Saudi Arabia's human rights record remained poor and there were no discernible improvements in 2001. The government took no steps to ease restrictions in the key areas of freedom of association and expression, women's rights, and religious freedom, or move toward a more open and tolerant society. The continued absence of institutions independent of the government, such as political parties and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), allowed the ruling royal family to maintain its historic franchise on power, beyond public reproach and accountability. A May 24 royal decree increased the members of the all-male Consultative Council from ninety to 120, although the appointed body remained toothless with respect to any substantive oversight of the executive branch of government. Workers, including millions of foreigners, were not permitted to form trade unions, strike, or engage in collective bargaining, and household servants--numbering an estimated one million foreigners--continued to be excluded from protection under the labor law. The kingdom also remained off-limits to international human rights organizations, and no one inside the country dared to break the long-standing taboo on openly scrutinizing and reporting human rights abuses.
On October 1, the Council of Ministers approved a 225-article penal code, scheduled to come into force ninety days after its publication in the official gazette. The government said that the code prohibited "coercion, or infliction of physical or moral harm on those arrested," granted criminal suspects "the right to receive legal assistance from a lawyer," and prohibited "detention or imprisonment except in jails or special secure units, and then only on the issuance of a court order." The law also set a five-day limit on detention by criminal investigators, specifying that detainees "shall be released if there is no justification or if there is not enough evidence," although in cases of "serious crimes" the interior minister also had the right to detain suspects. The council also approved on October 1 a forty-three-article law regulating the legal profession.
The practical effect of these new laws, once in force, remained to be seen. Cases during the year involving detained foreign nationals continued to illustrate fundamental flaws in the Saudi judicial system that facilitate human rights violations, including prolonged incommunicado detention, inadequate safeguards against torture and ill treatment of prisoners during interrogation, denial of access to lawyers, and the lack of transparency of legal proceedings. Several foreign governments complained that Saudi authorities had not provided timely notification of the arrest of their nationals and in some cases had denied consular officials access to detainees for long periods. Twice during the year authorities used televised "confessions" to brand suspects guilty of violent activities before they were charged or tried, a practice at odds with the government's affirmation in 2000 that "in the Islamic shariah, presumption of innocence is the fundamental principle in criminal proceedings."
One person was killed and others injured in a series of bombing attacks in Riyadh and Khobar between November 2000 and March 2001, which the authorities said were a consequence of turf wars among expatriates involved in the illegal but highly lucrative alcohol trade. (See below.) Two other attacks followed in Khobar: on May 2, a U.S. citizen was seriously injured, and on October 6, a U.S. citizen and another victim who was not identified were killed and four foreigners wounded. Authorities announced on November 14 that the second person killed was a Palestinian dentist who worked in Riyadh, whom they alleged was the perpetrator of the bombing.
Three foreign residents of Saudi Arabia--Alexander Mitchell, British; William Sampson, Canadian; and Raaf Schifer, Belgian--appeared on Saudi state television on February 4, "confessing" to two separate car bombings in Riyadh that killed one Briton and injured others in November 2000. The videotaped statements were made after the detainees had been held incommunicado for over a month without their respective consulates being informed and were aired before completion of the criminal investigation or formal charging. According to the Canadian government, the Saudi interior minister confirmed on February 13 that Sampson had not been permitted to consult with a lawyer during the investigation stage of the proceedings. By November, the three men continued to be held in solitary confinement and a trial was several months away, according to one of their lawyers.
The videotaped "confessions" of three British citizens, who admitted involvement in three bombings between December 2000 and March 2001, were shown on Saudi television on August 13. James Lee, James Cottle, and Les Walker said they had "received orders" to carry out attacks in Riyadh on January 10 and March 15, and in Khobar on December 15. The Khobar bombing injured one person; the March explosion injured two. As was the case during the February "confessions," the suspects did not disclose any motives for their actions, nor who had ordered the violence. The British government said it was informed by Saudi authorities about the "confessions" the day before the broadcast but was not told of the charges or a trial date. These men were also held in solitary confinement, and as of early November a trial was not expected for several months.
Two accused Chechen airplane hijackers, one of them a minor, were reportedly brought to trial in September but denied legal representation. On September 5, Okaz newspaper quoted Judge Sheikh Saleh bin Muhamed al-Luhaidan, chairman of the Supreme Judicial Council and a member of the Senior Council of Ulema (religious scholars), as saying: "A case such as this requires no defense lawyer because the hijacking occurred and the hijackers are known and have confessed their crimes." The same day the Russian Foreign Ministry said that it had not received "official confirmation" of the trial nor a response from Saudi authorities to its request for the extradition of the two Chechens, named as Deni Magomerzayev, nineteen, and Eriskhan Arsayev, sixteen. The teenagers were apprehended following the abortive hijacking of a Russian passenger plane flying from Moscow to Istanbul on March 16. The aircraft was forced to land in Medina; three people were killed, including the third alleged hijacker, when Saudi forces stormed the plane to release the passengers and crew.
Trials continued to be conducted behind closed doors. A Riyadh court on May 26 sentenced four British citizens to flogging and prison terms for illegal alcohol trading, but British authorities said they were not notified until May 31. The court sentenced Kelvin Hawkins to two and a half years of imprisonment and five hundred lashes, while Paul Moss, David Mornin, and Ken Hartley received lesser terms and punishment of three hundred to five hundred lashes each.
