary agreed that there was a possibility that the portion sizes specified for the school lunch program might not be fixed with a view to the appetites of sixteen and seventeen-year-old boys. However, the secretary was of the opinion that all health and nutritional standards were met by the meals served at the LTI's.69 In response to Human Rights Watch's expressed concern, Superintendent Dunavant of Monroe-LTI offered to look into the possibility of increasing the portion sizes, noting that the portion specifications were a minimum requirement, not a maximum requirement. Human Rights Watch was not told whether the DPSC authorized any increase in portion size.
Although the quantities were said to be insufficient, there were fewer complaints about the quality of the food. Human Rights Watch was told by children who had been in several facilities that the quality of the food at EBR-LTI and JRDC was significantly worse than at the other two state-run facilities. There were complaints of meat and chicken being rare or raw in the middle. Some of the children complained about the sanitary conditions in the kitchens. KJ, age eighteen, who works in the dining hall at Monroe-LTI, said, "the cooks up here are dirty. They drop food on the floor and pick it up and serve it up." UM, age fourteen, said, "one day they dropped food on the floor and then picked it back up and gave it to us."
We had meals at both EBR-LTI and Monroe-LTI. We found the food to be adequate, though it lacked seasoning, particularly, we were told, to the Louisiana palate which is accustomed to salt. Human Rights Watch was also told by some children that the food on days that visitors came was invariably much better quality than on other days.
Article 28 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child provides that children have a right to education and that primary education must be compulsory and free. The right to education is reiterated in U.N. Rule 38. U.N. Rules 39 through 46 detail the parameters of the right to education, vocational training and work. The right includes education for children of compulsory school age and access to further education for children above compulsory school age. Article 26.6 of the Beijing Rules provides that children should not leave the institution at an educational disadvantage. U.N. Rule 47 sets out the children's right to a daily period of recreation, outdoors if possible, and additional daily time for leisure activities , like arts and crafts.
All of the facilities, except the JRDC section at EBR-LTI, have a school program and some time set aside each day, usually about one hour, for recreation. In general children attended school either in the morning or in the afternoon for three hours. There is no school for children housed at the JRDC. Since many of the children are found to be at a grade level below the one corresponding to their age, most of the schooling programs are alternative education programs. Many of the children interviewed by Human Rights Watch said that they had not been in school right before they were admitted to the institutions. The school provides basic education in math and literacy and builds on the child's education as he or she progresses.
The teachers are, for the most part, drawn from the school system in the area in which the institution is located. There is provision for special education at all the facilities, to some extent. Monroe-LTI appears to have the most highly developed staff ofteachers in the area of special education. Most of the children commented relatively favorably on school, saying that it was an acceptable way to pass time and was sometimes interesting.
All of the facilities provide classes to prepare children for their Graduate Equivalency Degree (GED). However, once a child achieves a GED there are no further educational opportunities. At Monroe-LTI, KJ, age eighteen, who wanted to take college courses, said, "If you are smarter, you don't get good education. It pays to be stupid, you get rewarded." Superintendent Dunavant told HRW that one child at Monroe-LTI did a teleconference course from Northeast University in Louisiana in 1994, but that college courses were not generally available. He also told us that when a child wants to go to college his approach is to try to convince a court to let the child out to attend college. Secretary Stalder of the DPSC told HRW that college courses were not possible because of lack of funds. The institutions have no policy of facilitating the pursuit of higher education .
Human Rights Watch visited each of the facilities on a weekday, at an hour during which the children, or at least some of them, would normally be in school. At every facility there were empty classrooms at the time the visit occurred and a substantial proportion of the children were not in school. At Bridge City-LTI most of the teachers were gone on the first day Human Rights Watch visited, apparently on training programs, but no one that Human Rights Watch spoke to was quite sure of where the teachers were.
EBR-LTI, but not JRDC, is fortunate enough to have the Model Continuum of Rehabilitative Care (MCRC) program, which is funded by a grant from the federal Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT). The program includes interaction with the parents, substance abuse treatment, aftercare, job placement and a large educational component. Children learn on computers, using a specially designed computer program which includes the Job Skills Education Program (JSEP). That program gives children the foundation for at least 350 different job prescriptions. The children who were participating in this program expressed satisfaction with the program, particularly the sense that the interactive computer program was like having their own personal tutor. Bridge City-LTI and Monroe-LTI recently received funding from the DPSC to set up the computer job training portion of the MCRC program.
Recreation at the facilities is inconsistently provided from facility to facility. Some of the children told HRW that during the recreational period at EBR-LTI they are often made to sit on the floor in the gym and do nothing for the entire hour; for outside recreation time the children said that they are often made to sit on the sidewalk. OK,age eighteen, said, "yesterday, I'm a dormitory rep, I go to a meeting and tell them the dormitory needs some outside rec, the man ain't letting us out, he come ready to hit because I told he didn't give us outside rec."
Many of the children at TCCY said that there was not enough to do at the facility and that there was more to do at EBR-LTI. The children at Monroe-LTI and Bridge City-LTI, except those in isolation, of course, generally said that they had lots of things to do and that the activities were interesting and, in some cases, enjoyable. At Monroe-LTI there is a "boys club" which operates a canteen and has various activities including pottery, pool and weights. The children interviewed at Monroe-LTI commented favorably on the club activities.
The three LTI's all provide vocational training. Monroe-LTI has the most highly developed vocational training program. It includes working as apprentices to various trades. On the day that Human Rights Watch visited, two children were helping to set up an air conditioning system in the school. The regular vocational programs focus on small engine repair, upholstery and carpentry.
There are also parenting skills programs, to differing degrees, at each of the LTI's. At Monroe-LTI the parenting program is operated on an annual grant of $25,000 from the state formula grant money distributed by the OJJDP and awarded through the State Advisory Group. The parenting program started out as a comprehensive program that included an overnight visit component. A small house was assigned for use by the program and set up to mimic a home. As part of the program the confined children's babies were able occasionally to spend an entire weekend in this monitored "home" situation with their parents. Human Rights Watch was told by an official who requested anonymity that although no problems ever occurred, the administration of Governor Edwards stopped the overnight visit component of the program, citing liability risks. Bridge City-LTI also has a parenting program, and EBR-LTI provides some parenting skills training to girls who are pregnant. When a girl has a child during her term at the LTI, the baby is taken from her immediately after delivery and placed in the care of a family member or put into foster care.
At Bridge City-LTI there is a program called the Short Term Offender Program (STOP). STOP is for children, boys only, who are generally first time property offenders. The boys are required to serve only ninety days in the program, which includes components on substance abuse and victim impact awareness. TCCY ostensibly has a Louisiana Intensive Training and Education Program, the "LITE" program, which is for boys serving shorter sentences, and a regular LTI program. The "LITE" program is supposed to be a boot camp program. The children interviewedsaid that there did not seem to be any difference between the two programs, and many were given conflicting information on which program they were participating in. Human Rights Watch was unable to discern the difference between the programs, and none of the children interviewed said that they were participating in boot camp type activities beyond some drills. However, Bridge City- LTI, which does not purport to be a boot camp, has an atmosphere more akin to a boot camp. At Bridge City -LTI the children's heads are shaved close and they are required to do marching style drills for at least one hour every day, often more, and sometimes for as much as four hours on the weekend.
International standards clearly enunciate the principle that children who are incarcerated are to be cared for and treated. The goal of the incarceration is to prepare children for their return to society. Incarceration is not for punishment, but rather for treatment. To that end the international standards develop the concept of "normalization." "Normalization" requires an institution to minimize the differences between life inside and life outside the institution. International standards encourage interaction between the children and their community, treatment with respect and dignity and the development of alternatives to incarceration.
The physical surroundings of the four correctional facilities foster intimidation and punishment. The programming and counselling are inadequate to provide a full treatment program and on the days Human Rights Watch visited, there was little evidence that the children were being treated with respect and dignity at most times. The total lack of privacy magnifies the punishment atmosphere of the institutions.
A judge in Orleans parish who did not want to be named said, "people may mouth treatment, but they don't mean it," and another judge in Jefferson parish told Human Rights Watch that the State was just "warehousing kids" in the LTI's and that he "did not have much confidence in the LTI's...I only send kids to LTI's as a last resort; you can't count on good, effective treatment." Even Superintendent Dunavant, of Monroe-LTI, told Human Rights Watch that keeping children in the LTI's until they are twenty-one years old means that when they are released, they cannot function as adults in society.70
Some children in the institutions told us that they are not getting treatment or preparation for reintegration into society. JK, age eighteen, who had been at Monroe-LTI for three and a half years said, "I'm somewhat institutionalized. When they keep you a long time it just makes it worse. If they would have some type of rehab. courses, it would be better."
EK, age nineteen, at Monroe-LTI, summed up the systemic and societal problems that are carried over to the LTI's, saying, "They just slap you up...I came from a family like that, that's all I had to go through all my life, being locked up ain't changing me...when they slap us up, it ain't doing nothing but pumping up anger in me...I mostly grew up in the system...since everyone telling me how it was, I knew I would be at LTI someday."
This sentiment was echoed by Dr. Cecile Guin who has worked in the field of juvenile justice in Louisiana for eighteen years. She said, "No one cares enough to rock the boat so that the system can be changed ... Once the youth enters a juvenile institution, his or her chances of becoming a productive member of society are significantly decreased ... It is more likely that the youth has serious educational deficiencies that are not addressed during incarceration, is brutalized one way or another through the system and is released at a full term date with little or no preparation for reintegration into society ... Louisiana has never really implemented a comprehensive treatment program in the state."
A particular issue that is symptomatic of the general treatment accorded to the children is that many are not even given the fundamental right to know when they are to be released from the facility, or they are given an adjudicated date of release by the court, but it is somehow modified or let to pass without formal extension of the date. According to the children we spoke with this is due to the fact that an aftercare plan has not yet been prepared for the child,71 or that there is no space yet in the alternative or aftercare program for which the child is slated, or that the child is simply not able to contact his or her lawyer before a court date so that he or she is then unable to make arrangements to attend court. The problem is particularly acute for the children from Orleans parish because of the large number of children from the parish who need an aftercare program and the lack of resources of the parish.
KN, age fourteen, said, "I seen a lot of people here that are supposed to go home but they never leave, it worries me because they take so long." At TCCY, SC said his release date was supposed to be March 7 (he was interviewed on May 3) but that he had heard nothing about his release and he could not get in touch with anyone because all the phone calls are collect and the lawyers do not accept the calls.
The overall atmosphere of the institutions, in particular EBR-LTI and TCCY, is one of hostility and anger. Very little appears to be done to assist children in their reintegration into society. Among the people Human Rights Watch spoke to in the institutions and outside of them, there seemed to be little hope that the children at the secure facilities would stay out of trouble once released.
Human Rights Watch offers the following recommendations regarding the human rights aspects of the confinement of children in Louisiana.
To the state of Louisiana:
C The Louisiana state government should develop mandatory standards that at minimum comply with international standards on the conditions of confinement for children and that are applicable to all public and private facilities.
C Physical abuse by staff against children should be strictly prohibited. Staff found to have abused children should be appropriately disciplined, including dismissal. Where appropriate, criminal charges should be brought against the staff. Staff should be fully informed of the rules and consequences concerning physical abuse of children.
C The Administrative Remedy Procedure should be made accessible and effective. The ARP should be written in clear language that can be easily understood and should be fully explained to children upon their arrival at an institution. Steps should be taken to ensure that the ARP is readily accessible, including the availability at all times of the proper forms on which to file a complaint. At each institution the ARP should be administered by a person independent of the institutional administration who can receive complaints without the involvement of security staff. Complaints should be responded to and thoroughly and promptly investigated.
C Health care personnel should be employees of the Department of Health or other entity separate from the DPSC in order to have the independence required to report suspected abuse.
C Isolation should never be used as a disciplinary measure.
C Administrative segregation should be used only where absolutely necessary for the protection of a child. A decision to place a child in administrative segregation should be promptly and systematically reviewed.
C Pre-disciplinary isolation should never be used, as it is punishment without benefit of due process.
C Instruments of restraint like handcuffs or shackles should be used only where all other control methods have been exhausted and failed, and only where necessary to prevent the child from causing self-injury or injury to others.
C Handcuffs and shackles should never be used as punishment. Handcuffs and shackles should not be used a means of preventing escape unless all other control methods have been exhausted and failed and where is no less intrusive method is available.
C Denial of access to reading matter should never be used as a disciplinary measure.
C Denial of outdoor time should never be used as a disciplinary measure. Children should be allowed at least one hour of daily outdoor exercise.
C The use of large dormitories should be phased out.
C The physical environment in which children are confined should be changed so as to afford children privacy while using the toilet facilities. Ideally each institution should contain single person rooms with toilet facilities contained within the room, as preferred by both international and national standards. As an interim measure, toilet facilities should be partitioned.
C In any future construction of correctional facilities for children, the DPSC should build smaller facilities and should make every effort to confine children as close to their homes as possible to facilitate the maintenance of family bonds, important to the social development and reintegration of the child in society.
C TCCY should be required to provide conditions which at minimum are consistent with the conditions at the state facilities.
C Children should be released on the date specified by the court. Children should be told in advance of their release dates and should be given the opportunity to contact their lawyer at the expense of the facility in advance of the court date.
C The institutions should develop a policy and practice of facilitating the pursuit of higher education by children who have completed their Graduate Equivalency Degrees.
C Education should be provided to children at the JRDC.
C The processing at JRDC should be completed within a reasonable time and, in any event, children should stay at JRDC for no longer than seven days.
C The institutions should provide adequate programming and educational instruction to ensure that the children are not spending their time without any activity. The purpose of the programming and education is to prepare the child for a successful reintegration into society.
C Children should be treated by staff with respect and dignity.
To the Federal government:
C The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention should, in accordance with the stated purposes of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, develop mandatory standards for the administration of juvenile justice. These standards should at minimum comply with international standards on the conditions of confinement for children and be applicable to all public and private facilities.
C The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention should, in accordance with the stated purposes of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, assist state and local governments in improving the administration of justice.
C The Office of Juvenile Justice and Deliquency Prevention should, in accordance with the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, monitor the states that participate in the formula grants program to ensure that status offenders are not held in secure confinement and that children are not held with adults.
C Congress should pass legislation expanding the mandate of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention to include a requirement to monitor the actual conditions of confinement for children in the justicesystem and states' compliance with U.S. constitutional law in the conditions of confinement for children.
The Department of Justice, in accordance with the mandate of the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act, should regularly initiate investigations into the conditions in which children are confined to determine that they are in compliance with U.S. constitutional law.
Convention on the Rights of the Child, G.A. res. 44/25, annex, 44 U.N. GAOR Sup
p. (No. 49) at
167, U.N. Doc. A/44/49 (1989).
The States Parties to the present Convention,
Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed in
the Charter of the United Nations, recognition of the inherent
dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of
the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace
in the world,
Bearing in mind that the peoples of the United Nations have, in
the Charter, reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights
and in the dignity and worth of the human person, and have
determined to promote social progress and better standards of
life in larger freedom,
Recognizing that the United Nations has, in the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights and in the International Covenants on
Human Rights, proclaimed and agreed that everyone is entitled to
all the rights and freedoms set forth therein, without
distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language,
religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin,
property, birth or other status,
Recalling that, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the
United Nations has proclaimed that childhood is entitled to
special care and assistance,
Convinced that the family, as the fundamental group of society
and the natural environment for the growth and well-being of all
its members and particularly children, should be afforded the
necessary protection and assistance so that it can fully assume
its responsibilities within the community,
Recognizing that the child, for the full and harmonious
development of his or her personality, should grow up in a family
environment, in an atmosphere of happiness, love and
Considering that the child should be fully prepared to live an
individual life in society, and brought up in the spirit of the
ideals proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, and in
particular in the spirit of peace, dignity, tolerance, freedom,
equality and solidarity,
Bearing in mind that the need to extend particular care to the
child has been stated in the Geneva Declaration of the Rights of
the Child of 1924 and in the Declaration of the Rights of the
Child adopted by the General Assembly on 20 November 1959 and
recognized in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (in
particular in articles 23 and 24), in the International Covenant
on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (in particular in article
10) and in the statutes and relevant instruments of specialized
agencies and international organizations concerned with the
welfare of children, '
Bearing in mind that, as indicated in the Declaration of the
Rights of the Child, "the child, by reason of his physical and
mental immaturity, needs special safeguards and care, including
appropriate legal protection, before as well as after birth",
Recalling the provisions of the Declaration on Social and Legal
Principles relating to the Protection and Welfare of Children,
with Special Reference to Foster Placement and Adoption
Nationally and Internationally; the United Nations Standard
Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (The
Beijing Rules) ; and the Declaration on the Protection of Women
and Children in Emergency and Armed Conflict,
Recognizing that, in all countries in the world, there are
children living in exceptionally difficult conditions, and that
such children need special consideration,
Taking due account of the importance of the traditions and
cultural values of each people for the protection and harmonious
development of the child,
Recognizing the importance of international co-operation for
improving the living conditions of children in every country, in
particular in the developing countries,
Have agreed as follows:
For the purposes of the present Convention, a child means every
human being below the age of eighteen years unless under the law
applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier.
1. States Parties shall respect and ensure the rights set forth
in the present Convention to each child within their jurisdiction
without discrimination of any kind, irrespective of the child's
or his or her parent's or legal guardian's race, colour, sex,
language, religion, political or other opinion, national, ethnic
or social origin, property, disability, birth or other status.
2. States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to ensure
that the child is protected against all forms of discrimination
or punishment on the basis of the status, activities, expressed
opinions, or beliefs of the child's parents, legal guardians, or
1. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by
public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law,
administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best
interests of the child shall be a primary consideration.
