|
Contribute to Human Rights Watch
|
HOME | SITEMAP | SEARCH | CONTACT | REPORTS | PRESS ARCHIVES |
| FREE Join the HRW Mailing List |
|
Letter to His Excellency M. Moctar Ouane |
|
September 20, 2000
His Excellency M. Moctar Ouane Dear Ambassador Ouane, Human Rights Watch is writing to you concerning the humanitarian crisis in Iraq, a crisis which derives in considerable measure from the comprehensive economic sanctions imposed by the Security Council. The most recent report of the Secretary-General to the Council on the operation of the oil-for-food program (S/2000/857) notes some recent improvements, but also stresses the continuing emergency situation in the public health area.
While the factors contributing to such a complex emergency situation cannot be reduced to a single cause, the report frequently cites the problem of protracted holds by the Security Council's sanctions committee (the "661 committee") on key items. Regarding the "infrastructural degradation" evident in the water and sanitation sector, for instance, the report states that "in the absence of key complementary items currently on hold and adequate maintenance, spare parts and staffing, the decay rate of the entire system is accelerating." Concerning the electricity sector, the capacity and reliability of which is crucial to water treatment, refrigeration, and public health generally, the report states that the governorates outside of the capital continue to experience outages of between twelve and eighteen hours a day. A fire this August in the Mussaiyab power station increased these daily outages to up to twenty hours in some governorates. "The entire electricity grid is in a precarious state and is in imminent danger of collapsing altogether should another incident of this type occur," the report states. Twenty-five percent of the electricity sector contracts submitted to the 661 committee, the Secretary-General writes, were on hold. The report states that there have been some improvements in the health sector but notes the "continuing hold placed on equipment for a computerized stock management system" and characterizes the overall provision of health care and services as one of "steep decline." In its weekly report for the period ending September 15, the Office of the Iraq Programme (OIP) stated that the total value of contracts on hold in all sectors was $1.97 billion. Many are on what the Secretary-General termed "complementary items"--in other words, holds that often make it impossible to install or operate "central items" already approved and delivered. The negative humanitarian impact of the holds is thus greater than the number of contracts or dollar amounts suggest. In our letter to the Security Council of January 4, 2000, Human Rights Watch urged the Council to instruct the 661 committee to introduce greater transparency into its deliberations by making available information concerning its decisions and explanations for rejections and holds placed on contract applications. We regret that so far as we are aware no such instruction has been issued, and we have seen no greater transparency in the committee's operations. Human Rights Watch also urged the Council to establish an independent framework and mechanism for monitoring the humanitarian impact of sanctions imposed under its authority. We were encouraged that in June the Council, in resolution 1302 (2000) extending the operation of the oil-for-food program, asked the Secretary-General to appoint a group of independent experts to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the humanitarian situation in Iraq. We have written separately to the government of Iraq strongly objecting to its refusal to cooperate with this mission, as well as its refusal to discuss modalities of a "cash component" that would allow the use of some of Iraq's oil revenues to pay for local products and services (copy of letter to the government of Iraq attached). We want to stress, however, that this regrettable absence of cooperation by the government does not diminish the obligation of the Council to monitor the humanitarian impact of the sanctions on Iraqi society. Many sectoral studies by U.N. agencies operating in the country are available, as are the regular reports of the U.N. observation teams and the recent and forthcoming reports to the Secretary-General of experts looking at the sectors of food and agriculture, electricity, and water and sanitation. The findings and recommendations in these reports should form the basis for Security Council action towards meeting serious humanitarian needs. The recently issued Assessment of the Food and Nutrition Situation technical report by the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), for instance, notes that while existing food rations, combined with market food purchases, have "halted further deterioration in the nutritional situation, they have not by themselves been able to reverse this trend." One factor is that the ration diet is lacking in vegetables, fruit and animal products, including dairy, which are too costly for many families in the markets. The FAO report also notes that "malnutrition is often caused by factors other than those related to food." In particular, poor water supply and sanitation lead to frequent and repeated infections among children. The report concludes that acute malnutrition among children under five has decreased only slightly from the twelve percent recorded in 1995, and that at least 800,000 children under five are chronically malnourished. The deterioration of Iraq's civilian infrastructure in areas vital to public health remains one of the key impediments to addressing the continuing humanitarian emergency in the country. The other is the impoverishment of the population, which goes to the heart of the sanctions strategy. The Secretary-General's report notes, for instance, that locally produced fruits, vegetables, poultry, eggs, meat, and dairy products are increasingly available in Iraqi markets. "Unfortunately," he writes, "most Iraqis do not have the necessary purchasing power to buy these foods." The monthly food ration represents the largest proportion of most household incomes, and "seventy percent of families barter or sell items in the food basket to obtain other essential goods." The Secretary-General's latest report underscores the disturbing fact that the impact of the sanctions, notwithstanding the achievements of the oil-for-food program, continues to be felt mainly by ordinary Iraqis. In the light of this, Human Rights Watch is compelled to call your attention once again to the key recommendation we made to you in our January letter: to restructure the sanctions regime in order to minimize its impact on the civilian population, by permitting the unrestricted import of civilian goods and investments in the civilian economy. We continue to believe that prohibitions must remain on imports of a military nature, and that the government is likely to use its greater access to foreign exchange for prohibited purposes. We believe that there is no way to foreclose that possibility entirely. Indeed, under present arrangements, goods Iraq now imports using foreign exchange from smuggling and other sources enter the country unrestricted and uninspected. Making all imported goods liable to international inspection at Iraqi ports of entry, if undertaken with the same sense of purpose that the international community displayed in monitoring and enforcing the embargo on Yugoslavia in the 1992 - 1995 period, could go a very long way toward preventing Iraqi government acquisition of military and dual-use commodities, especially if this is coupled with continued monitoring of military industries and activities inside the country. Human Rights Watch strongly urges the Council once again to address in a more satisfactory way the humanitarian consequences of the sanctions it has authorized in Iraq, and to take into account the most basic humanitarian principles when applying coercive measures that affect the well-being of the civilian population. We look forward to an opportunity to discuss these recommendations with you and with the representatives of other Council member states.
Sincerely, cc: Heads of permanent missions of Member States of the U.N. Security Council
|
| HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | HOME | SITEMAP | SEARCH | CONTACT | REPORTS | PRESS ARCHIVES |