Human Rights Developments
In 1998 political instability and infighting among partners in the governing coalition slowed the pace of democratic and economic reform and inhibited progress on human rights in Romania. Romanias non-communist President, Emil Constantinescu, elected in 1996 in the first truly democratic presidential election since the overthrow of the dictator Nicolae Ceaucescu in 1989,forged a coalition government headed by Victor Ciorbea of the National Peasants/Christian Democratic Party. As a result of the Democratic Partys threat to withdraw from the coalition, and in order to avoid early elections, Prime Minister Ciorbea resigned on March 30, 1998, and was replaced by Radu Vasile, secretary general of the National Peasants Party, on April 2. In late September, the Union of Democratic Magyars (UDMR) of Romania also threatened to withdraw from the coalition government in protest against the governments refusal to establish a Hungarian-language university, a longstanding demand of the Hungarian minority. The UDMR and the government reached a compromise: a multicultural university with instruction in Romanian, Hungarian, and German is to be established, and the UDMR will remain in government.
Despite the governments promises and pressure from NGOs and the international community, Vasiles shaky coalition governmentcomposed of numerous political parties with conflicting agendasmade no noticeable progress in resolving long-entrenched human rights problems such as discrimination and other ill-treatment directed at ethnic and sexual minorities. In addition, the government prosecuted critical journalists under its libel statutes, and there continued to be nearly complete impunity for police brutality, especially when the victims were unpopular minorities.
On June 25, the Chamber of Deputies voted against a government-sponsored amendment to the penal code that would have decriminalized consensual homosexual acts. Under article 200 of the penal code, consensual homosexual acts that are committed in public or which cause a public scandal may be punished with imprisonment of one to five years. Article 200 also punishes conduct that incit[es] or encourag[es] . . . sexual relations between persons of the same sex, as well as propaganda or association or any other act of proselytism committed in the same scope, . . . by imprisonment of one to five years. Expressions of homosexual identity or solidarity, as well as the establishment of gay and lesbian organizations and the dissemination of information are also punishable under this law.
The Chamber of Deputies also failed to amend the criminal code provision prohibiting defamation of the nation and/or state authorities. During 1998, these provisions were used to punish journalists who exposed corruption among public officials. On March 13, three journalists from the Buzau newspaper Opinia received one year in prison for printing accusations that a former prosecutors mother rented her house for use by those involved in an illegal pyramid scheme. In Bistrita on May 25, Cornel Sabou, editor-in-chief of Trans-Press agency, received a sentence of ten months for publishing protests against a judge accused of using his influence for personal pecuniary gain. On July 23, a court in Iasi sentenced Ovidiu Scultelnicu and Dragos Stangu to one year of imprisonment, a fine of 1.5 billion lei (U.S.$175,000), and deprivation of some civil rights, as well as the right to practice journalism for twelve months, for criticizing police colonel Petru Susanus policing methods and questioning the origin of his personal fortune. On August 29, in Botosani, Florentin Florescu, and Radu Burlacu were fined 100 million lei ($11,250) for reporting a local politicians efforts to influence the magistrates assigned to his sons trial. Scultelnicu, Stangu, Florescu, and Burlacu all worked for Monitorul , a regional independent daily operating in northeastern Romania.
The Romanian Helsinki Committee (RHC) also received and investigated numerous reports from individuals who claimed to have been tortured or abused by the police. The RHC also reports numerous instances of the unlawful use of firearms by police. The military prosecutor has jurisdiction over such complaints, but was reluctant to indict police officers for such abuses. Romanian law provides no other remedy for victims of police abuse. Roma are disproportionately the victims of police misconduct. Conditions in detention facilities continued to fall well below international standards in 1998.
Women also faced police harassment and discrimination in Romania. In May, police in Braila summoned women suspected of traveling to Turkey to engage in sex work to the police station and threatened them with arrest and public exposure of their activities in Turkey if they refused to surrender their passports. Police then confiscated their passports, preventing the women from leaving the country. On a positive note, the Romanian parliament adopted a law on May 29 defining and punishing sexual harassment in the workplace and prohibiting discrimination against married or pregnant women in employment.
Republic of Belarus
Bosnia and Hercegovina
The Russian Federation
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
Asylum Policy in Western Europe
BACK TO TOP
Copyright © 1999
Human RIghts Watch