2. States Parties undertake to ensure the child such protection
and care as is necessary for his or her well-being, taking into
account the rights and duties of his or her parents, legal
guardians, or other individuals legally responsible for him or
her, and, to this end, shall take all appropriate legislative and
3. States Parties shall ensure that the institutions, services
and facilities responsible for the care or protection of children
shall conform with the standards established by competent
authorities, particularly in the areas of safety, health, in the
number and suitability of their staff, as well as competent
States Parties shall undertake all appropriate legislative,
administrative, and other measures for the implementation of the
rights recognized in the present Convention. With regard to
economic, social and cultural rights, States Parties shall
undertake such measures to the maximum extent of their available
resources and, where needed, within the framework of
States Parties shall respect the responsibilities, rights and
duties of parents or, where applicable, the members of the
extended family or community as provided for by local custom,
legal guardians or other persons legally responsible for the
child, to provide, in a manner consistent with the evolving
capacities of the child, appropriate direction and guidance in
the exercise by the child of the rights recognized in the present
1. States Parties recognize that every child has the inherent
right to life.
2. States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the
survival and development of the child.
1. The child shall be registered immediately after birth and
shall have the right from birth to a name, the right to acquire a
nationality and. as far as possible, the right to know and be
cared for by his or her parents.
2. States Parties shall ensure the implementation of these rights
in accordance with their national law and their obligations under
the relevant international instruments in this field, in
particular where the child would otherwise be stateless.
1. States Parties undertake to respect the right of the child to
preserve his or her identity, including nationality, name and
family relations as recognized by law without unlawful
2. Where a child is illegally deprived of some or all of the
elements of his or her identity, States Parties shall provide
appropriate assistance and protection, with a view to
re-establishing speedily his or her identity.
1. States Parties shall ensure that a child shall not be
separated from his or her parents against their will, except when
competent authorities subject to judicial review determine, in
accordance with applicable law and procedures, that such
separation is necessary for the best interests of the child. Such
determination may be necessary in a particular case such as one
involving abuse or neglect of the child by the parents, or one
where the parents are living separately and a decision must be
made as to the child's place of residence.
2. In any proceedings pursuant to paragraph 1 of the present
article, all interested parties shall be given an opportunity to
participate in the proceedings and make their views known.
3. States Parties shall respect the right of the child who is
separated from one or both parents to maintain personal relations
and direct contact with both parents on a regular basis, except
if it is contrary to the child's best interests.
4. Where such separation results from any action initiated by a State Party,
such as the detention, imprisonment, exile, deportation or death
(including death arising from any cause while the person is in
the custody of the State) of one or both parents or of the child,
that State Party shall, upon request, provide the parents, the
child or, if appropriate, another member of the family with the
essential information concerning the whereabouts of the absent
member(s) of the family unless the provision of the information
would be detrimental to the well-being of the child. States
Parties shall further ensure that the submission of such a
request shall of itself entail no adverse consequences for the
1. In accordance with the obligation of States Parties under
article 9, paragraph 1, applications by a child or his or her
parents to enter or leave a State Party for the purpose of family
reunification shall be dealt with by States Parties in a
positive, humane and expeditious manner. States Parties shall
further ensure that the submission of such a request shall entail
no adverse consequences for the applicants and for the members of
2. A child whose parents reside in different States shall have
the right to maintain on a regular basis, save in exceptional
circumstances personal relations and direct contacts with both
parents. Towards that end and in accordance with the obligation
of States Parties under article 9, paragraph 1, States Parties
shall respect the right of the child and his or her parents to
leave any country, including their own, and to enter their own
country. The right to leave any country shall be subject only to
such restrictions as are prescribed by law and which are
necessary to protect the national security, public order (ordre
public), public health or morals or the rights and freedoms of
others and are consistent with the other rights recognized in the
1. States Parties shall take measures to combat the illicit
transfer and non-return of children abroad.
2. To this end, States Parties shall promote the conclusion of
bilateral or multilateral agreements or accession to existing
1. States Parties shall assure to the child who is capable of
forming his or her own views the right to express those views
freely in all matters affecting the child, the views of the child
being given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of
2. For this purpose, the child shall in particular be provided
the opportunity to be heard in any judicial and administrative
proceedings affecting the child, either directly, or through a
representative or an appropriate body, in a manner consistent
with the procedural rules of national law.
1. The child shall have the right to freedom of expression; this
right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers,
either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or
through any other media of the child's choice.
2. The exercise of this right may be subject to certain
restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law
and are necessary:
(a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others; or
(b) For the protection of national security or of public order
(ordre public), or of public health or morals.
1. States Parties shall respect the right of the child to freedom
of thought, conscience and religion.
2. States Parties shall respect the rights and duties of the
parents and, when applicable, legal guardians, to provide
direction to the child in the exercise of his or her right in a
manner consistent with the evolving capacities of the child.
3. Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject
only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are
necessary to protect public safety, order, health or morals, or
the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.
1. States Parties recognize the rights of the child to freedom of
association and to freedom of peaceful assembly.
2. No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of these rights
other than those imposed in conformity with the law and which are
necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national
security or public safety, public order (ordre public), the
protection of public health or morals or the protection of the
rights and freedoms of others.
1. No child shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful
interference with his or her privacy, family, home or
correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his or her honour and
2. The child has the right to the protection of the law against
such interference or attacks.
States Parties recognize the important function performed by the
mass media and shall ensure that the child has access to
information and material from a diversity of national and
international sources, especially those aimed at the promotion of
his or her social, spiritual and moral well-being and physical
and mental health. To this end, States Parties shall:
(a) Encourage the mass media to disseminate information and
material of social and cultural benefit to the child and in
accordance with the spirit of article 29;
(b) Encourage international co-operation in the production,
exchange and dissemination of such information and material from
a diversity of cultural, national and international sources;
(c) Encourage the production and dissemination of children's
(d) Encourage the mass media to have particular regard to the
linguistic needs of the child who belongs to a minority group or
who is indigenous;
(e) Encourage the development of appropriate guidelines for the
protection of the child from information and material injurious
to his or her well-being, bearing in mind the provisions of
articles 13 and 18.
1. States Parties shall use their best efforts to ensure
recognition of the principle that both parents have common
responsibilities for the upbringing and development of the child.
Parents or, as the case may be, legal guardians, have the primary
responsibility for the upbringing and development of the child.
The best interests of the child will be their basic concern.
2. For the purpose of guaranteeing and promoting the rights set
forth in the present Convention, States Parties shall render
appropriate assistance to parents and legal guardians in the
performance of their child-rearing responsibilities and shall
ensure the development of institutions, facilities and services
for the care of children.
3. States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to ensure
that children of working parents have the right to benefit from
child-care services and facilities for which they are eligible.
1. States Parties shall take all appropriate legislative,
administrative, social and educational measures to protect the
child from all forms of physical or mental violence, injury or
abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, maltreatment or
exploitation, including sexual abuse, while in the care of
parent(s), legal guardian(s) or any other person who has the care
of the child.
2. Such protective measures should, as appropriate, include
effective procedures for the establishment of social programmes
to provide necessary support for the child and for those who have
the care of the child, as well as for other forms of prevention
and for identification, reporting, referral, investigation,
treatment and follow-up of instances of child maltreatment
described heretofore, and, as appropriate, for judicial
1. A child temporarily or permanently deprived of his or her
family environment, or in whose own best interests cannot be
allowed to remain in that environment, shall be entitled to
special protection and assistance provided by the State.
2. States Parties shall in accordance with their national laws
ensure alternative care for such a child.
3. Such care could include, inter alia, foster placement, kafalah
of Islamic law, adoption or if necessary placement in suitable
institutions for the care of children. When considering
solutions, due regard shall be paid to the desirability of
continuity in a child's upbringing and to the child's ethnic,
religious, cultural and linguistic background.
States Parties that recognize and/or permit the system of
adoption shall ensure that the best interests of the child shall
be the paramount consideration and they shall:
(a) Ensure that the adoption of a child is authorized only by
competent authorities who determine, in accordance with
applicable law and procedures and on the basis of all pertinent
and reliable information, that the adoption is permissible in
view of the child's status concerning parents, relatives and
legal guardians and that, if required, the persons concerned have
given their informed consent to the adoption on the basis of such
counselling as may be necessary;
(b) Recognize that inter-country adoption may be considered as an
alternative means of child's care, if the child cannot be placed
in a foster or an adoptive family or cannot in any suitable
manner be cared for in the child's country of origin;
(c) Ensure that the child concerned by inter-country adoption enjoys
safeguards and standards equivalent to those existing in the case
of national adoption;
(d) Take all appropriate measures to ensure that, in
inter-country adoption, the placement does not result in improper
financial gain for those involved in it;
(e) Promote, where appropriate, the objectives of the present
article by concluding bilateral or multilateral arrangements or
agreements, and endeavour, within this framework, to ensure that
the placement of the child in another country is carried out by
competent authorities or organs.
1. States Parties shall take appropriate measures to ensure that
a child who is seeking refugee status or who is considered a
refugee in accordance with applicable international or domestic
law and procedures shall, whether unaccompanied or accompanied by
his or her parents or by any other person, receive appropriate
protection and humanitarian assistance in the enjoyment of
applicable rights set forth in the present Convention and in
other international human rights or humanitarian instruments to
which the said States are Parties.
2. For this purpose, States Parties shall provide, as they
consider appropriate, co-operation in any efforts by the United
Nations and other competent intergovernmental organizations or
non-governmental organizations co-operating with the United
Nations to protect and assist such a child and to trace the
parents or other members of the family of any refugee child in
order to obtain information necessary for reunification with his
or her family. In cases where no parents or other members of the
family can be found, the child shall be accorded the same
protection as any other child permanently or temporarily deprived
of his or her family environment for any reason , as set forth in
the present Convention.
1. States Parties recognize that a mentally or physically
disabled child should enjoy a full and decent life, in conditions
which ensure dignity, promote self-reliance and facilitate the
child's active participation in the community.
2. States Parties recognize the right of the disabled child to
special care and shall encourage and ensure the extension,
subject to available resources, to the eligible child and those
responsible for his or her care, of assistance for which
application is made and which is appropriate to the child's
condition and to the circumstances of the parents or others
caring for the child.
3. Recognizing the special needs of a disabled child, assistance
extended in accordance with paragraph 2 of the present article shall be
provided free of charge, whenever possible, taking into account the financial
resources of the parents or others caring for the child, and shall be designed
to ensure that the disabled child has effective access to and
receives education, training, health care services,
rehabilitation services, preparation for employment and
recreation opportunities in a manner conducive to the child's
achieving the fullest possible social integration and individual
development, including his or her cultural and spiritual
4. States Parties shall promote, in the spirit of international
cooperation, the exchange of appropriate information in the field
of preventive health care and of medical, psychological and
functional treatment of disabled children, including
dissemination of and access to information concerning methods of
rehabilitation, education and vocational services, with the aim
of enabling States Parties to improve their capabilities and
skills and to widen their experience in these areas. In this
regard, particular account shall be taken of the needs of
1. States Parties recognize the right of the child to the
enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health and to
facilities for the treatment of illness and rehabilitation of
health. States Parties shall strive to ensure that no child is
deprived of his or her right of access to such health care
2. States Parties shall pursue full implementation of this right
and, in particular, shall take appropriate measures:
(a) To diminish infant and child mortality;
(b) To ensure the provision of necessary medical assistance and
health care to all children with emphasis on the development of
primary health care;
(c) To combat disease and malnutrition, including within the
framework of primary health care, through, inter alia, the
application of readily available technology and through the
provision of adequate nutritious foods and clean drinking-water,
taking into consideration the dangers and risks of environmental
(d) To ensure appropriate pre-natal and post-natal health care
(e) To ensure that all segments of society, in particular parents
and children, are informed, have access to education and are
supported in the use of basic knowledge of child health and
nutrition, the advantages of breastfeeding, hygiene and
environmental sanitation and the prevention of accidents;
(f) To develop preventive health care, guidance for parents and
family planning education and services.
3. States Parties shall take all effective and appropriate
measures with a view to abolishing traditional practices
prejudicial to the health of children.
4. States Parties undertake to promote and encourage
international co-operation with a view to achieving progressively
the full realization of the right recognized in the present
article. In this regard, particular account shall be taken of the
needs of developing countries.
States Parties recognize the right of a child who has been placed
by the competent authorities for the purposes of care, protection
or treatment of his or her physical or mental health, to a
periodic review of the treatment provided to the child and all
other circumstances relevant to his or her placement.
1. States Parties shall recognize for every child the right to
benefit from social security, including social insurance, and
shall take the necessary measures to achieve the full realization
of this right in accordance with their national law.
2. The benefits should, where appropriate, be granted, taking
into account the resources and the circumstances of the child and
persons having responsibility for the maintenance of the child,
as well as any other consideration relevant to an application for
benefits made by or on behalf of the child.
1. States Parties recognize the right of every child to a
standard of living adequate for the child's physical, mental,
spiritual, moral and social development.
2. The parent(s) or others responsible for the child have the
primary responsibility to secure, within their abilities and
financial capacities, the conditions of living necessary for the
3. States Parties, in accordance with national conditions and
within their means, shall take appropriate measures to assist
parents and others responsible for the child to implement this
right and shall in case of need provide material assistance and
support programmes, particularly with regard to nutrition,
clothing and housing.
4. States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to secure
the recovery of maintenance for the child from the parents or
other persons having financial responsibility for the child, both
within the State Party and from abroad. In particular, where the
person having financial responsibility for the child lives in a
State different from that of the child, States Parties shall
promote the accession to international agreements or the
conclusion of such agreements, as well as the making of other
1. States Parties recognize the right of the child to education,
and with a view to achieving this right progressively and on the
basis of equal opportunity, they shall, in particular:
(a) Make primary education compulsory and available free to all;
(b) Encourage the development of different forms of secondary
education, including general and vocational education, make them
available and accessible to every child, and take appropriate
measures such as the introduction of free education and offering
financial assistance in case of need;
(c) Make higher education accessible to all on the basis of
capacity by every appropriate means;
(d) Make educational and vocational information and guidance
available and accessible to all children;
(e) Take measures to encourage regular attendance at schools and
the reduction of drop-out rates.
2. States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to ensure
that school discipline is administered in a manner consistent
with the child's human dignity and in conformity with the present
3. States Parties shall promote and encourage international
cooperation in matters relating to education, in particular with
a view to contributing to the elimination of ignorance and
illiteracy throughout the world and facilitating access to
scientific and technical knowledge and modern teaching methods.
In this regard, particular account shall be taken of the needs of
1. States Parties agree that the education of the child shall be
(a) The development of the child's personality, talents and
mental and physical abilities to their fullest potential;
(b) The development of respect for human rights and fundamental
freedoms, and for the principles enshrined in the Charter of the
(c) The development of respect for the child's parents, his or
her own cultural identity, language and values, for the national
values of the country in which the child is living, the country
from which he or she may originate, and for civilizations
different from his or her own;
(d) The preparation of the child for responsible life in a free
society, in the spirit of understanding, peace, tolerance,
equality of sexes, and friendship among all peoples, ethnic,
national and religious groups and persons of indigenous origin;
(e) The development of respect for the natural environment.
2. No part of the present article or article 28 shall be
construed so as to interfere with the liberty of individuals and
bodies to establish and direct educational institutions, subject
always to the observance of the principle set forth in paragraph
1 of the present article and to the requirements that the
education given in such institutions shall conform to such
minimum standards as may be laid down by the State.
In those States in which ethnic, religious or linguistic
minorities or persons of indigenous origin exist, a child
belonging to such a minority or who is indigenous shall not be
denied the right, in community with other members of his or her
group, to enjoy his or her own culture, to profess and practise
his or her own religion, or to use his or her own language.
1. States Parties recognize the right of the child to rest and
leisure, to engage in play and recreational activities
appropriate to the age of the child and to participate freely in
cultural life and the arts.
2. States Parties shall respect and promote the right of the
child to participate fully in cultural and artistic life and
shall encourage the provision of appropriate and equal
opportunities for cultural, artistic, recreational and leisure
1. States Parties recognize the right of the child to be
protected from economic exploitation and from performing any work
that is likely to be hazardous or to interfere with the child's
education, or to be harmful to the child's health or physical,
mental, spiritual, moral or social development.
2. States Parties shall take legislative, administrative, social
and educational measures to ensure the implementation of the
present article. To this end, and having regard to the relevant
provisions of other international instruments, States Parties
shall in particular:
(a) Provide for a minimum age or minimum
ages for admission to employment;
(b) Provide for appropriate regulation of the hours and
conditions of employment;
(c) Provide for appropriate penalties or other sanctions to
ensure the effective enforcement of the present article.
States Parties shall take all appropriate measures, including
legislative, administrative, social and educational measures, to
protect children from the illicit use of narcotic drugs and
psychotropic substances as defined in the relevant international
treaties, and to prevent the use of children in the illicit
production and trafficking of such substances.
States Parties undertake to protect the child from all forms of
sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. For these purposes, States
Parties shall in particular take all appropriate national,
bilateral and multilateral measures to prevent:
(a) The inducement or coercion of a child to engage in any
unlawful sexual activity;
(b) The exploitative use of children in prostitution or other
unlawful sexual practices;
(c) The exploitative use of children in pornographic performances
States Parties shall take all appropriate national, bilateral and
multilateral measures to prevent the abduction of, the sale of or
traffic in children for any purpose or in any form.
States Parties shall protect the child against all other forms of
exploitation prejudicial to any aspects of the child's welfare.