Relations between the government and the minority Ismaili Shiite community remained tense in the wake of violent clashes with security forces that erupted in Najran province in April 2000 and resulted in scores of arrests. In April 2001, twelve Ismailis signed a petition to Crown Prince Abdullah, complaining about official discrimination, unfair trials, and prolonged imprisonment, and an Ismaili delegation delivered the petition and other documents to the palace in Jeddah on April 29. The next day, a security official arrived in a special bus, which the delegation understood to mean that the governor wished to see them. Instead, at least six members of the delegation were taken to security headquarters in Jeddah and imprisoned there; as of this writing, in November, it was unclear whether they were still being held.
Death sentences by beheading were carried out throughout the year, mostly for murder, rape, or drug-trafficking. By mid-November, at least seventy-five Saudis and foreigners had been executed, according to Reuters. Foreign governments rarely raised fair-trial concerns publicly when their nationals were sentenced to execution. However, a sharp rise in the number of Indians beheaded on drug-related offenses (from one in 1998 to twenty-four in 2000, according to the Indian ambassador to Saudi Arabia) prompted some Indian officials to press for an Indian government investigation of the duping of Indian migrant workers, mainly from the state of Kerala, by drug dealers posing as job recruiters.
The government's highly publicized ratification in 2000 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women prompted no initiatives to give Saudi women equal rights with men. Women were not permitted identity cards in their own name, only "family cards" in the name of their husband or father, did not enjoy freedom of movement, were not permitted to drive, and lacked equal rights with men with respect to the nationality of their children, among other discriminatory practices. On April 26, Prince Nayef stated that the government would not lift the ban on women driving: "It is not possible, and there are no studies on the subject at all."
The Saudi public gained access to the Internet in 1999 and the number of users reached an estimated 500,000 in 2001. The government continued to block what official censors viewed as objectionable web sites, ranging from pornography to politics. Ibrahim al-Fareeh, Internet supervisor at King Abdul Aziz Center for Science and Technology (KACST), which controlled access to the Internet, told the Associated Press in April that KACST was about to launch a new campaign, with advanced equipment, to block a further 200,000 sites, raising to 400,000 the number of sites off-limits to Saudi users
Some seven million foreigners worked in the kingdom, many of them from India, Egypt, Indonesia, Pakistan, the Philippines, and Bangladesh. Conditions were particularly difficult for the estimated one million women who were employed as domestic workers, a job category not covered by the labor law. Over 19,000 women domestics fled from their employers in 2000, a Labor Ministry official acknowledged in April, citing mistreatment, nonpayment of wages, and other grievances. The Philippines ambassador told his government that many Filipino workers in Saudi Arabia were "subjected to poor living conditions, salary underpayment, insufficient food, inhuman working conditions, and long hours of work without rest or day off," Business World (Manila) reported on March 2. He said Saudi employers illegally "sold" Filipino workers to new sponsors for 2,000 riyals (U.S. $533) when employment contracts expired or the workers were no longer needed, although Saudi authorities had banned such transfers of sponsorship.
Some 370,000 Indonesians were employed in the kingdom, most of them reportedly women domestic workers. In July, the Indonesian government temporarily suspended sending workers to Saudi Arabia pending a formal memorandum of understanding (MoU) under which Saudi authorities agreed to afford greater legal protection to Indonesian migrant workers. Under the MoU, signed in September, the Saudi embassy in Jakarta was to provide the Indonesian Labor Ministry "a weekly list of laborers granted visas and the names of Indonesian recruitment offices handling the process." Also, all visa applications were to be processed through certified labor recruitment offices in both countries, and efforts made to prevent labor recruiters "from manipulating costs, official papers, medical reports and sending unqualified manpower."
The uncertain future of the remaining 5,200 Iraqi refugees in the Rafha desert camp near the Saudi-Iraq border received publicity when dozens of refugees began a hunger strike on June 23 to press demands for resettlement in third countries. Those at Rafha were the last of some 33,000 Iraqi refugees who had been held at the camp since the end of the Gulf war in 1991, of whom 25,000 were resettled in Europe, North America, and Australia, while some 3,000 voluntarily returned to Iraq. The suspension of resettlement programs for these refugees in 1997 left those who remained at the camp no option other than repatriation to Iraq, but the majority of them did not want to return there, according to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The government reportedly more than tripled the grant it provided to returnees to 10,000 riyals (U.S. $2,666), but apparently without effect. In July, the government said the Iraqi refugees were "treated well," and denied "allegations of rioting, detention of refugees, or incidents of beating, insults or torture." It added that although the Defense Ministry supervised the camp, it was "UNHCR, not the Kingdom, that [was] in charge of resettlement demands by the remaining 5,000 refugees."
Saudi Arabia remained one of the region's embarrassing wastelands with respect to an openly functioning network of independent human rights lawyers, other activists, and institutions. As a result, victims of abuse and their supporters were left isolated and vulnerable, and the timely documentation of rights violations was exceedingly difficult. International human rights organizations were not granted access during the year, and foreign journalists based in the country rarely investigated and reported allegations of abuse.
In March, a seven-member delegation from the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (see below) visited Saudi Arabia and interviewed senior government officials who, it reported, "expressed a desire to continue dialogue with the U.S. government on religious freedom issues."
Table of Contents
More on Saudi Arabia
Middle East & North Africa