Your Excellency:
Human Rights Watch is deeply concerned about the widespread recourse that Palestinian courts have recently had to the death penalty. So far in 2008, Palestinian Authority courts have sentenced 11 people to death, including a defendant who was a child at the time of the alleged offense.
We strongly urge to use your authority, which extends to both cases heard in Gaza and the West bank, to commute these sentences when they come to your office Human Rights Watch opposes the use of the death penalty in all cases as a violation of the right to life and because of the possibility that individuals wrongly convicted may be executed. We also regard it as a cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment.
Human Rights Watch is especially concerned about the case of Sa'id Jameel Zuhod, who was a child at the time of his alleged offense. International human rights law and customary law absolutely prohibit the death penalty for all crimes committed by persons under age 18 at the time of the offense.
Zuhod was 17 years old in September 2003 when, with three adults, Ihab Diab Abu al-‘Amrain, Rami Sa'id Juha, and ‘Abdul Fattah Mohammed Sammour, he allegedly participated in the rape and murder of a child. In recognition of his young age, the Dsi District Court of Gaza on April 13, 2004, sentenced Zuhod to life imprisonment, although it sentenced his co-defendants to death.
However, on June 14, 2005, the Court of Appeals rejected the lower court's decision, re-sentencing Zuhod to death along with his co-defendants. The Gaza Court of Cassation upheld all four death sentences on October 29, 2008, despite an appeal by Zuhod's lawyer that as a juvenile he should receive a reduced sentence.
The Palestinian Authority has never before executed a person for a crime committed as a child. It would be a grave error to do so now, when the rest of the world is steadily moving toward universal compliance with the absolute prohibition against the juvenile death penalty. Since January 2005, only five governments in the world-Iran, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Pakistan, and Yemen-have executed juvenile offenders, and only Iran has executed a juvenile offender since August 2007.
Your Excellency, the world is moving toward abolition of the death penalty, as reflected in the UN General Assembly's December 8, 2007 resolution calling for a global moratorium on all executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty.
While international law does not ban outright the death penalty for persons over 18 at the time of the offense for all states, it does put stringent restrictions on its use, and encourages those states that still retain the death penalty to take the necessary steps to abolish it.
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) - the most widely accepted international standard on the use of the death penalty - states that "sentence of death shall not be imposed for crimes committed by persons below eighteen years". Signatories of the covenant also agree that only the most serious crimes be subject to the death penalty. According to the ICCPR, states may impose the death penalty only if courts rigorously adhere to the rules of due process set forth in the Covenant, and provided that the defendant had the right to appeal the court's decision.
The Palestinian Authority is not a sovereign state that can sign and ratify international human rights treaties, but it has repeatedly committed itself to respect international human rights law. According to article 10 of the Basic Law, the Palestinian National Authority "shall work without delay to become a party to regional and international declarations and covenants that protect human rights." The Palestinian Authority has also committed itself in the Oslo accords to exercise its power and responsibilities "with due regard to internationally accepted norms of human rights and the rule of law."
The Palestinian judicial system contravenes these standards in several ways: First, the number of offenses for which the death sentence may be imposed is extremely broad, and inconsistent with the requirement that this punishment be restricted to the most grievous crimes. The Palestinian Penal Code allows an ordinary court in the West Bank to impose the death penalty for seventeen separate offenses; in the Gaza Strip, fifteen offenses are subject to the death penalty.
We are particularly disturbed by the Palestinian Authority's recourse to the death penalty by state security and military courts, contradicting a commitment made by your office on June 22, 2005, to refer all death penalty cases to civilian courts. Military and state security courts impose the death penalty, pursuant to the PLO Revolutionary Penal Code of 1979. This code, which the Palestinian Legislative Council has never ratified, allows the death penalty for forty-two separate offenses.
Trials in these courts deny defendants protections afforded by elementary rules of due process. Defendants have no meaningful opportunity to defend themselves, and there is no independent appeal of sentences issued by these courts. In military courts, the same judges that issue the initial ruling also rule on the appeal. Thereafter only the president of the Palestinian Authority has the power to alter the sentence.
Palestinian military courts have sentenced seven people to death so far this year:
- l The high military court in Gaza sentenced Yasser Sa'id Zanoun, age 41, to death on January 24, 2008, for murdering fellow-policeman Ismail Mashwahi in June 2007. On July 20 the court also sentenced Eyad Ahmed Sukkar, age 35, to death for what judges said were "hostile activities against Palestinian revolutionists and military operations of the Palestinian revolution."
- l The high military court in Jenin sentenced Tha'er Mahmoud Ramailat, age 23, to death on April 6, 2008 for murdering ‘Alaa' ‘Aayesh Mubarak, 20, a colleague and member of the Palestinian police .The same court sentenced Wa'el Sa'id Sa'ed, age 27, and Imad Muhammad Sa'id Sa'id, (in absentia) age 44, to death "treason and conspiracy," by acting as an informer for Israeli authorities on July 15 2008.
- l The high military court in Hebron sentenced ‘Imad Mahmoud Sa'id, age 25, to death on April 26, for "treason and collaboration" by providing information to Israeli forces "that led to the deaths of four Palestinian martyrs."
- l The high military court in Bethlehem sentenced Ayman Ahmed 'Awwad Daghamgha, age 24, a member of the Palestinian General Intelligence Service, to death by firing squad on November 12, 2008, for "treason and collaborating with Israel."
These military court trials do not meet international fair trial standards. For example, in the murder case of Tha'er Mahmoud Husni Rmailat, the High Military Court hearing lasted only one day. According to the Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR) which monitored the trial, the authorities gave Rmailat only one day's notice before the trial began and denied his lawyer's request for a psychological assessment. PCHR also states his lawyer had only one hour to prepare Rmailat's defense after the military prosecutor concluded his argument.
Imad Mahmoud Sa'ed Sa'ed's trial, according to PCHR monitors, similarly lasted only one day.
We therefore urge Your Excellency to commute these sentences, announce a moratorium on all executions, and work with the Palestinian Legislative Council to pass and implement legislation to ensure the ultimate elimination of the death penalty in Palestinian law. We also urge to you recommit yourself to your undertaking of June 2005 to ensure that all death penalty cases heard before military and state security courts be re-tried in civilian courts.
Sincerely,
Sarah Leah Whitson Lois Whitman
Executive Director Executive Director
Middle East and North Africa Division Children's Rights Division
cc:
Prime Minister Dr. Salam Fayyad
The Prime Minister's office
Ramallah
Minister of Justice Dr. Ali Khashaan
Ministry of Justice