States Parties shall ensure that:
(a) No child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel,
inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Neither capital
punishment nor life imprisonment without possibility of release
shall be imposed for offences committed by persons below eighteen
years of age;
(b) No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully
or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child
shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a
measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of
(c) Every child deprived of liberty shall be treated with
humanity and respect for the inherent dignity of the human
person, and in a manner which takes into account the needs of
persons of his or her age. In particular, every child deprived of
liberty shall be separated from adults unless it is considered in
the child's best interest not to do so and shall have the right
to maintain contact with his or her family through correspondence
and visits, save in exceptional circumstances;
(d) Every child deprived of his or her liberty shall have the
right to prompt access to legal and other appropriate assistance,
as well as the right to challenge the legality of the deprivation
of his or her liberty before a court or other competent,
independent and impartial authority, and to a prompt decision on
any such action.
1. States Parties undertake to respect and to ensure respect for
rules of international humanitarian law applicable to them in
armed conflicts which are relevant to the child.
2. States Parties shall take all feasible measures to ensure that
persons who have not attained the age of fifteen years do not
take a direct part in hostilities.
3. States Parties shall refrain from recruiting any person who
has not attained the age of fifteen years into their armed
forces. In recruiting among those persons who have attained the
age of fifteen years but who have not attained the age of
eighteen years, States Parties shall endeavour to give priority
to those who are oldest.
4. In accordance with their obligations under international
humanitarian law to protect the civilian population in armed
conflicts, States Parties shall take all feasible measures to
ensure protection and care of children who are affected by an
States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to promote
physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a
child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse;
torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment; or armed conflicts. Such recovery and
reintegration shall take place in an environment which fosters
the health, self-respect and dignity of the child.
1. States Parties recognize the right of every child alleged as,
accused of, or recognized as having infringed the penal law to be
treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's
sense of dignity and worth, which reinforces the child's respect
for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others and which
takes into account the child's age and the desirability of
promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a
constructive role in society.
2. To this end, and having regard to the relevant provisions of
international instruments, States Parties shall, in particular,
(a) No child shall be alleged as, be accused of, or recognized as
having infringed the penal law by reason of acts or omissions
that were not prohibited by national or international law at the
time they were committed;
(b) Every child alleged as or accused of having infringed the
penal law has at least the following guarantees:
(i) To be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law;
(ii) To be informed promptly and directly of the charges against
him or her, and, if appropriate, through his or her parents or
legal guardians, and to have legal or other appropriate
assistance in the preparation and presentation of his or her
(iii) To have the matter determined without delay by a competent,
independent and impartial authority or judicial body in a fair
hearing according to law, in the presence of legal or other
appropriate assistance and, unless it is considered not to be in
the best interest of the child, in particular, taking into
account his or her age or situation, his or her parents or legal
(iv) Not to be compelled to give testimony or to confess guilt;
to examine or have examined adverse witnesses and to obtain the
participation and examination of witnesses on his or her behalf
under conditions of equality;
(v) If considered to have infringed the penal law, to have this
decision and any measures imposed in consequence thereof reviewed
by a higher competent, independent and impartial authority or
judicial body according to law;
(vi) To have the free assistance of an interpreter if the child
cannot understand or speak the language used;
(vii) To have his or her privacy fully respected at all stages of
3. States Parties shall seek to promote the establishment of
laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically
applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or
recognized as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular:
(a) The establishment of a minimum age below which children shall
be presumed not to have the capacity to infringe the penal law;
(b) Whenever appropriate and desirable, measures for dealing with
such children without resorting to judicial proceedings,
providing that human rights and legal safeguards are fully
4. A variety of dispositions, such as care, guidance and
supervision orders; counselling; probation; foster care;
education and vocational training programmes and other
alternatives to institutional care shall be available to ensure
that children are dealt with in a manner appropriate to their
well-being and proportionate both to their circumstances and the
Nothing in the present Convention shall affect any provisions
which are more conducive to the realization of the rights of the
child and which may be contained in:
(a) The law of a State party; or
(b) International law in force for that State.
States Parties undertake to make the principles and provisions of
the Convention widely known, by appropriate and active means, to
adults and children alike.
1. For the purpose of examining the progress made by States
Parties in achieving the realization of the obligations
undertaken in the present Convention, there shall be established
a Committee on the Rights of the Child, which shall carry out the
functions hereinafter provided.
2. The Committee shall consist of ten experts of high moral
standing and recognized competence in the field covered by this
Convention. The members of the Committee shall be elected by
States Parties from among their nationals and shall serve in
their personal capacity, consideration being given to equitable
geographical distribution, as well as to the principal legal
3. The members of the Committee shall be elected by secret ballot
from a list of persons nominated by States Parties. Each State
Party may nominate one person from among its own nationals.
4. The initial election to the Committee shall be held no later
than six months after the date of the entry into force of the
present Convention and thereafter every second year. At least
four months before the date of each election, the
Secretary-General of the United Nations shall address a letter to
States Parties inviting them to submit their nominations within
two months. The Secretary-General shall subsequently prepare a
list in alphabetical order of all persons thus nominated,
indicating States Parties which have nominated them, and shall
submit it to the States Parties to the present Convention.
5. The elections shall be held at meetings of States Parties
convened by the Secretary-General at United Nations Headquarters.
At those meetings, for which two thirds of States Parties shall
constitute a quorum, the persons elected to the Committee shall
be those who obtain the largest number of votes and an absolute
majority of the votes of the representatives of States Parties
present and voting.
6. The members of the Committee shall be elected for a term of
four years. They shall be eligible for re-election if
renominated. The term of five of the members elected at the first
election shall expire at the end of two years; immediately after
the first election, the names of these five members shall be
chosen by lot by the Chairman of the meeting.
7. If a member of the Committee dies or resigns or declares that
for any other cause he or she can no longer perform the duties of
the Committee, the State Party which nominated the member shall
appoint another expert from among its nationals to serve for the
remainder of the term, subject to the approval of the Committee.
8. The Committee shall establish its own rules of procedure.
9. The Committee shall elect its officers for a period of two
10. The meetings of the Committee shall normally be held at
United Nations Headquarters or at any other convenient place as
determined by the Committee. The Committee shall normally meet
annually. The duration of the meetings of the Committee shall be
determined, and reviewed, if necessary, by a meeting of the
States Parties to the present Convention, subject to the approval
of the General Assembly.
11. The Secretary-General of the United Nations shall provide the
necessary staff and facilities for the effective performance of
the functions of the Committee under the present Convention.
12. With the approval of the General Assembly, the members of the
Committee established under the present Convention shall receive
emoluments from United Nations resources on such terms and
conditions as the Assembly may decide.
1. States Parties undertake to submit to the Committee, through
the Secretary-General of the United Nations, reports on the
measures they have adopted which give effect to the rights
recognized herein and on the progress made on the enjoyment of
(a) Within two years of the entry into force of the Convention
for the State Party concerned;
(b) Thereafter every five years.
2. Reports made under the present article shall indicate factors
and difficulties, if any, affecting the degree of fulfilment of
the obligations under the present Convention. Reports shall also
contain sufficient information to provide the Committee with a
comprehensive understanding of the implementation of the
Convention in the country concerned.
3. A State Party which has submitted a comprehensive initial
report to the Committee need not, in its subsequent reports
submitted in accordance with paragraph 1 (b) of the present
article, repeat basic information previously provided.
4. The Committee may request from States Parties further
information relevant to the implementation of the Convention.
5. The Committee shall submit to the General Assembly, through
the Economic and Social Council, every two years, reports on its
6. States Parties shall make their reports widely available to
the public in their own countries.
In order to foster the effective implementation of the Convention
and to encourage international co-operation in the field covered
by the Convention:
(a) The specialized agencies, the United Nations Children's Fund,
and other United Nations organs shall be entitled to be
represented at the consideration of the implementation of such
provisions of the present Convention as fall within the scope of
their mandate. The Committee may invite the specialized agencies,
the United Nations Children's Fund and other competent bodies as
it may consider appropriate to provide expert advice on the
implementation of the Convention in areas falling within the
scope of their respective mandates. The Committee may invite the
specialized agencies, the United Nations Children's Fund, and
other United Nations organs to submit reports on the
implementation of the Convention in areas falling within the
scope of their activities;
(b) The Committee shall transmit, as it may consider appropriate,
to the specialized agencies, the United Nations Children's Fund
and other competent bodies, any reports from States Parties that
contain a request, or indicate a need, for technical advice or
assistance, along with the Committee's observations and
suggestions, if any, on these requests or indications;
(c) The Committee may recommend to the General Assembly to
request the Secretary-General to undertake on its behalf studies
on specific issues relating to the rights of the child;
(d) The Committee may make suggestions and general
recommendations based on information received pursuant to
articles 44 and 45 of the present Convention. Such suggestions
and general recommendations shall be transmitted to any State
Party concerned and reported to the General Assembly, together
with comments, if any, from States Parties.
The present Convention shall be open for signature by all States.
The present Convention is subject to ratification. Instruments of
ratification shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the
The present Convention shall remain open for accession by any
State. The instruments of accession shall be deposited with the
Secretary-General of the United Nations.
1. The present Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth
day following the date of deposit with the Secretary-General of
the United Nations of the twentieth instrument of ratification or
2. For each State ratifying or acceding to the Convention after
the deposit of the twentieth instrument of ratification or
accession, the Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth
day after the deposit by such State of its instrument of
ratification or accession.
1. Any State Party may propose an amendment and file it with the
Secretary-General of the United Nations. The Secretary-General
shall thereupon communicate the proposed amendment to States
Parties, with a request that they indicate whether they favour a
conference of States Parties for the purpose of considering and
voting upon the proposals. In the event that, within four months
from the date of such communication, at least one third of the
States Parties favour such a conference, the Secretary-General
shall convene the conference under the auspices of the United
Nations. Any amendment adopted by a majority of States Parties
present and voting at the conference shall be submitted to the
General Assembly for approval.
2. An amendment adopted in accordance with paragraph 1 of the
present article shall enter into force when it has been approved
by the General Assembly of the United Nations and accepted by a
two-thirds majority of States Parties.
3. When an amendment enters into force, it shall be binding on
those States Parties which have accepted it, other States Parties
still being bound by the provisions of the present Convention and
any earlier amendments which they have accepted.
1. The Secretary-General of the United Nations shall receive and
circulate to all States the text of reservations made by States
at the time of ratification or accession.
2. A reservation incompatible with the object and purpose of the
present Convention shall not be permitted.
3. Reservations may be withdrawn at any time by notification to
that effect addressed to the Secretary-General of the United
Nations, who shall then inform all States. Such notification
shall take effect on the date on which it is received by the
A State Party may denounce the present Convention by written
notification to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
Denunciation becomes effective one year after the date of receipt
of the notification by the Secretary-General.
The Secretary-General of the United Nations is designated as the
depositary of the present Convention. Article 54
The original of the present Convention, of which the Arabic,
Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish texts are equally
authentic, shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the
IN WITNESS THEREOF the undersigned plenipotentiaries, being duly
authorized thereto by their respective governments, have signed
the present Convention.
United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty,
45/113, annex, 45 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 49A) at 205, U.N. Doc. A/45/49 (1990).
I. FUNDAMENTAL PERSPECTIVES
1. The juvenile justice system should uphold the rights and
safety and promote the physical and mental well-being of
juveniles. Imprisonment should be used as a last resort.
2. Juveniles should only be deprived of their liberty in
accordance with the principles and procedures set forth in these
Rules and in the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the
Administration of Juvenile Justice (The Beijing Rules).
Deprivation of the liberty of a juvenile should be a disposition
of last resort and for the minimum necessary period and should be
limited to exceptional cases. The length of the sanction should
be determined by the judicial authority, without precluding the
possibility of his or her early release.
3. The Rules are intended to establish minimum standards accepted
by the United Nations for the protection of juveniles deprived of
their liberty in all forms, consistent with human rights and
fundamental freedoms, and with a view to counteracting the
detrimental effects of all types of detention and to fostering
integration in society.
4. The Rules should be applied impartially, without
discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, age,
language, religion, nationality, political or other opinion,
cultural beliefs or practices, property, birth or family status,
ethnic or social origin, and disability. The religious and
cultural beliefs, practices and moral concepts of the juvenile
should be respected.
5. The Rules are designed to serve as convenient standards of
reference and to provide encouragement and guidance to
professionals involved in the management of the juvenile justice
6. The Rules should be made readily available to juvenile justice
personnel in their national languages. Juveniles who are not
fluent in the language spoken by the personnel of the detention
facility should have the right to the services of an interpreter free
of charge whenever necessary, in particular during medical
examinations and disciplinary proceedings.
7. Where appropriate, States should incorporate the Rules into
their legislation or amend it accordingly and provide effective
remedies for their breach, including compensation when injuries
are inflicted on juveniles. States should also monitor the
application of the Rules.
8. The competent authorities should constantly seek to increase
the awareness of the public that the care of detained juveniles
and preparation for their return to society is a social service
of great importance, and to this end active steps should be taken
to foster open contacts between the juveniles and the local
9. Nothing in the Rules should be interpreted as precluding the
application of the relevant United Nations and human rights
instruments and standards, recognized by the international
community, that are more conducive to ensuring the rights, care
and protection of juveniles, children and all young persons.
10. In the event that the practical application of particular
Rules contained in sections II to V, inclusive, presents any
conflict with the Rules contained in the present section,
compliance with the latter shall be regarded as the predominant
II. SCOPE AND APPLICATION OF THE RULES
11. For the purposes of the Rules, the following definitions
(a) A juvenile is every person under the age of 18. The age limit
below which it should not be permitted to deprive a child of his
or her liberty should be determined by law;
(b) The deprivation of liberty means any form of detention or
imprisonment or the placement of a person in a public or private
custodial setting, from which this person is not permitted to
leave at will, by order of any judicial, administrative or other
12. The deprivation of liberty should be effected in conditions
and circumstances which ensure respect for the human rights of
juveniles. Juveniles detained in facilities should be guaranteed
the benefit of meaningful activities and programmes which would
serve to promote and sustain their health and self-respect, to
foster their sense of responsibility and encourage those
attitudes and skills that will assist them in developing their
potential as members of society.
13. Juveniles deprived of their liberty shall not for any reason
related to their status be denied the civil, economic, political,
social or cultural rights to which they are entitled under
national or international law, and which are compatible with the
deprivation of liberty.
14. The protection of the individual rights of juveniles with
special regard to the legality of the execution of the detention
measures shall be ensured by the competent authority, while the
objectives of social integration should be secured by regular
inspections and other means of control carried out, according to
international standards, national laws and regulations, by a duly
constituted body authorized to visit the juveniles and not
belonging to the detention facility.
15. The Rules apply to all types and forms of detention
facilities in which juveniles are deprived of their liberty.
Sections I, II, IV and V of the Rules apply to all detention
facilities and institutional settings in which juveniles are
detained, and section III applies specifically to juveniles under
arrest or awaiting trial.
16. The Rules shall be implemented in the context of the
economic, social and cultural conditions prevailing in each
III. JUVENILES UNDER ARREST OR AWAITING TRIAL
17. Juveniles who are detained under arrest or awaiting trial
("untried'') are presumed innocent and shall be treated as such.
Detention before trial shall be avoided to the extent possible
and limited to exceptional circumstances. Therefore, all efforts
shall be made to apply alternative measures. When preventive
detention is nevertheless used, juvenile courts and investigative
bodies shall give the highest priority to the most expeditious
processing of such cases to ensure the shortest possible duration
of detention. Untried detainees should be separated from
18. The conditions under which an untried juvenile is detained
should be consistent with the rules set out below, with
additional specific provisions as are necessary and appropriate,
given the requirements of the presumption of innocence, the
duration of the detention and the legal status and circumstances
of the juvenile. These provisions would include, but not
necessarily be restricted to, the following:
(a) Juveniles should have the right of legal counsel and be
enabled to apply for free legal aid, where such aid is available,
and to communicate regularly with their legal advisers. Privacy
and confidentiality shall be ensured for such communications;
(b) Juveniles should be provided, where possible, with
opportunities to pursue work, with remuneration, and continue
education or training, but should not be required to do so. Work,
education or training should not cause the continuation of the
(c) Juveniles should receive and retain materials for their
leisure and recreation as are compatible with the interests of
the administration of justice.
IV. THE MANAGEMENT OF JUVENILE FACILITIES
19. All reports, including legal records, medical records and
records of disciplinary proceedings, and all other documents
relating to the form, content and details of treatment, should be
placed in a confidential individual file, which should be kept up
to date, accessible only to authorized persons and classified in
such a way as to be easily understood. Where possible, every
juvenile should have the right to contest any fact or opinion
contained in his or her file so as to permit rectification of
inaccurate, unfounded or unfair statements. In order to exercise
this right, there should be procedures that allow an appropriate
third party to have access to and to consult the file on request.
Upon release, the records of juveniles shall be sealed, and, at
an appropriate time, expunged.
20. No juvenile should be received in any detention facility
without a valid commitment order of a judicial, administrative or
other public authority. The details of this order should be
immediately entered in the register. No juvenile should be
detained in any facility where there is no such register.
B. Admission, registration, movement and transfer
21. In every place where juveniles are detained, a complete and
secure record of the following information should be kept
concerning each juvenile received:
(a) Information on the identity of the juvenile;
(b) The fact of and reasons for commitment and the authority
(c) The day and hour of admission, transfer and release;
(d) Details of the notifications to parents and guardians on
every admission, transfer or release of the juvenile in their
care at the time of commitment;
(e) Details of known physical and mental health problems,
including drug and alcohol abuse.
