25 juillet 2008

Law and Reality

Progress in Judicial Reform in Rwanda

I. Summary
II. Methodology
III. Recommendations
To the Rwandan government
To the judicial system..
To the Rwandan legislature
To donors
IV. Background
V. Justice for the Genocide
Practical Problems: Turning on the Lights
Identifying and Prosecuting Perpetrators: the Issue of Scale
The Legal Basis for Prosecution
Prosecution in Conventional Courts
Gacaca: Popular or Political Justice?
"Justice is a Political Problem"
Reclassification by Administrative Decision
VI. Creating a Modern Professional Judicial System..
Fewer Courts
Administrative Autonomy
More Highly Trained Personnel
Increased Efficiency
Greater Speed for Justice-but not for Genocide Cases
Improved Protection for Human Rights
VII. "Divisionism" and "Genocide Ideology"
Imprecise Laws
One Truth
The Campaign against "Divisionism" and "Genocide Ideology"
Prosecutions of "Divisionism" and "Genocide Ideology"
The New Law on "Genocide Ideology"
VIII. Independence of the Judiciary
Law and Reality
Limits on Administrative Autonomy
Misuse of Prosecutorial Power
Interference in Judicial Cases
Political Cases
Genocide cases
Other Cases
Consequences of Trying to Remain Independent
Lack of Respect for Judicial Orders
IX. Challenges to Fair Trial Standards
The Presumption of Innocence
The Right to Present Witnesses
The Right to Legal Counsel
The Right to Humane conditions of Detention and Freedom from Torture
Protection from Double Jeopardy
Monitoring Trials
X. Equal Access to Justice: Prosecuting Crimes by RPA Soldiers
Interface with Other Judicial Systems
XI. Future Plans for Justice
XII. International Support
XIII. Acknowledgments100
XIV. Annex 1 - Number of Genocide Cases Judged101
XV. Annex 2 - Analysis of RPA prosecutions by the Rwandan government for crimes committed in the year 1994   103