22. The information on admission, place, transfer and release
should be provided without delay to the parents and guardians or
closest relative of the juvenile concerned.
23. As soon as possible after reception, full reports and
relevant information on the personal situation and circumstances
of each juvenile should be drawn up and submitted to the
24. On admission, all juveniles shall be given a copy of the
rules governing the detention facility and a written description
of their rights and obligations in a language they can
understand, together with the address of the authorities
competent to receive complaints, as well as the address of public
or private agencies and organizations which provide legal
assistance. For those juveniles who are illiterate or who cannot
understand the language in the written form, the information
should be conveyed in a manner enabling full comprehension.
25. All juveniles should be helped to understand the regulations
governing the internal organization of the facility, the goals
and methodology of the care provided, the disciplinary
requirements and procedures, other authorized methods of seeking
information and of making complaints and all such other matters
as are necessary to enable them to understand fully their rights
and obligations during detention.
26. The transport of juveniles should be carried out at the
expense of the administration in conveyances with adequate
ventilation and light, in conditions that should in no way
subject them to hardship or indignity. Juveniles should not be
transferred from one facility to another arbitrarily.
C. Classification and placement
27. As soon as possible after the moment of admission, each
juvenile should be interviewed, and a psychological and social
report identifying any factors relevant to the specific type and
level of care and programme required by the juvenile should be
prepared. This report, together with the report prepared by a
medical officer who has examined the juvenile upon admission,
should be forwarded to the director for purposes of determining
the most appropriate placement for the juvenile within the
facility and the specific type and level of care and programme
required and to be pursued. When special rehabilitative treatment
is required, and the length of stay in the facility permits,
trained personnel of the facility should prepare a written,
individualized treatment plan specifying treatment objectives and
time-frame and the means, stages and delays with which the
objectives should be approached.
28. The detention of juveniles should only take place under
conditions that take full account of their particular needs,
status and special requirements according to their age,
personality, sex and type of offence, as well as mental and
physical health, and which ensure their protection from harmful
influences and risk situations. The principal criterion for the
separation of different categories of juveniles deprived of their
liberty should be the provision of the type of care best suited
to the particular needs of the individuals concerned and the
protection of their physical, mental and moral integrity and
29. In all detention facilities juveniles should be separated
from adults, unless they are members of the same family. Under
controlled conditions, juveniles may be brought together with
carefully selected adults as part of a special programme that has
been shown to be beneficial for the juveniles concerned.
30. Open detention facilities for juveniles should be
established. Open detention facilities are those with no or
minimal security measures. The population in such detention
facilities should be as small as possible. The number of
juveniles detained in closed facilities should be small enough to
enable individualized treatment. Detention facilities for
juveniles should be decentralized and of such size as to
facilitate access and contact between the juveniles and their
families. Small-scale detention facilities should be established
and integrated into the social, economic and cultural environment
of the community.
D. Physical environment and accommodation
31. Juveniles deprived of their liberty have the right to
facilities and services that meet all the requirements of health
and human dignity.
32. The design of detention facilities for juveniles and the
physical environment should be in keeping with the rehabilitative
aim of residential treatment, with due regard to the need of the
juvenile for privacy, sensory stimuli, opportunities for
association with peers and participation in sports, physical
exercise and leisure-time activities. The design and structure of
juvenile detention facilities should be such as to minimize the
risk of fire and to ensure safe evacuation from the premises.
There should be an effective alarm system in case of fire, as
well as formal and drilled procedures to ensure the safety of the
juveniles. Detention facilities should not be located in areas
where there are known health or other hazards or risks.
33. Sleeping accommodation should normally consist of small group
dormitories or individual bedrooms, while bearing in mind local
standards. During sleeping hours there should be regular,
unobtrusive supervision of all sleeping areas, including
individual rooms and group dormitories, in order to ensure the
protection of each juvenile. Every juvenile should, in accordance
with local or national standards, be provided with separate and
sufficient bedding, which should be clean when issued, kept in
good order and changed often enough to ensure cleanliness.
34. Sanitary installations should be so located and of a
sufficient standard to enable every juvenile to comply, as
required, with their physical needs in privacy and in a clean and
35. The possession of personal effects is a basic element of the
right to privacy and essential to the psychological well-being of
the juvenile. The right of every juvenile to possess personal
effects and to have adequate storage facilities for them should
be fully recognized and respected. Personal effects that the
juvenile does not choose to retain or that are confiscated should
be placed in safe custody. An inventory thereof should be signed
by the juvenile. Steps should be taken to keep them in good
condition. All such articles and money should be returned to the
juvenile on release, except in so far as he or she has been
authorized to spend money or send such property out of the
facility. If a juvenile receives or is found in possession of any
medicine, the medical officer should decide what use should be
made of it.
36. To the extent possible juveniles should have the right to use
their own clothing. Detention facilities should ensure that each
juvenile has personal clothing suitable for the climate and
adequate to ensure good health, and which should in no manner be
degrading or humiliating. Juveniles removed from or leaving a
facility for any purpose should be allowed to wear their own
37. Every detention facility shall ensure that every juvenile
receives food that is suitably prepared and presented at normal
meal times and of a quality and quantity to satisfy the standards
of dietetics, hygiene and health and, as far as possible,
religious and cultural requirements. Clean drinking water should
be available to every juvenile at any time.
E. Education, vocational training and work
38. Every juvenile of compulsory school age has the right to
education suited to his or her needs and abilities and designed
to prepare him or her for return to society. Such education
should be provided outside the detention facility in community
schools wherever possible and, in any case, by qualified teachers
through programmes integrated with the education system of the
country so that, after release, juveniles may continue their
education without difficulty. Special attention should be given
by the administration of the detention facilities to the
education of juveniles of foreign origin or with particular
cultural or ethnic needs. Juveniles who are illiterate or have
cognitive or learning difficulties should have the right to
39. Juveniles above compulsory school age who wish to continue
their education should be permitted and encouraged to do so, and
every effort should be made to provide them with access to
appropriate educational programmes.
40. Diplomas or educational certificates awarded to juveniles
while in detention should not indicate in any way that the
juvenile has been institutionalized.
41. Every detention facility should provide access to a library
that is adequately stocked with both instructional and
recreational books and periodicals suitable for the juveniles,
who should be encouraged and enabled to make full use of it.
42. Every juvenile should have the right to receive vocational
training in occupations likely to prepare him or her for future
43. With due regard to proper vocational selection and to the
requirements of institutional administration, juveniles should be
able to choose the type of work they wish to perform.
44. All protective national and international standards
applicable to child labour and young workers should apply to
juveniles deprived of their liberty.
45. Wherever possible, juveniles should be provided with the
opportunity to perform remunerated labour, if possible within the
local community, as a complement to the vocational training
provided in order to enhance the possibility of finding suitable
employment when they return to their communities. The type of
work should be such as to provide appropriate training that will
be of benefit to the juveniles following release. The
organization and methods of work offered in detention facilities
should resemble as closely as possible those of similar work in
the community, so as to prepare juveniles for the conditions of
normal occupational life.
46. Every juvenile who performs work should have the right to an
equitable remuneration. The interests of the juveniles and of
their vocational training should not be subordinated to the
purpose of making a profit for the detention facility or a third
party. Part of the earnings of a juvenile should normally be set
aside to constitute a savings fund to be handed over to the
juvenile on release. The juvenile should have the right to use
the remainder of those earnings to purchase articles for his or
her own use or to indemnify the victim injured by his or her
offence or to send it to his or her family or other persons
outside the detention facility.
47. Every juvenile should have the right to a suitable amount of
time for daily free exercise, in the open air whenever weather
permits, during which time appropriate recreational and physical
training should normally be provided. Adequate space,
installations and equipment should be provided for these
activities. Every juvenile should have additional time for daily
leisure activities, part of which should be devoted, if the
juvenile so wishes, to arts and crafts skill development. The
detention facility should ensure that each juvenile is physically
able to participate in the available programmes of physical
education. Remedial physical education and therapy should be
offered, under medical supervision, to juveniles needing it.
48. Every juvenile should be allowed to satisfy the needs of his
or her religious and spiritual life, in particular by attending
the services or meetings provided in the detention facility or by
conducting his or her own services and having possession of the
necessary books or items of religious observance and instruction
of his or her denomination. If a detention facility contains a
sufficient number of juveniles of a given religion, one or more
qualified representatives of that religion should be appointed or
approved and allowed to hold regular services and to pay pastoral
visits in private to juveniles at their request. Every juvenile
should have the right to receive visits from a qualified
representative of any religion of his or her choice, as well as
the right not to participate in religious services and freely to
decline religious education, counselling or indoctrination.
H. Medical care
49. Every juvenile shall receive adequate medical care, both
preventive and remedial, including dental, ophthalmological and
mental health care, as well as pharmaceutical products and
special diets as medically indicated. All such medical care
should, where possible, be provided to detained juveniles through
the appropriate health facilities and services of the community
in which the detention facility is located, in order to prevent
stigmatization of the juvenile and promote self-respect and
integration into the community.
50. Every juvenile has a right to be examined by a physician
immediately upon admission to a detention facility, for the
purpose of recording any evidence of prior ill-treatment and
identifying any physical or mental condition requiring medical
51. The medical services provided to juveniles should seek to
detect and should treat any physical or mental illness, substance
abuse or other condition that may hinder the integration of the
juvenile into society. Every detention facility for juveniles
should have immediate access to adequate medical facilities and
equipment appropriate to the number and requirements of its
residents and staff trained in preventive health care and the
handling of medical emergencies. Every juvenile who is ill, who
complains of illness or who demonstrates symptoms of physical or
mental difficulties, should be examined promptly by a medical
52. Any medical officer who has reason to believe that the
physical or mental health of a juvenile has been or will be
injuriously affected by continued detention, a hunger strike or
any condition of detention should report this fact immediately to
the director of the detention facility in question and to the
independent authority responsible for safeguarding the well-being
of the juvenile.
53. A juvenile who is suffering from mental illness should be
treated in a specialized institution under independent medical
management. Steps should be taken, by arrangement with
appropriate agencies, to ensure any necessary continuation of
mental health care after release.
54. Juvenile detention facilities should adopt specialized drug
abuse prevention and rehabilitation programmes administered by
qualified personnel. These programmes should be adapted to the
age, sex and other requirements of the juveniles concerned, and
detoxification facilities and services staffed by trained
personnel should be available to drug- or alcohol-dependent
55. Medicines should be administered only for necessary treatment
on medical grounds and, when possible, after having obtained the
informed consent of the juvenile concerned. In particular, they
must not be administered with a view to eliciting information or
a confession, as a punishment or as a means of restraint.
Juveniles shall never be testers in the experimental use of drugs
and treatment. The administration of any drug should always be
authorized and carried out by qualified medical personnel.
I. Notification of illness, injury and death
56. The family or guardian of a juvenile and any other person
designated by the juvenile have the right to be informed of the
state of health of the juvenile on request and in the event of
any important changes in the health of the juvenile. The director
of the detention facility should notify immediately the family or
guardian of the juvenile concerned, or other designated person,
in case of death, illness requiring transfer of the juvenile to
an outside medical facility, or a condition requiring clinical
care within the detention facility for more than 48 hours.
Notification should also be given to the consular authorities of
the State of which a foreign juvenile is a citizen.
57. Upon the death of a juvenile during the period of deprivation
of liberty, the nearest relative should have the right to inspect
the death certificate, see the body and determine the method of
disposal of the body. Upon the death of a juvenile in detention,
there should be an independent inquiry into the causes of death,
the report of which should be made accessible to the nearest
relative. This inquiry should also be made when the death of a
juvenile occurs within six months from the date of his or her
release from the detention facility and there is reason to
believe that the death is related to the period of detention.
58. A juvenile should be informed at the earliest possible time
of the death, serious illness or injury of any immediate family
member and should be provided with the opportunity to attend the
funeral of the deceased or go to the bedside of a critically ill
J. Contacts with the wider community
59. Every means should be provided to ensure that juveniles have
adequate communication with the outside world, which is an
integral part of the right to fair and humane treatment and is
essential to the preparation of juveniles for their return to
society. Juveniles should be allowed to communicate with their
families, friends and other persons or representatives of
reputable outside organizations, to leave detention facilities
for a visit to their home and family and to receive special
permission to leave the detention facility for educational,
vocational or other important reasons. Should the juvenile be
serving a sentence, the time spent outside a detention facility
should be counted as part of the period of sentence.
60. Every juvenile should have the right to receive regular and
frequent visits, in principle once a week and not less than once
a month, in circumstances that respect the need of the juvenile
for privacy, contact and unrestricted communication with the
family and the defence counsel.
61. Every juvenile should have the right to communicate in
writing or by telephone at least twice a week with the person of
his or her choice, unless legally restricted, and should be
assisted as necessary in order effectively to enjoy this right.
Every juvenile should have the right to receive correspondence.
62. Juveniles should have the opportunity to keep themselves
informed regularly of the news by reading newspapers, periodicals
and other publications, through access to radio and television
programmes and motion pictures, and through the visits of the
representatives of any lawful club or organization in which the
juvenile is interested.
K. Limitations of physical restraint and the use of force
63. Recourse to instruments of restraint and to force for any
purpose should be prohibited, except as set forth in rule 64
64. Instruments of restraint and force can only be used in
exceptional cases, where all other control methods have been
exhausted and failed, and only as explicitly authorized and
specified by law and regulation. They should not cause
humiliation or degradation, and should be used restrictively and
only for the shortest possible period of time. By order of the
director of the administration, such instruments might be
resorted to in order to prevent the juvenile from inflicting
self-injury, injuries to others or serious destruction of
property. In such instances, the director should at once consult
medical and other relevant personnel and report to the higher
65. The carrying and use of weapons by personnel should be
prohibited in any facility where juveniles are detained.
L. Disciplinary procedures
66. Any disciplinary measures and procedures should maintain the
interest of safety and an ordered community life and should be
consistent with the upholding of the inherent dignity of the
juvenile and the fundamental objective of institutional care,
namely, instilling a sense of justice, self-respect and respect
for the basic rights of every person.
67. All disciplinary measures constituting cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment shall be strictly prohibited, including
corporal punishment, placement in a dark cell, closed or solitary
confinement or any other punishment that may compromise the
physical or mental health of the juvenile concerned. The
reduction of diet and the restriction or denial of contact with
family members should be prohibited for any purpose. Labour
should always be viewed as an educational tool and a means of
promoting the self-respect of the juvenile in preparing him or
her for return to the community and should not be imposed as a
disciplinary sanction. No juvenile should be sanctioned more than
once for the same disciplinary infraction. Collective sanctions
should be prohibited.
68. Legislation or regulations adopted by the competent
administrative authority should establish norms concerning the
following, taking full account of the fundamental
characteristics, needs and rights of juveniles:
(a) Conduct constituting a disciplinary offence;
(b) Type and duration of disciplinary sanctions that may be
(c) The authority competent to impose such sanctions;
(d) The authority competent to consider appeals.
69. A report of misconduct should be presented promptly to the
competent authority, which should decide on it without undue
delay. The competent authority should conduct a thorough
examination of the case.
70. No juvenile should be disciplinarily sanctioned except in
strict accordance with the terms of the law and regulations in
force. No juvenile should be sanctioned unless he or she has been
informed of the alleged infraction in a manner appropriate to the
full understanding of the juvenile, and given a proper
opportunity of presenting his or her defence, including the right
of appeal to a competent impartial authority. Complete records
should be kept of all disciplinary proceedings.
71. No juveniles should be responsible for disciplinary functions
except in the supervision of specified social, educational or
sports activities or in self-government programmes.
M. Inspection and complaints
72. Qualified inspectors or an equivalent duly constituted
authority not belonging to the administration of the facility
should be empowered to conduct inspections on a regular basis and
to undertake unannounced inspections on their own initiative, and
should enjoy full guarantees of independence in the exercise of
this function. Inspectors should have unrestricted access to all
persons employed by or working in any facility where juveniles
are or may be deprived of their liberty, to all juveniles and to
all records of such facilities.
73. Qualified medical officers attached to the inspecting
authority or the public health service should participate in the
inspections, evaluating compliance with the rules concerning the
physical environment, hygiene, accommodation, food, exercise and
medical services, as well as any other aspect or conditions of
institutional life that affect the physical and mental health of
juveniles. Every juvenile should have the right to talk in
confidence to any inspecting officer.
74. After completing the inspection, the inspector should be
required to submit a report on the findings. The report should
include an evaluation of the compliance of the detention
facilities with the present rules and relevant provisions of
national law, and recommendations regarding any steps considered
necessary to ensure compliance with them. Any facts discovered by
an inspector that appear to indicate that a violation of legal
provisions concerning the rights of juveniles or the operation of
a juvenile detention facility has occurred should be communicated
to the competent authorities for investigation and prosecution.
75. Every juvenile should have the opportunity of making requests
or complaints to the director of the detention facility and to
his or her authorized representative.
76. Every juvenile should have the right to make a request or
complaint, without censorship as to substance, to the central
administration, the judicial authority or other proper
authorities through approved channels, and to be informed of the
response without delay.
77. Efforts should be made to establish an independent office
(ombudsman) to receive and investigate complaints made by
juveniles deprived of their liberty and to assist in the
achievement of equitable settlements.
78. Every juvenile should have the right to request assistance
from family members, legal counsellors, humanitarian groups or
others where possible, in order to make a complaint. Illiterate
juveniles should be provided with assistance should they need to
use the services of public or private agencies and organizations
which provide legal counsel or which are competent to receive
N. Return to the community
79. All juveniles should benefit from arrangements designed to
assist them in returning to society, family life, education or
employment after release. Procedures, including early release,
and special courses should be devised to this end.
80. Competent authorities should provide or ensure services to
assist juveniles in re-establishing themselves in society and to
lessen prejudice against such juveniles. These services should
ensure', to the extent possible, that the juvenile is provided
with suitable residence, employment, clothing, and sufficient
means to maintain himself or herself upon release in order to
facilitate successful reintegration. The representatives of
agencies providing such services should be consulted and should
have access to juveniles while detained, with a view to assisting
them in their return to the community.
81. Personnel should be qualified and include a sufficient number
of specialists such as educators, vocational instructors,
counsellors, social workers, psychiatrists and psychologists.
These and other specialist staff should normally be employed on a
permanent basis. This should not preclude part-time or volunteer
workers when the level of support and training they can provide
is appropriate and beneficial. Detention facilities should make
use of all remedial, educational, moral, spiritual, and other
resources and forms of assistance that are appropriate and
available in the community, according to the individual needs and
problems of detained juveniles.
82. The administration should provide for the careful selection
and recruitment of every grade and type of personnel, since the
proper management of detention facilities depends on their
integrity, humanity, ability and professional capacity to deal
with juveniles, as well as personal suitability for the work.
83. To secure the foregoing ends, personnel should be appointed
as professional officers with adequate remuneration to attract
and retain suitable women and men. The personnel of juvenile
detention facilities should be continually encouraged to fulfil
their duties and obligations in a humane, committed,
professional, fair and efficient manner, to conduct themselves at
all times in such a way as to deserve and gain the respect of the
juveniles, and to provide juveniles with a positive role model
84. The administration should introduce forms of organization and
management that facilitate communications between different
categories of staff in each detention facility so as to enhance
cooperation between the various services engaged in the care of
juveniles, as well as between staff and the administration, with
a view to ensuring that staff directly in contact with juveniles
are able to function in conditions favourable to the efficient
fulfilment of their duties.
85. The personnel should receive such training as will enable
them to carry out their responsibilities effectively, in
particular training in child psychology, child welfare and
international standards and norms of human rights and the rights
of the child, including the present Rules. The personnel should
maintain and improve their knowledge and professional capacity by
attending courses of in-service training, to be organized at
suitable intervals throughout their career.
86. The director of a facility should be adequately qualified for
his or her task, with administrative ability and suitable
training and experience, and should carry out his or her duties
on a full-time basis.
87. In the performance of their duties, personnel of detention
facilities should respect and protect the human dignity and
fundamental human rights of all juveniles, in particular, as
(a) No member of the detention facility or institutional
personnel may inflict, instigate or tolerate any act of torture
or any form of harsh, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment,
punishment, correction or discipline under any pretext or
(b) All personnel should rigorously oppose and combat any act of
corruption, reporting it without delay to the competent
(c) All personnel should respect the present Rules. Personnel who
have reason to believe that a serious violation of the present
Rules has occurred or is about to occur should report the matter
to their superior authorities or organs vested with reviewing or
(d) All personnel should ensure the full protection of the
physical and mental health of juveniles, including protection
from physical, sexual and emotional abuse and exploitation, and
should take immediate action to secure medical attention whenever
(e) All personnel should respect the right of the juvenile to
privacy, and, in particular, should safeguard all confidential
matters concerning juveniles or their families learned as a
result of their professional capacity;
(f) All personnel should seek to minimize any differences between
life inside and outside the detention facility which tend to
lessen due respect for the dignity of juveniles as human beings.
APPENDIX III: UNITED NATIONS STANDARD MINIMUM RULES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE (THE BEIJING RULES)
United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration
of Juvenile Justice ("The Beijing Rules"), G.A. res. 40/33, annex, 40 U.N. GAOR
(No. 53) at 207, U.N. Doc. A/40/53 (1985).
1. Fundamental perspectives
1.1 Member States shall seek, in conformity with their respective
general interests, to further the well-being of the juvenile and
her or his family.
1.2 Member States shall endeavour to develop conditions that will
ensure for the juvenile a meaningful life in the community,
which, during that period in life when she or he is most
susceptible to deviant behaviour, will foster a process of
personal development and education that is as free from crime and
delinquency as possible.
1.3 Sufficient attention shall be given to positive measures that
involve the full mobilization of all possible resources,
including the family, volunteers and other community groups, as
well as schools and other community institutions, for the purpose
of promoting the well-being of the juvenile, with a view to
reducing the need for intervention under the law, and of
effectively, fairly and humanely dealing with the juvenile in
conflict with the law.
1.4 Juvenile justice shall be conceived as an integral part of
the national development process of each country, within a
comprehensive framework of social justice for all juveniles,
thus, at the same time, contributing to the protection of the
young and the maintenance of a peaceful order in society.
1.5 These Rules shall be implemented in the context of economic,
social and cultural conditions prevailing in each Member State.
1.6 Juvenile justice services shall be systematically developed
and coordinated with a view to improving and sustaining the
competence of personnel involved in the services, including their
methods, approaches and attitudes.
These broad fundamental perspectives refer to comprehensive
social policy in general and aim at promoting juvenile welfare to
the greatest possible extent, which will minimize the necessity
of intervention by the juvenile justice system, and in turn, will
reduce the harm that may be caused by any intervention. Such care
measures for the young, before the onset of delinquency, are
basic policy requisites designed to obviate the need for the
application of the Rules.
Rules 1.1 to 1.3 point to the important role that a constructive
social policy for juveniles will play, inter alia, in the
prevention of juvenile crime and delinquency. Rule 1.4 defines
juvenile justice as an integral part of social justice for
juveniles, while rule 1.6 refers to the necessity of constantly
improving juvenile justice, without falling behind the
development of progressive social policy for juveniles in general
and bearing in mind the need for consistent improvement of staff
Rule 1.5 seeks to take account of existing conditions in Member
States which would cause the manner of implementation of
particular rules necessarily to be different from the manner
adopted in other States.
2. Scope of the Rules and definitions used
2.1 The following Standard Minimum Rules shall be applied to
juvenile offenders impartially, without distinction of any kind,
for example as to race, colour, sex, language, religion,
political or other opinions, national or social origin, property,
birth or other status.
2.2 For purposes of these Rules, the following definitions shall
be applied by Member States in a manner which is compatible with
their respective legal systems and concepts:
(a) A juvenile is a child or young person who, under the
respective legal systems, may be dealt with for an offence in a
manner which is different from an adult;
(b) An offence is any behaviour (act or omission) that is
punishable by law under the respective legal systems;
(c) A juvenile offender is a child or young person who is alleged
to have committed or who has been found to have committed an
2.3 Efforts shall be made to establish, in each national
jurisdiction, a set of laws, rules and provisions specifically
applicable to juvenile offenders and institutions and bodies
entrusted with the functions of the administration of juvenile
justice and designed:
(a) To meet the varying needs of juvenile offenders, while
protecting their basic rights;
(b) To meet the needs of society;
(c) To implement the following rules thoroughly and fairly.
The Standard Minimum Rules are deliberately formulated so as to
be applicable within different legal systems and, at the same
time, to set some minimum standards for the handling of juvenile
offenders under any definition of a juvenile and under any system
of dealing with juvenile offenders. The Rules are always to be
applied impartially and without distinction of any kind.
Rule 2.1 therefore stresses the importance of the Rules always
being applied impartially and without distinction of any kind.
The rule follows the formulation of principle 2 of the
Declaration of the Rights of the Child.
Rule 2.2 defines "juvenile" and "offence" as the components of
the notion of the "juvenile offender", who is the main subject of
these Standard Minimum Rules (see, however, also rules 3 and 4).
It should be noted that age limits will depend on, and are
explicitly made dependent on, each respective legal system, thus
fully respecting the economic, social, political, cultural and
legal systems of Member States. This makes for a wide variety of
ages coming under the definition of "juvenile", ranging from 7
years to 18 years or above. Such a variety seems inevitable in
view of the different national legal systems and does not
diminish the impact of these Standard Minimum Rules.
Rule 2.3 is addressed to the necessity of specific national
legislation for the optimal implementation of these Standard
Minimum Rules, both legally and practically.
3. Extension of the Rules
3.1 The relevant provisions of the Rules shall be applied not
only to juvenile offenders but also to juveniles who may be
proceeded against for any specific behaviour that would not be
punishable if committed by an adult.
3.2 Efforts shall be made to extend the principles embodied in
the Rules to all juveniles who are dealt with in welfare and care
3.3 Efforts shall also be made to extend the principles embodied
in the Rules to young adult offenders.
Rule 3 extends the protection afforded by the Standard Minimum
Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice to cover:
(a) The so-called "status offences" prescribed in various
national legal systems where the range of behaviour considered to
be an offence is wider for juveniles than it is for adults (for
example, truancy, school and family disobedience, public
drunkenness, etc.) (rule 3.1);
(b) Juvenile welfare and care proceedings (rule 3.2);
(c) Proceedings dealing with young adult offenders, depending of
course on each given age limit (rule 3.3).
The extension of the Rules to cover these three areas seems to be
justified. Rule 3.1 provides minimum guarantees in those fields,
and rule 3.2 is considered a desirable step in the direction of
more fair, equitable and humane justice for all juveniles in
conflict with the law.
4. Age of criminal responsibility
4.1 In those legal systems recognizing the concept of the age of
criminal responsibility for juveniles, the beginning of that age
shall not be fixed at too low an age level, bearing in mind the
facts of emotional, mental and intellectual maturity.
The minimum age of criminal responsibility differs widely owing
to history and culture. The modern approach would be to consider
whether a child can live up to the moral and psychological
components of criminal responsibility; that is, whether a child,
by virtue of her or his individual discernment and understanding,
can be held responsible for essentially antisocial be ha vi our.
If the age of criminal responsibility is fixed too low or if
there is no lower age limit at all, the notion of responsibility
would become meaningless. In general, there is a close
relationship between the notion of responsibility for delinquent
or criminal behaviour and other social rights and
responsibilities (such as marital status, civil majority, etc.).
Efforts should therefore be made to agree on a reasonable lowest
age limit that is applicable internationally.
5. Aims of juvenile justice
5. 1 The juvenile justice system shall emphasize the well-being
of the juvenile and shall ensure that any reaction to juvenile
offenders shall always be in proportion to the circumstances of
both the offenders and the offence.
Rule 5 refers to two of the most important objectives of juvenile
justice. The first objective is the promotion of the well-being
of the juvenile. This is the main focus of those legal systems in
which juvenile offenders are dealt with by family courts or
administrative authorities, but the well-being of the juvenile
should also be emphasized in legal systems that follow the
criminal court model, thus contributing to the avoidance of
merely punitive sanctions. (See also rule 14.)
The second objective is "the principle of proportionality". This
principle is well-known as an instrument for curbing punitive
sanctions, mostly expressed in terms of just deserts in relation
to the gravity of the offence. The response to young offenders
should be based on the consideration not only of the gravity of
the offence but also of personal circumstances. The individual
circumstances of the offender (for example social status, family
situation, the harm caused by the offence or other factors
affecting personal circumstances) should influence the
proportionality of the reactions (for example by having regard to
the offender's endeavour to indemnify the victim or to her or his
willingness to turn to wholesome and useful life).
By the same token, reactions aiming to ensure the welfare of the
young offender may go beyond necessity and therefore infringe
upon the fundamental rights of the young individual, as has been
observed in some juvenile justice systems. Here, too, the
proportionality of the reaction to the circumstances of both the
offender and the offence, including the victim, should be
In essence, rule 5 calls for no less and no more than a fair
reaction in any given cases of juvenile delinquency and crime.
The issues combined in the rule may help to stimulate development
in both regards: new and innovative types of reactions are as
desirable as precautions against any undue widening of the net of
formal social control over juveniles.
6. Scope of discretion
6.1 In view of the varying special needs of juveniles as well as
the variety of measures available, appropriate scope for
discretion shall be allowed at all stages of proceedings and at
the different levels of juvenile justice administration,
including investigation, prosecution, adjudication and the
follow-up of dispositions.
6.2 Efforts shall be made, however, to ensure sufficient
accountability at all stages and levels in the exercise of any
6.3 Those who exercise discretion shall be specially qualified or
trained to exercise it judiciously and in accordance with their
functions and mandates.
Rules 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3 combine several important features of
effective, fair and humane juvenile justice administration: the
need to permit the exercise of discretionary power at all
significant levels of processing so that those who make
determinations can take the actions deemed to be most appropriate
in each individual case; and the need to provide checks and
balances in order to curb any abuses of discretionary power and
to safeguard the rights of the young offender. Accountability and
professionalism are instruments best apt to curb broad
discretion. Thus, professional qualifications and expert training
are emphasized here as a valuable means of ensuring the judicious
exercise of discretion in matters of juvenile offenders. (See
also rules 1.6 and 2.2.) The formulation of specific guidelines
on the exercise of discretion and the provision of systems of
review, appeal and the like in order to permit scrutiny of
decisions and accountability are emphasized in this context. Such
mechanisms are not specified here, as they do not easily lend
themselves to incorporation into international standard minimum
rules, which cannot possibly cover all differences in justice
7. Rights of juveniles
7.1 Basic procedural safeguards such as the presumption of
innocence, the right to be notified of the charges, the right to
remain silent, the right to counsel, the right to the presence of
a parent or guardian, the right to confront and cross-examine
witnesses and the right to appeal to a higher authority shall be
guaranteed at all stages of proceedings.
Rule 7.1 emphasizes some important points that represent
essential elements for a fair and just trial and that are
internationally recognized in existing human rights instruments.
(See also rule 14.) The presumption of innocence, for instance,
is also to be found in article 11 of the Universal Declaration of
Human rights and in article 14, paragraph 2, of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Rules 14 seq. of these Standard Minimum Rules specify issues that
are important for proceedings in juvenile cases, in particular,
while rule 7.1 affirms the most basic procedural safeguards in a
8. Protection of privacy
8.1 The juvenile's right to privacy shall be respected at all
stages in order to avoid harm being caused to her or him by undue
publicity or by the process of labelling.
8.2 In principle, no information that may lead to the
identification of a juvenile offender shall be published.
Rule 8 stresses the importance of the protection of the
juvenile's right to privacy. Young persons are particularly
susceptible to stigmatization. Criminological research into
labelling processes has provided evidence of the detrimental
effects (of different kinds) resulting from the permanent
identification of young persons as "delinquent" or "criminal".
Rule 8 stresses the importance of protecting the juvenile from
the adverse effects that may result from the publication in the
mass media of information about the case (for example the names
of young offenders, alleged or convicted). The interest of the
individual should be protected and upheld, at least in principle.
(The general contents of rule 8 are further specified in rule 2
9. Saving clause
9.1 Nothing in these Rules shall be interpreted as precluding the
application of the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of
Prisoners adopted by the United Nations and other human rights
instruments and standards recognized by the international
community that relate to the care and protection of the young.
Rule 9 is meant to avoid any misunderstanding in interpreting and
implementing the present Rules in conformity with principles
contained in relevant existing or emerging international human
rights instruments and standards-such as the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Declaration of
the Rights of the Child and the draft convention on the rights of
the child. It should be understood that the application of the
present Rules is without prejudice to any such international
instruments which may contain provisions of wider application.
(See also rule 27.)
INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION
10. Initial contact
10.1 Upon the apprehension of a juvenile, her or his parents or
guardian shall be immediately notified of such apprehension, and,
where such immediate notification is not possible, the parents or
guardian shall be notified within the shortest possible time
10.2 A judge or other competent official or body shall, without
delay, consider the issue of release.
10.3 Contacts between the law enforcement agencies and a juvenile
offender shall be managed in such a way as to respect the legal
status of the juvenile, promote the well-being of the juvenile
and avoid harm to her or hi m, with due regard to the
circumstances of the case.
Rule 10.1 is in principle contained in rule 92 of the Standard
Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners.
The question of release (rule 10.2) shall be considered without
delay by a judge or other competent official. The latter refers
to any person or institution in the broadest sense of the term,
including community boards or police authorities having power to
release an arrested person. (See also the International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights, article 9, paragraph 3.)
Rule 10.3 deals with some fundamental aspects of the procedures
and behaviour on the part of the police and other law enforcement
officials in cases of juvenile crime. To "avoid harm" admittedly
is flexible wording and covers many features of possible
interaction (for example the use of harsh language, physical
violence or exposure to the environment). Involvement in juvenile
justice processes in itself can be "harmful" to juveniles; the
term "avoid harm" should be broadly interpreted, therefore, as
doing the least harm possible to the juvenile in the first
instance, as well as any additional or undue harm. This is
especially important in the initial contact with law enforcement
agencies, which might profoundly influence the juvenile's
attitude towards the State and society. Moreover, the success of
any further intervention is largely dependent on such initial
contacts. Compassion and kind firmness are important in these
11.1 Consideration shall be given, wherever appropriate, to
dealing with juvenile offenders without resorting to formal trial
by the competent authority, referred to in rule 14.1 below.
11.2 The police, the prosecution or other agencies dealing with
juvenile cases shall be empowered to dispose of such cases, at
their discretion, without recourse to formal hearings, in
accordance with the criteria laid down for that purpose in the
respective legal system and also in accordance with the
principles contained in these Rules.
11.3 Any diversion involving referral to appropriate community or
other services shall require the consent of the juvenile, or her
or his parents or guardian, provided that such decision to refer
a case shall be subject to review by a competent authority, upon
11.4 In order to facilitate the discretionary disposition of
juvenile cases, efforts shall be made to provide for community
programmes, such as temporary supervision and guidance,
restitution, and compensation of victims.
Diversion, involving removal from criminal justice processing
and, frequently, redirection to community support services, is
commonly practised on a formal and informal basis in many legal
systems. This practice serves to hinder the negative effects of
subsequent proceedings in juvenile justice administration (for
example the stigma of conviction and sentence). In many cases,
non-intervention would be the best response. Thus, diversion at
the outset and without referral to alternative (social) services
may be the optimal response. This is especially the case where
the offence is of a non-serious nature and where the family, the
school or other informal social control institutions have already
reacted, or are likely to react, in an appropriate and
As stated in rule 11.2, diversion may be used at any point of
decision-making-by the police, the prosecution or other agencies
such as the courts, tribunals, boards or councils. It may be
exercised by one authority or several or all authorities,
according to the rules and policies of the respective systems and
in line with the present Rules. It need not necessarily be
limited to petty cases, thus rendering diversion an important
Rule 11.3 stresses the important requirement of securing the
consent of the young offender (or the parent or guardian) to the
recommended diversionary measure(s). (Diversion to community
service without such consent would contradict the Abolition of
Forced Labour Convention.) However, this consent should not be
left unchallengeable, since it might sometimes be given out of
sheer desperation on the part of the juvenile. The rule
underlines that care should be taken to minimize the potential
for coercion and intimidation at all levels in the diversion
process. Juveniles should not feel pressured (for example in
order to avoid court appearance) or be pressured into consenting
to diversion programmes. Thus, it is advocated that provision
should be made for an objective appraisal of the appropriateness
of dispositions involving young offenders by a "competent
authority upon application". (The "competent authority,' may be
different from that referred to in rule 14.)
Rule 11.4 recommends the provision of viable alternatives to
juvenile justice processing in the form of community-based
diversion. Programmes that involve settlement by victim
restitution and those that seek to avoid future conflict with the
law through temporary supervision and guidance are especially
commended. The merits of individual cases would make diversion
appropriate, even when more serious offences have been committed
(for example first offence, the act having been committed under
peer pressure, etc.).
12. Specialization within the police
12.1 In order to best fulfil their functions, police officers who
frequently or exclusively deal with juveniles or who are
primarily engaged in the prevention of juvenile crime shall be
specially instructed and trained. In large cities, special police
units should be established for that purpose.
Rule 12 draws attention to the need for specialized training for
all law enforcement officials who are involved in the
administration of juvenile justice. As police are the first point
of contact with the juvenile justice system, it is most important
that they act in an informed and appropriate manner.
While the relationship between urbanization and crime is clearly
complex, an increase in juvenile crime has been associated with
the growth of large cities, particularly with rapid and unplanned
growth. Specialized police units would therefore be
indispensable, not only in the interest of implementing specific
principles contained in the present instrument (such as rule 1.6)
but more generally for improving the prevention and control of
juvenile crime and the handling of juvenile offenders.
13. Detention pending trial
13.1 Detention pending trial shall be used only as a measure of
last resort and for the shortest possible period of time.
13.2 Whenever possible, detention pending trial shall be replaced
by alternative measures, such as close supervision, intensive
care or placement with a family or in an educational setting or
13.3 Juveniles under detention pending trial shall be entitled to
all rights and guarantees of the Standard Minimum Rules for the
Treatment of Prisoners adopted by the United Nations.
13.4 Juveniles under detention pending trial shall be kept
separate from adults and shall be detained in a separate
institution or in a separate part of an institution also holding
13.5 While in custody, juveniles shall receive care, protection
and all necessary individual assistance-social, educational,
vocational, psychological, medical and physical-that they may
require in view of their age, sex and personality.
The danger to juveniles of"criminal contamination" while in
detention pending trial must not be underestimated. It is
therefore important to stress the need for alternative measures.
By doing so, rule 13.1 encourages the devising of new and
innovative measures to avoid such detention in the interest of
the well-being of the juvenile. Juveniles under detention pending
trial are entitled to all the rights and guarantees of the
Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners as well as
the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
especially article 9 and article 10, paragraphs 2 (b) and 3.
Rule 13.4 does not prevent States from taking other measures
against the negative influences of adult offenders which are at
least as effective as the measures mentioned in the rule.
Different forms of assistance that may become necessary have been
enumerated to draw attention to the broad range of particular
needs of young detainees to be addressed (for example females or
males, drug addicts, alcoholics, mentally ill juveniles, young
persons suffering from the trauma, for example, of arrest, etc.).
Varying physical and psychological characteristics of young
detainees may warrant classification measures by which some are
kept separate while in detention pending trial, thus contributing
to the avoidance of victimization and rendering more appropriate
The Sixth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and
the Treatment of Offenders, in its resolution 4 on juvenile
justice standards, specified that the Rules, inter alia, should
reflect the basic principle that pre-trial detention should be
used only as a last resort, that no minors should be held in a
facility where they are vulnerable to the negative influences of
adult detainees and that account should always be taken of the
needs particular to their stage of development.
ADJUDICATION AND DISPOSITION
14. Competent authority to adjudicate
14.1 Where the case of a juvenile offender has not been diverted
(under rule 11), she or he shall be dealt with by the competent
authority (court, tribunal, board, council, etc.) according to
the principles of a fair and just trial.
14.2 The proceedings shall be conducive to the best interests of
the juvenile and shall be conducted in an atmosphere of
understanding, which shall allow the juvenile to participate
therein and to express herself or himself freely.
It is difficult to formulate a definition of the competent body
or person that would universally describe an adjudicating
authority. "Competent authority" is meant to include those who
preside over courts or tribunals (composed of a single judge or
of several members), including professional and lay magistrates
as well as administrative boards (for example the Scottish and
Scandinavian systems) or other more informal community and
conflict resolution agencies of an adjudicatory nature.
The procedure for dealing with juvenile offenders shall in any
case follow the minimum standards that are applied almost
universally for any criminal defendant under the procedure known
as "due process of law". In accordance with due process, a "fair
and just trial" includes such basic safeguards as the presumption
of innocence, the presentation and examination of witnesses, the
common legal defences, the right to remain silent, the right to
have the last word in a hearing, the right to appeal, etc. (See
also rule 7.1.)
15. Legal counsel, parents and guardians
15.1 Throughout the proceedings the juvenile shall have the right
to be represented by a legal adviser or to apply for free legal
aid where there is provision for such aid in the country.
15.2 The parents or the guardian shall be entitled to participate
in the proceedings and may be required by the competent authority
to attend them in the interest of the juvenile. They may,
however, be denied participation by the competent authority if
there are reasons to assume that such exclusion is necessary in
the interest of the juvenile.
Rule 15.1 uses terminology similar to that found in rule 93 of
the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners.
Whereas legal counsel and free legal aid are needed to assure the
juvenile legal assistance, the right of the parents or guardian
to participate as stated in rule 15.2 should be viewed as general
psychological and emotional assistance to the juvenile-a function
extending throughout the procedure.
The competent authority's search for an adequate disposition of
the case may pro fit, in particular, fro m the co-operation of
the legal representatives of the juvenile (or, for that matter,
some other personal assistant who the juvenile can and does
really trust). Such concern can be thwarted if the presence of
parents or guardians at the hearings plays a negative role, for
instance, if they display a hostile attitude towards the
juvenile, hence, the possibility of their exclusion must be
16. Social inquiry reports
16.1 In all cases except those involving minor offences, before
the competent authority renders a final disposition prior to
sentencing, the background and circumstances in which the
juvenile is living or the conditions under which the offence has
been committed shall be properly investigated so as to facilitate
judicious adjudication of the case by the competent authority.
Social inquiry reports (social reports or pre-sentence reports)
are an indispensable aid in most legal proceedings involving
juveniles. The competent authority should be informed of relevant
facts about the juvenile, such as social an d family background,
school career, educational experiences, etc. For this purpose,
some jurisdictions use special social services or personnel
attached to the court or board. Other personnel, including
probation officers, may serve the same function. The rule
therefore requires that adequate social services should be
available to deliver social inquiry reports of a qualified
17. Guiding principles in adjudication and disposition
17.1 The disposition of the competent authority shall be guided
by the following principles:
(a) The reaction taken shall always be in proportion not only to
the circumstances and the gravity of the offence but also to the
circumstances and the needs of the juvenile as well as to the
needs of the society;
(b) Restrictions on the personal liberty of the juvenile shall be
imposed only after careful consideration and shall be limited to
the possible minimum;
(c) Deprivation of personal liberty shall not be imposed unless
the juvenile is adjudicated of a serious act involving violence
against another person or of persistence in committing other
serious offences and unless there is no other appropriate
(d) The well-being of the juvenile shall be the guiding factor in
the consideration of her or his case.
17.2 Capital punishment shall not be imposed for any crime
committed by juveniles.
17.3 Juveniles shall not be subject to corporal punishment.
17.4 The competent authority shall have the power to discontinue
the proceedings at any time.
The main difficulty in formulating guidelines for the
adjudication of young persons stems from the fact that there are
unresolved conflicts of a philosophical nature, such as the
(a) Rehabilitation versus just desert;
(b) Assistance versus repression and punishment;
(c) Reaction according to the singular merits of an individual
case versus reaction according to the protection of society in
(d) General deterrence versus individual incapacitation.
The conflict between these approaches is more pronounced in
juvenile cases than in adult cases. With the variety of causes
and reactions characterizing juvenile cases, these alternatives
become intricately interwoven.
It is not the function of the Standard Minimum Rules for the
Administration of Juvenile Justice to prescribe which approach is
to be followed but rather to identify one that is most closely in
consonance with internationally accepted principles. Therefore
the essential elements as laid down in rule 17.1 , in particular
in subparagraphs (a) and (c), are mainly to be understood as
practical guidelines that should ensure a common starting point;
if heeded by the concerned authorities (see also rule 5), they
could contribute considerably to ensuring that the fundamental
rights of juvenile offenders are protected, especially the
fundamental rights of personal development and education.
Rule 17.1 (b) implies that strictly punitive approaches are not
appropriate. Whereas in adult cases, and possibly also in cases
of severe offences by juveniles, just desert and retributive
sanctions might be considered to have some merit, in juvenile
cases such considerations should always be outweighed by the
interest of safeguarding the well-being and the future of the
In line with resolution 8 of the Sixth United Nations Congress,
rule 17.1 (b) encourages the use of alternatives to
institutionalization to the maximum extent possible, bearing in
mind the need to respond to the specific requirements of the
young. Thus, full use should be made of the range of existing
alternative sanctions and new alternative sanctions should be
developed, bearing the public safety in mind. Probation should be
granted to the greatest possible extent via suspended sentences,
conditional sentences, board orders and other dispositions.
Rule 17.1 (c) corresponds to one of the guiding principles in
resolution 4 of the Sixth Congress which aims at avoiding
incarceration in the case of juveniles unless there is no other
appropriate response that will protect the public safety.
The provision prohibiting capital punishment in rule 17.2 is in
accordance with article 6, paragraph 5, of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The provision against corporal punishment is in line with article
7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and
the Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Being
Subjected to Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment, as well as the Convention against
Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment and the draft convention on the rights of the child.
The power to discontinue the proceedings at any time (rule 17.4)
is a characteristic inherent in the handling of juvenile
offenders as opposed to adults. At any time, circumstances may
become known to the competent authority which would make a
complete cessation of the intervention appear to be the best
disposition of the case.
18. Various disposition measures
18.1 A large variety of disposition measures shall be made
available to the competent authority, allowing for flexibility so
as to avoid institutionalization to the greatest extent possible.
Such measures, some of which may be combined, include:
(a) Care, guidance and supervision orders;
(c) Community service orders;
(d) Financial penalties, compensation and restitution;
(e) Intermediate treatment and other treatment orders;
(f) Orders to participate in group counselling and similar
(g) Orders concerning foster care, living communities or other
(h) Other relevant orders.
18.2 No juvenile shall be removed from parental supervision,
whether partly or entire l y, unless the circumstances of her or
his case make this necessary.
Rule 18.1 attempts to enumerate some of the important reactions
and sanctions that have been practised and proved successful thus
far, in different legal systems. On the whole they represent
promising opinions that deserve replication and further
development. The rule does not enumerate staffing requirements
because of possible shortages of adequate staff in some regions;
in those regions measures requiring less staff may be tried or
The examples given in rule 18.1 have in common, above all, a
reliance on and an appeal to the community for the effective
implementation of alternative dispositions. Community-based
correction is a traditional measure that has taken on many
aspects. On that basis, relevant authorities should be encouraged
to offer community-based services.
Rule 18.2 points to the importance of the family which, according
to article 10, paragraph l, of the International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, is "the natural and
fundamental group unit of society". Within the family, the
parents have not only the right but also the responsibility to
care for and supervise their children. Rule 18.2, therefore,
requires that the separation of children from their parents is a
measure of last resort. It may be resorted to only when the facts
of the case clearly warrant this grave step (for example child
19. Least possible use of institutionalization
19.1 The placement of a juvenile in an institution shall always
be a disposition of last resort and for the minimum necessary
Progressive criminology advocates the use of non-institutional
over institutional treatment. Little or no difference has been
found in terms of the success of institutionalization as compared
to non-institutionalization. The many adverse influences on an
individual that seem unavoidable within any institutional setting
evidently cannot be outbalanced by treatment efforts. This is
especially the case for juveniles, who are vulnerable to negative
influences. Moreover, the negative effects, not only of loss of
liberty but also of separation from the usual social environment,
are certainly more acute for juveniles than for adults because of
their early stage of development.
Rule 19 aims at restricting institutionalization in two regards:
in quantity ("last resort,,) and in time ("minimum necessary
period"). Rule 19 reflects one of the basic guiding principles of
resolution 4 of the Sixth United Nations Congress: a juvenile
offender should not be incarcerated unless there is no other
appropriate response. The rule, therefore, makes the appeal that
if a juvenile must be institutionalized, the loss of liberty
should be restricted to the least possible degree, with special
institutional arrangements for confinement and bearing in mind
the differences in kinds of offenders, offences and institutions.
In fact, priority should be given to "open" over "closed"
institutions. Furthermore, any facility should be of a
correctional or educational rather than of a prison type.
20. Avoidance of unnecessary delay
20.1 Each case shall from the outset be handled expeditiously,
without any unnecessary delay.
The speedy conduct of formal procedures in juvenile cases is a
paramount concern. Otherwise whatever good may be achieved by the
procedure and the disposition is at risk. As time passes, the
juvenile will find it increasingly difficult, if not impossible,
to relate the procedure and disposition to the offence, both
intellectually and psychologically.
21.1 Records of juvenile offenders shall be kept strictly
confidential and closed to third parties. Access to such records
shall be limited to persons directly concerned with the
disposition of the case at hand or other duly authorized persons.
21.2 Records of juvenile offenders shall not be used in adult
proceedings in subsequent cases involving the same offender.
The rule attempts to achieve a balance between conflicting
interests connected with records or files: those of the police,
prosecution and other authorities in improving control versus the
interests of the juvenile offender. (See also rule 8.) "Other
duly authorized persons" would generally include among others,
22. Need for professionalism and training
22.1 Professional education, in-service training, refresher
courses and other appropriate modes of instruction shall be
utilized to establish and maintain the necessary professional
competence of all personnel dealing with juvenile cases.
22.2 Juvenile justice personnel shall reflect the diversity of
juveniles who come into contact with the juvenile justice system.
Efforts shall be made to ensure the fair representation of women
and minorities in juvenile justice agencies.
The authorities competent for disposition may be persons with
very different backgrounds (magistrates in the United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Northern Ireland and in regions influenced by
the common law system; legally trained judges in countries using
Roman law and in regions influenced by them; and elsewhere
elected or appointed laymen or jurists, members of
community-based boards, etc.). For all these authorities, a
minimum training in law, sociology, psychology, criminology and
behavioural sciences would be required. This is considered as
important as the organizational specialization and independence
of the competent authority.
For social workers and probation officers, it might not be
feasible to require professional specialization as a prerequisite
for taking over any function dealing with juvenile offenders.
Thus, professional on-the job instruction would be minimum
Professional qualifications are an essential element in ensuring
the impartial and effective administration of juvenile justice.
Accordingly, it is necessary to improve the recruitment,
advancement and professional training of personnel and to provide
them with the necessary means to enable them to properly fulfil
All political, social, sexual, racial, religious, cultural or any
other kind of discrimination in the selection, appointment and
advancement of juvenile justice personnel should be avoided in
order to achieve impartiality in the administration of juvenile
justice. This was recommended by the Sixth Congress. Furthermore,
the Sixth Congress called on Member States to ensure the fair and
equal treatment of women as criminal justice personnel and
recommended that special measures should be taken to recruit,
train and facilitate the advancement of female personnel in
juvenile justice administration.
23. Effective implementation of disposition
23.1 Appropriate provisions shall be made for the implementation
of orders of the competent authority, as referred to in rule 14.1
above, by that authority itself or by some other authority as
circumstances may require
23.2 Such provisions shall include the power to modify the orders
as the competent authority may deem necessary from time to time,
provided that such modification shall be determined in accordance
with the principles contained in these Rules.
Disposition in juvenile cases, more so than in adult cases, tends
to influence the offender's life for a long period of time. Thus,
it is important that the competent authority or an independent
body (parole board, probation office, youth welfare institutions
or others) with qualifications equal to those of the competent
authority that originally disposed of the case should monitor the
implementation of the disposition. In some countries, a juge de
l'execution des peines has been installed for this purpose.
The composition, powers and functions of the authority must be
flexible; they are described in general terms in rule 23 in order
to ensure wide acceptability.
24. Provision of needed assistance
24.1 Efforts shall be made to provide juveniles, at all stages of
the proceedings, with necessary assistance such as lodging,
education or vocational training, employment or any other
assistance, helpful and practical, in order to facilitate the
The promotion of the well-being of the juvenile is of paramount
consideration. Thus, rule 24 emphasizes the importance of
providing requisite facilities, services and other necessary
assistance as may further the best interests of the juvenile
throughout the rehabilitative process.
25. Mobilization of volunteers and other community services
25.1 Volunteers, voluntary organizations, local institutions and
other community resources shall be called upon to contribute
effectively to the rehabilitation of the juvenile in a community
setting and, as far as possible, within the family unit.
This rule reflects the need for a rehabilitative orientation of
all work with juvenile offenders. Co-operation with the community
is indispensable if the directives of the competent authority are
to be carried out effectively. Volunteers and voluntary services,
in particular, have proved to be valuable resources but are at
present underutilized. In some instances, the co-operation of
ex-offenders (including ex-addicts) can be of considerable
Rule 25 emanates from the principles laid down in rules 1.1 to
1.6 and follows the relevant provisions of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
26. Objectives of institutional treatment
26.1 The objective of training and treatment of juveniles placed
in institutions is to provide care, protection, education and
vocational skills, with a view to assisting them to assume
socially constructive and productive roles in society.
26.2 Juveniles in institutions shall receive care, protection and
all necessary assistance-social, educational, vocational,
psychological, medical and physical-that they may require because
of their age, sex, and personality and in the interest of their
wholesome development .
26.3 Juveniles in institutions shall be kept separate from adults
and shall be detained in a separate institution or in a separate
part of an institution also holding adults.
26.4 Young female offenders placed in an institution deserve
special attention as to their personal needs and problems. They
shall by no means receive less care, protection, assistance,
treatment and training than young male offenders. Their fair
treatment shall be ensured.
26.5 In the interest and well-being of the institutionalized
juvenile, the parents or guardians shall have a right of access.
26.6 Inter-ministerial and inter-departmental co-operation shall
be fostered for the purpose of providing adequate academic or, as
appropriate, vocational training to institutionalized juveniles,
with a view to ensuring that they do not leave the institution at
an educational disadvantage.
The objectives of institutional treatment as stipulated in rules
26.1 and 26.2 would be acceptable to any system and culture.
However, they have not yet been attained everywhere, and much
more has to be done in this respect.
Medical and psychological assistance, in particular, are
extremely important for institutionalized drug addicts, violent
and mentally ill young persons.
The avoidance of negative influences through adult offenders and
the safeguarding of the well-being of juveniles in an
institutional setting, as stipulated in rule 26.3, are in line
with one of the basic guiding principles of the Rules, as set out
by the Sixth Congress in its resolution 4. The rule does not
prevent States from taking other measures against the negative
influences of adult offenders, which are at least as effective as
the measures mentioned in the rule. (See also rule 13.4)
Rule 26.4 addresses the fact that female offenders normally
receive less attention than their male counterparts. as pointed
out by the Sixth Congress. In particular, resolution 9 of the
Sixth Congress calls for the fair treatment of female offenders
at every stage of criminal justice processes and for special
attention to their particular problems and needs while in
custody. Moreover, this rule should also be considered in the
light of the Caracas Declaration of the Sixth Congress, which,
inter alia, calls for equal treatment in criminal justice
administration, and against the background of the Declaration on
the Elimination of Discrimination against Women and the
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
The right of access (rule 26.5) follows from the provisions of
rules 7.1, 10.1, 15.2 and 18.2. Inter-ministerial and
inter-departmental co-operation (rule 26.6) are of particular
importance in the interest of generally enhancing the quality of
institutional treatment and training.
27. Application of the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment
of Prisoners adopted by the United Nations
27.1 The Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners
and related recommendations shall be applicable as far as
relevant to the treatment of juvenile offenders in institutions,
including those in detention pending adjudication.
27.2 Efforts shall be made to implement the relevant principles
laid down in the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of
Prisoners to the largest possible extent so as to meet the
varying needs of juveniles specific to their age, sex and
The Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners were
among the first instruments of this kind to be promulgated by the
United Nations. It is generally agreed that they have had a
world-wide impact. Although there are still countries where
implementation is more an aspiration than a fact, those Standard
Minimum Rules continue to be an important influence in the humane
and equitable administration of correctional institutions.
Some essential protections covering juvenile offenders in
institutions are contained in the Standard Minimum Rules for the
Treatment of Prisoners (accommodation, architecture, bedding,
clothing, complaints and requests, contact with the outside
world, food, medical care, religious service, separation of ages,
staffing, work, etc.) as are provisions concerning punishment and
discipline, and restraint for dangerous offenders. It would not
be appropriate to modify those Standard Minimum Rules according
to the particular characteristics of institutions for juvenile
offenders within the scope of the Standard Minimum Rules for the
Administration of Juvenile Justice.
Rule 27 focuses on the necessary requirements for juveniles in
institutions (rule 27.1) as well as on the varying needs specific
to their age, sex and personality (rule 27.2). Thus, the
objectives and content of the rule interrelate to the relevant
provisions of the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of
28. Frequent and early recourse to conditional release
28.1 Conditional release from an institution shall be used by the
appropriate authority to the greatest possible extent, and shall
be granted at the earliest possible time.
28.2 Juveniles released conditionally from an institution shall
be assisted and supervised by an appropriate authority and shall
receive full support by the community.
The power to order conditional release may rest with the
competent authority, as mentioned in rule 14.1 or with some other
authority. In view of this, it is adequate to refer here to the
"appropriate,' rather than to the "competent" authority.
Circumstances permitting, conditional release shall be preferred
to serving a full sentence. Upon evidence of satisfactory
progress towards rehabilitation, even offenders who had been
deemed dangerous at the time of their institutionalization can be
conditionally released whenever feasible. Like probation , such
release may be conditional on the satisfactory fulfilment of the
requirements specified by the relevant authorities for a period
of time established in the decision, for example relating to
"good behaviour" of the offender, attendance in community
programmes, residence in half-way houses, etc.
In the case of offenders conditionally released from an
institution, assistance and supervision by a probation or other
officer (particularly where probation has not yet been adopted)
should be provided and community support should be encouraged.
29. Semi-institutional arrangements
29.1 Efforts shall be made to provide semi-institutional
arrangements, such as half-way houses, educational homes,
day-time training centres and other such appropriate arrangements
that may assist juveniles in their proper reintegration into
The importance of care following a period of institutionalization
should not be underestimated. This rule emphasizes the necessity
of forming a net of semi-institutional arrangements.
This rule also emphasizes the need for a diverse range of
facilities and services designed to meet the different needs of
young offenders re-entering the community and to provide guidance
and structural support as an important step towards successful
reintegration into society.
RESEARCH, PLANNING, POLICY FORMULATION AND EVALUATION
30. Research as a basis for planning, policy formulation and
30.1 Efforts shall be made to organize and promote necessary
research as a basis for effective planning and policy
30.2 Efforts shall be made to review and appraise periodically
the trends, problems and causes of juvenile delinquency and crime
as well as the varying particular needs of juveniles in custody.
30.3 Efforts shall be made to establish a regular evaluative
research mechanism built into the system of juvenile justice
administration and to collect and analyse relevant data and
information for appropriate assessment and future improvement and
reform of the administration.
30.4 The delivery of services in juvenile justice administration
shall be systematically planned and implemented as an integral
part of national development efforts.
The utilization of research as a basis for an informed juvenile
justice policy is widely acknowledged as an important mechanism
for keeping practices abreast of advances in knowledge and the
continuing development and improvement of the juvenile justice
system. The mutual feedback between research and policy is
especially important in juvenile justice. With rapid and often
drastic changes in the life-styles of the young and in the forms
and dimensions of juvenile crime, the societal and justice
responses to juvenile crime and delinquency quickly become
outmoded and inadequate.
Rule 30 thus establishes standards for integrating research into
the process of policy formulation and application in juvenile
justice administration. The rule draws particular attention to
the need for regular review and evaluation of existing programmes
and measures and for planning within the broader context of
overall development objectives.
A constant appraisal of the needs of juveniles, as well as the
trends and problems of delinquency, is a prerequisite for
improving the methods of formulating appropriate policies and
establishing adequate interventions, at both formal and informal
levels. In this context, research by independent persons and
bodies should be facilitated by responsible agencies, and it may
be valuable to obtain and to take into account the views of
juveniles themselves, not only those who come into contact with
The process of planning must particularly emphasize a more
effective and equitable system for the delivery of necessary
services. Towards that end, there should be a comprehensive and
regular assessment of the wide-ranging, particular needs and
problems of juveniles and an identification of clear-cut priori
ties. In that connection, there should also be a co-ordination in
the use of existing resources, including alternatives and
community support that would be suitable in setting up specific
procedures designed to implement and monitor established
United Nations Guidelines for the Prevention of Juvenile
Delinquency (The Riyadh Guidelines), G.A. res. 45/112, annex, 45
U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 49A) at 201, U.N. Doc. A/45/49 (1990).
I. FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
1. The prevention of juvenile delinquency is an essential part of
crime prevention in society. By engaging in lawful, socially
useful activities and adopting a humanistic orientation towards
society and outlook on life, young persons can develop
2. The successful prevention of juvenile delinquency requires
efforts on the part of the entire society to ensure the
harmonious development of adolescents, with respect for and
promotion of their personality from early childhood.
3. For the purposes of the interpretation of the present
Guidelines, a child-centred orientation should be pursued. Young
persons should have an active role and partnership within society
and should not be considered as mere objects of socialization or
4. In the implementation of the present Guidelines, in accordance
with national legal systems, the well-being of young persons from
their early childhood should be the focus of any preventive
5. The need for and importance of progressive delinquency
prevention policies and the systematic study and the elaboration
of measures should be recognized. These should avoid
criminalizing and penalizing a child for behaviour that does not
cause serious damage to the development of the child or harm to
others. Such policies and measures should involve:
(a) The provision of opportunities, in particular educational
opportunities, to meet the varying needs of young persons and to
serve as a supportive framework for safeguarding the personal
development of all young persons, particularly those who are
demonstrably endangered or at social risk and are in need of
special care and protection;
(b) Specialized philosophies and approaches for delinquency
prevention, on the basis of laws, processes, institutions,
facilities and a service delivery network aimed at reducing the
motivation, need and opportunity for, or conditions giving rise
to, the commission of infractions;
(c) Official intervention to be pursued primarily in the overall
interest of the young person and guided by fairness and equity;
(d) Safeguarding the well-being, development, rights and
interests of all young persons;
(e) Consideration that youthful behaviour or conduct that does
not conform to overall social norms and values is often part of
the maturation and growth process and tends to disappear
spontaneously in most individuals with the transition to
(f) Awareness that, in the predominant opinion of experts,
labelling a young person as "deviant'', "delinquent" or
"pre-delinquent" often contributes to the development of a
consistent pattern of undesirable behaviour by young persons.
6. Community-based services and programmes should be
developed for the prevention of juvenile delinquency, particularly where no
agencies have yet been established. Formal agencies of social
control should only be utilized as a means of last resort.
II. SCOPE OF THE GUIDELINES
7. The present Guidelines should be interpreted and implemented
within the broad framework of the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights, the Declaration of the Rights of the Child and
the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and in the context of
the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the
Administration of Juvenile Justice (The Beijing Rules), as well as other
instruments and norms relating to the rights, interests and
well-being of all children and young persons.
8. The present Guidelines should also be implemented in the
context of the economic, social and cultural conditions
prevailing in each Member State.
III. GENERAL PREVENTION
9. Comprehensive prevention plans should be instituted at every
level of Government and include the following:
(a) In-depth analyses of the problem and inventories of
programmes, services, facilities and resources available;
(b) Well-defined responsibilities for the qualified agencies,
institutions and personnel involved in preventive efforts;
(c) Mechanisms for the appropriate co-ordination of prevention
efforts between governmental and non-governmental agencies;
(d) Policies, programmes and strategies based on prognostic
studies to be continuously monitored and carefully evaluated in
the course of implementation;
(e) Methods for effectively reducing the opportunity to commit
(f) Community involvement through a wide range of services and
(g) Close interdisciplinary co-operation between national, State,
provincial and local governments, with the involvement of the
private sector representative citizens of the community to be
served, and labour, child-care, health education, social, law
enforcement and judicial agencies in taking concerted action to
prevent juvenile delinquency and youth crime;
(h) Youth participation in delinquency prevention policies and
processes, including recourse to community resources, youth
self-help, and victim compensation and assistance programmes;
(i) Specialized personnel at all levels.
IV. SOCIALIZATION PROCESSES
10. Emphasis should be placed on preventive policies facilitating
the successful socialization and integration of all children and
young persons, in particular through the family, the community,
peer groups, schools, vocational training and the world of work,
as well as through voluntary organizations. Due respect should be
given to the proper personal development of children and young
persons, and they should be accepted as full and equal partners
in socialization and integration processes.
11. Every society should place a high priority on the needs and
well-being of the family and of all its members.
12. Since the family is the central unit responsible for the
primary socialization of children, governmental and social
efforts to preserve the integrity of the family, including the
extended family, should be pursued. The society has a
responsibility to assist the family in providing care and
protection and in ensuring the physical and mental well-being of
children. Adequate arrangements including day-care should be
13. Governments should establish policies that are conducive to
the bringing up of children in stable and settled family
environments. Families in need of assistance in the resolution of
conditions of instability or conflict should be provided with
14. Where a stable and settled family environment is lacking and
when community efforts to assist parents in this regard have
failed and the extended family cannot fulfil this role,
alternative placements, including foster care and adoption,
should be considered. Such placements should replicate, to the
extent possible, a stable and settled family environment, while,
at the same time, establishing a sense of permanency for
children, thus avoiding problems associated with "foster drift".
15. Special attention should be given to children of families
affected by problems brought about by rapid and uneven economic,
social and cultural change, in particular the children of
indigenous, migrant and refugee families. As such changes may
disrupt the social capacity of the family to secure the
traditional rearing and nurturing of children, often as a result
of role and culture conflict, innovative and socially
constructive modalities for the socialization of children have to
16. Measures should be taken and programmes developed to
provide families with the opportunity to learn about parental roles and
obligations as regards child development and child care,
promoting positive parent-child relationships, sensitizing
parents to the problems of children and young persons and
encouraging their involvement in family and community-based
17. Governments should take measures to promote family cohesion
and harmony and to discourage the separation of children from
their parents, unless circumstances affecting the welfare and
future of the child leave no viable alternative.
18. It is important to emphasize the socialization function of
the family and extended family; it is also equally important to
recognize the future role, responsibilities, participation and
partnership of young persons in society.
19. In ensuring the right of the child to proper socialization,
Governments and other agencies should rely on existing social and
legal agencies, but, whenever traditional institutions and
customs are no longer effective, they should also provide and
allow for innovative measures.
20. Governments are under an obligation to make public education
accessible to all young persons.
21. Education systems should, in addition to their academic and
vocational training activities, devote particular attention to
(a) Teaching of basic values and developing respect for the
child's own cultural identity and patterns, for the social values
of the country in which the child is living, for civilizations
different from the child's own and for human rights and
(b) Promotion and development of the personality, talents and
mental and physical abilities of young people to their fullest
(c) Involvement of young persons as active and effective
participants in, rather than mere objects of, the educational
(d) Undertaking activities that foster a sense of identity with
and of belonging to the school and the community;
(e) Encouragement of young persons to understand and respect
diverse views and opinions, as well as cultural and other
(f) Provision of information and guidance regarding vocational
training, employment opportunities and career development;
(g) Provision of positive emotional support to young persons and
the avoidance of psychological maltreatment;
(h) Avoidance of harsh disciplinary measures, particularly
22. Educational systems should seek to work together with
parents, community organizations and agencies concerned with the
activities of young persons.
23. Young persons and their families should be informed about the
law and their rights and responsibilities under the law, as well
as the universal value system, including United Nations
24. Educational systems should extend particular care and
attention to young persons who are at social risk. Specialized
prevention programmes and educational materials, curricula,
approaches and tools should be developed and fully utilized.
25. Special attention should be given to comprehensive policies
and strategies for the prevention of alcohol, drug and other
substance abuse by young persons. Teachers and other
professionals should be equipped and trained to prevent and deal
with these problems. Information on the use and abuse of drugs,
including alcohol, should be made available to the student body.
26. Schools should serve as resource and referral centres for the
provision of medical, counselling and other services to young
persons, particularly those with special needs and suffering from
abuse, neglect, victimization and exploitation.
27. Through a variety of educational programmes, teachers and
other adults and the student body should be sensitized to the
problems, needs and perceptions of young persons, particularly
those belonging to underprivileged, disadvantaged, ethnic or
other minority and low-income groups.
28. School systems should attempt to meet and promote the highest
professional and educational standards with respect to curricula,
teaching and learning methods and approaches, and the recruitment
and training of qualified teachers. Regular monitoring and
assessment of performance by the appropriate professional
organizations and authorities should be ensured.
29. School systems should plan, develop and implement
extracurricular activities of interest to young persons, in
co-operation with community groups.
30. Special assistance should be given to children and young
persons who find it difficult to comply with attendance codes,
and to "drop-outs".
31. Schools should promote policies and rules that are fair and
just; students should be represented in bodies formulating school
policy, including policy on discipline, and decision-making.
32. Community-based services and programmes which respond to
the special needs, problems, interests and concerns of young persons
and which offer appropriate counselling and guidance to young
persons and their families should be developed, or strengthened
where they exist.
33. Communities should provide, or strengthen where they exist, a
wide range of community-based support measures for young
persons, including community development centres, recreational facilities
and services to respond to the special problems of children who
are at social risk. In providing these helping measures, respect
for individual rights should be ensured.
34. Special facilities should be set up to provide adequate
shelter for young persons who are no longer able to live at home
or who do not have homes to live in.
35. A range of services and helping measures should be provided
to deal with the difficulties experienced by young persons in the
transition to adulthood. Such services should include special
programmes for young drug abusers which emphasize care,
counselling, assistance and therapy-oriented interventions.
36. Voluntary organizations providing services for young persons
should be given financial and other support by Governments and
37. Youth organizations should be created or strengthened at the
local level and given full participatory status in the management
of community affairs. These organizations should encourage youth
to organize collective and voluntary projects, particularly
projects aimed at helping young persons in need of assistance.
38. Government agencies should take special responsibility and
provide necessary services for homeless or street children;
information about local facilities, accommodation, employment
and other forms and sources of help should be made readily available
to young persons.
39. A wide range of recreational facilities and services of
particular interest to young persons should be established and
made easily accessible to them.
D. Mass media
40. The mass media should be encouraged to ensure that young
persons have access to information and material from a diversity
of national and international sources.
41. The mass media should be encouraged to portray the positive
contribution of young persons to society.
42. The mass media should be encouraged to disseminate
information on the existence of services, facilities and
opportunities for young persons in society.
43. The mass media generally, and the television and film media
in particular, should be encouraged to minimize the level of
pornography, drugs and violence portrayed and to display violence
and exploitation disfavourably, as well as to avoid demeaning and
degrading presentations, especially of children, women and
interpersonal relations, and to promote egalitarian principles
44. The mass media should be aware of its extensive social role
and responsibility, as well as its influence, in communications
relating to youthful drug and alcohol abuse. It should use its
power for drug abuse prevention by relaying consistent messages
through a balanced approach. Effective drug awareness campaigns
at all levels should be promoted.
V. SOCIAL POLICY
45. Government agencies should give high priority to plans and
programmes for young persons and should provide sufficient funds
and other resources for the effective delivery of services,
facilities and staff for adequate medical and mental health care,
nutrition, housing and other relevant services, including drug
and alcohol abuse prevention and treatment, ensuring that such
resources reach and actually benefit young persons.
46. The institutionalization of young persons should be a measure
of last resort and for the minimum necessary period, and the best
interests of the young person should be of paramount importance.
Criteria authorizing formal intervention of this type should be
strictly defined and limited to the following situations:
(a) where the child or young person has suffered harm that has
been inflicted by the parents or guardians;
(b) where the child or young person has been sexually, physically
or emotionally abused by the parents or guardians;
(c) where the child or young person has been neglected, abandoned
or exploited by the parents or guardians;
(d) where the child or young person is threatened by physical or
moral danger due to the behaviour of the parents or guardians; and
(e) where a serious physical or psychological danger to the
child or young person has manifested itself in his or her own
behaviour and neither the parents, the guardians, the juvenile
himself or herself nor non-residential community services can
meet the danger by means other than institutionalization.
47. Government agencies should provide young persons with the
opportunity of continuing in full-time education, funded by the
State where parents or guardians are unable to support the young
persons, and of receiving work experience.
48. Programmes to prevent delinquency should be planned and
developed on the basis of reliable, scientific research findings,
and periodically monitored, evaluated and adjusted accordingly.
49. Scientific information should be disseminated to the
professional community and to the public at large about the sort
of behaviour or situation which indicates or may result in
physical and psychological victimization, harm and abuse, as well
as exploitation, of young persons.
50. Generally, participation in plans and programmes should be
voluntary. Young persons themselves should be involved in their
formulation, development and implementation.
51. Government should begin or continue to explore, develop and
implement policies, measures and strategies within and outside
the criminal justice system to prevent domestic violence against
and affecting young persons and to ensure fair treatment to these
victims of domestic violence.
VI. LEGISLATION AND JUVENILE JUSTICE
52. Governments should enact and enforce specific laws and
procedures to promote and protect the rights and well-being of
all young persons.
53. Legislation preventing the victimization, abuse, exploitation
and the use for criminal activities of children and young persons
should be enacted and enforced.
54. No child or young person should be subjected to harsh or
degrading correction or punishment measures at home, in schools
or in any other institutions.
55. Legislation and enforcement aimed at restricting and
controlling accessibility of weapons of any sort to children and
young persons should be pursued.
56. In order to prevent further stigmatization, victimization and
criminalization of young persons, legislation should be enacted
to ensure that any conduct not considered an offence or not
penalized if committed by an adult is not considered an offence
and not penalized if committed by a young person.
57. Consideration should be given to the establishment of an
office of ombudsman or similar independent organ, which would
ensure that the status, rights and interests of young persons are
upheld and that proper referral to available services is made.
The ombudsman or other organ designated would also supervise
the implementation of the Riyadh Guidelines, the Beijing Rules and
the Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their
Liberty. The ombudsman or other organ would, at regular
intervals, publish a report on the progress made and on the
difficulties encountered in the implementation of the instrument.
Child advocacy services should also be established.
58. Law enforcement and other relevant personnel, of both sexes,
should be trained to respond to the special needs of young
persons and should be familiar with and use, to the maximum
extent possible, programmes and referral possibilities for the
diversion of young persons from the justice system.
59. Legislation should be enacted and strictly enforced to
protect children and young persons from drug abuse and drug
VII. RESEARCH, POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND
60. Efforts should be made and appropriate mechanisms
established to promote, on both a multidisciplinary and an intradisciplinary
basis, interaction and co-ordination between economic, social,
education and health agencies and services, the justice system,
youth, community and development agencies and other relevant
61. The exchange of information, experience and expertise gained
through projects, programmes, practices and initiatives relating
to youth crime, delinquency prevention and juvenile justice
should be intensified at the national, regional and international
62. Regional and international co-operation on matters of youth
crime, delinquency prevention and juvenile justice involving
practitioners, experts and decision makers should be further
developed and strengthened.
63. Technical and scientific co-operation on practical and
policy-related matters, particularly in training, pilot and
demonstration projects, and on specific issues concerning the
prevention of youth crime and juvenile delinquency should be
strongly supported by all Governments, the United Nations system
and other concerned organizations.
64. Collaboration should be encouraged in undertaking scientific
research with respect to effective modalities for youth crime and
juvenile delinquency prevention and the findings of such research
should be widely disseminated and evaluated.
65. Appropriate United Nations bodies, institutes, agencies and
offices should pursue close collaboration and co-ordination on
various questions related to children juvenile justice and youth
crime and juvenile delinquency prevention.
66. On the basis of the present Guidelines, the United Nations
Secretariat, in co-operation with interested institutions, should
play an active role in the conduct of research, scientific
collaboration, the formulation of policy options and the review
and monitoring of their implementation, and should serve as a
source of reliable information on effective modalities for
1 BG (not his actual initials), age eighteen. To preserve the anonymity of the children the initials used to identify a child bear no relation to the actual initials or name of the child.
2 EM, age fifteen.
3 The word "children" is used in this report to mean anyone under the age of eighteen. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child defines a child as "every human being below the age of eighteen years unless, under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier" (Article 1).
4 Annie E. Casey Foundation, 1994 Data Book on Louisiana's Children (1994).
5 LSA-Ch.C. Added by Acts 1991, No. 235, para. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1992.
6 Because Human Rights Watch visited only two detention centers for children, the Rivarde Memorial Home in Jefferson Parish and the Youth Study Center in Orleans Parish, this report does not attempt to evaluate conditions in all detention centers in the state. Although the conditions at the detention facilities are not included, Human Rights Watch extends its thanks to Superintendent Richard Winder of the Youth Study Center, Dr. Walter Maestri, Director ofJuvenile Services in Jefferson Parish and his staff and Mr. Ernest Thomas, Detention Home Supervisor at Rivarde Memorial Home; all of whom were helpful to us.
7 Now known as the Jetson Correctional Center for Youth (JCCY).
8 G.A. Res. 44/25, November 20, 1989; entered into force September 2, 1990.
9 G.A. Res. 45/113, April 2, 1991.
10 G.A. Res. 40/33, November 29, 1985.
11 G.A. Res. 45/112, March 28, 1991.
12 ECOSOC Res. 663 C (XXIV), July 31, 1957, and 2076 (LXII), May 13, 1977.
13 G.A. Res. 43/173, December 9, 1988.
14 As a result of the emphasis on naturalization and treatment in the standards applicable to children, many of the requirements are more detailed than the standards applicable to adults. For example, the specifications for the physical environment of adult facilities deal primarily with the tangible material environment like the size of the cell, the bed, the shower and the toilet. The standards for children's facilities call for facilities small enough to enable individualized treatment and of a design in keeping with the rehabilitative aims. There are virtually no programming requirements for adult facilities. Institutions housing children are required to provide education, vocational training and work opportunities, as well as recreational and physical training. Solitary confinement is prohibited for children, though not for adults.
15 Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 99 S.Ct. 1861 (1979).
16 References to U.S. Constitutional Law will draw on a paper by Sue Burrell, Staff Attorney at the Youth Law Center in San Francisco, entitled, Legal Issues Relating to Conditions of Confinement for Detained Children, presented at the NJDA 6th Annual National Juvenile Services Training Institute, 1994. See also Soler et al., Representing the Child Client, (Matthew Bender Publishing, 1994).
17 Pena v. New York State Division for Youth, 419 f. Supp. 203 (S.D.N.Y. 1976).
18 Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307, 102 S.Ct. 2452 (1982).
19 ACA, Standards for Juvenile Training Schools, 3rd ed., May 1991, p. xiv.
20 For example, ACA standards allow the use of isolation for up to five days, whereas international standards prohibit its use for children.
21 42 USC 5601.
22 Interview with Mark Soler, President, Youth Law Center, September 8, 1995.
23 A status offense is an action which, if carried out by an adult, would not be illegal; for example, truancy or running away from home.
24 Section 223(a)(3) of the Act provides for the formation of a state advisory group to prepare the plan for use of the federal funds.
25 The five sets of standards referred to are: i) standards published by the Task Force on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention in Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention in 1976; ii) ACA standards; iii) Architecture of Facilities, Corrections Administration, and Interim Status: The Release, Control, and Detention of Accused Juvenile Offenders between Arrest and Disposition published in 1979 by the Institute of Judicial Administration/American Bar Association's Juvenile Justice Standards Project; iv) Standards for the Administration of Juvenile Justice published in 1980 by the National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; and v) Standards for Health Services in Juvenile Confinement Facilities published in 1984 by the National Commission on Correctional Health Care. These standards were reviewed in the preparation of this report. Human Rights Watch considers the ACA standards to be the most comprehensive; they are, therefore, the only standards referred to in the report.
26 42 USC 1997.
27 20 USC 1401.
28 Interview with Mark Soler, President, Youth Law Center, September 8, 1995.
29 Children serving a juvenile life sentence in Louisiana may continue to be held in juvenile facilities between the ages of eighteen and twenty.
30 Since our visit this facility has changed its name to the Jetson Correctional Center for Youth. For purposes of this report, the name of the facility at the time of Human Rights Watch's investigation will be retained.
31 Interview with Mrs. Perla Steele, Director of Diagnostic Services, who administers the operations of JRDC, on March 16, 1995.
32 Interview with Secretary Richard Stalder of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, on May 4, 1995.
33 This information was provided to Human Rights Watch in a letter dated August 25, 1995, from George White, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Youth Development, Department of Public Safety and Corrections.
34 Human Rights Watch was not able to obtain this statistical information from TCCY.
35 Hayes Williams, et al v. John McKeithen, et al, December 27, 1984, USDC, Middle District of Louisiana, Civil Action No. 71-98-B.
36 Progress Report by Superintendent Jerry Goodwin to Secretary Richard Stalder, dated March 8, 1995.
37 In Pena v. New York State Division for Youth, 419 F. Supp. 203 (S.D.N.Y. 1976), at pp. 203-206, the court said that there was an "absolute proscription against punishment and retribution as permissible objectives" in the juvenile justice system. For other references to this issue see also: D.B. Tewksbury, 545 F. Supp. 896 (D.Or. 1982); Morgan v. Sproat, 432 F. Supp. 1130 (S.D. Miss. 1977); and Burrell, Legal Issues Relating to Conditions of Confinement for Detained Children, at p. 26.
38 The term EBR-LTI will be used throughout the report, unless otherwise indicated in the text, to include the long term campus and JRDC.
39 Interview with Reginald Grace, Assistant Secretary to the Secretary of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, March 16, 1995.
40 Convention on the Rights of the Child, article 28; U.N. Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty, Rule 38.
41 To preserve the anonymity of the children, the initials used to identify a child bear no relation to the actual initials or name of the child.
42 Interview with Secretary Richard Stalder of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, May 4, 1995.
43 The details of the April 19, 1995, disturbance at TCCY are drawn from a report dated April 20, 1995 prepared by Superintendent Goodwin of TCCY and sent to the Deputy Secretary of the DPSC.
44 ACA, Standards for Juvenile Training Schools, Section C, 3-JTS-2C-01; U.N. Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty, Rule 33; U.N. Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, Rule 9.
45 "We found that the percentage of juveniles in dormitories is positively associated with juvenile-on-juvenile injury and the use of short-term confinement. Juveniles in dormitories injure other juveniles more often, and staff in facilites with dormitories more frequently rely on short-term isolation to control juvenile behavior. The finding with respect to juvenile-on-juvenile injury is consistent with prior research that shows that increased social density has more negative effects on juveniles' behavior than reduced space does.": OJJDP, Conditions of Confinement: Juvenile Detention and Corrections Facilities (1994), at p. 68. Ernest Thomas, Detention Home Supervisor at Rivarde Memorial Home in Jefferson Parish told Human Rights Watch that, "dorms create sexual harassment and violence...it is the intimidation of the setting."
46 Hayes Williams, et al v. John McKeithen, et al, Annual Reports of Lousiana Training Institutes to the United States District Court, Middle District of Louisiana, July 1995.
47 Interview with Superintendent Robert Dunavant, May 3, 1995.
48 U.N. Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty, Rules 8, 30 and 87; U.N. Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice, Rule 26.
49 U.N. Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice.
50 Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 99 S. Ct. 1861 (1979).
51 Pena v. New York Division for Youth, 419 F. Supp. 203 (S.D.N.Y. 1976); Thomas v. Mears, 474 F. Supp. 908 (E.D. Ark. 1979); and Burrell, Legal Issues Relating to Conditions of Confinement for Detained Children, at p. 29.
52 Throughout the report the terms isolation and lockdown will be used interchangeably. Both refer to the same thing, but 'lockdown' is the term commonly used in Louisiana.
53 Interview with Superintendent Elijah Lewis at the East Baton Rouge-LTI, March 16, 1995; interview with Superintendent Robert Dunavant at the Monroe-LTI, May 3, 1995.
54 Ninety new beds have been have been built since HRW visited, all of which are single cell housing. It is not clear whether they are intended for administration segregation. HRW was told that they were reserved for the most aggressive children at the facility.
55 U.N. Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty, Rule 24; Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, Rule 35.
56 For example, the violation of "defiance" is defined in part in the following manner: "No offender shall threaten an employee in any manner, including threatening with legal redress during a confrontation situation (this does not mean telling an employee of planned legal redress outside a confrontation situation and does not mean the actual composition or filing of a writ or suit)." Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Disciplinary Rules and Procedures for Juvenile Offenders, 1st ed., 1993, Section IV.2.
57 Interview with Secretary Richard Stalder, May 4, 1995.
58 CRC, Article 37(a): "No child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment..."
59 Beijing Rules, Rule 17.3: "Juveniles shall not be subject to corporal punishment." U.N. Rules, Rule 64: "Instruments of restraint and force can only be used in exceptional cases, where all other control methods have been exhausted and failed, and only as explicitly authorized and specified by law and regulation. They should not cause humiliation or degradation, and should be used restrictively and only for the shortest possible period of time."
60 Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Standard Operation Procedure No. 03-01-031, as revised March 02, 1994.
61 The terms "guard," "correctional officer" and "security staff" refer to the same position at the facilities. The guards are strictly for security purposes. The counselors referred to by the children provide guidance and counseling to the children and do not have primary responsibility for security. The allegations of abuse primarily involved members of the security staff.
62 Interview with Secretary Richard Stalder of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, May 4, 1995.
63 The quotes which appear in this report are verbatim records of what the children said to HRW, with the addition of words necessary for grammatical purposes. Where an additional word seemed to be required for clarity for the reader it is indicated by square brackets.
64 Ms. Gagneaux is employed by the DPSC.
65 The source of these statistics is the DPSC form 7, under department regulation 30-1, Summary of ARPS by Subject Code, as submitted by each of the juvenile institutions on a monthly basis. This information was provided to us by the DPSC.
66 Because of the complexity of the ARP requirements, many children may complain in an incorrect manner and they are, therefore, ignored.
67 Letter from Superintendent Elijah Lewis to Secretary Richard Stalder of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, August 22, 1995.
68 The secretary of the DPSC supplied Human Rights Watch with the notification to him by Superintendent Lewis of EBR-LTI of the correctional officer's emergency suspension. Letter to HRW, June 13, 1995.
69 Following Human Rights Watch's visit the Department of Public Safety and Corrections sent us information it had gathered from each of the institutions certifying that the food allowances met U.S.D.A., American Dietetic Association and Department of Education dietary allowance requirements. Letters from the Department of Public Safety and Corrections to Human Rights Watch, dated May 24, 1995 and September 1, 1995.
70 Interview with Superintendent Robert Dunavant, May 3, 1995.
71 This problem does not occur for children in the MCRC program at EBR-LTI, because the development of an aftercare program is part of the overall MCRC program.