Possession versus Sales
Relatively few arrests made in the war on drugs involve drug importers, manufacturers, major dealers, or even small dealers. As shown in Table 5 and reflected graphically in Figure 3, from 1999 through 2007, 80 percent or more of all drug arrests were for possession rather than sales.[15] Between 1980 and the present, sales arrests have never represented more than 36 percent of all drug arrests. Indeed, the proportion of drug arrests for possession has been increasing.[16] It is worth noting that marijuana possession accounts for a large proportion of all drug arrests: in the years 2000 through 2007, marijuana possession arrests constituted between 37.7 percent and 42.1 percent of all drug arrests.[17]
Possession arrests account for the preponderance of black as well as white drug arrests. As shown in Table 6, 76 percent of black drug arrests and 85 percent of white drug arrests in 2006 were for possession. From the 2006 state by state data provided to us by the UCR Program we were able to calculate the proportion of black and white drug arrests that were for sales or possession. Among black drug arrestees, the proportion who were arrested for possession varied among the states from a low of 33 percent to a high of 96 percent. The percentage of white drug arrestees arrested for possession ranged from a low of 50 percent to a high of 93 percent.
Table 5: US Arrests for Drug Possession and Sales, 1980-2007
|
Year |
Percent for Possession |
Percent for Sales |
|
1980 |
76% |
24% |
|
1981 |
78% |
22% |
|
1982 |
79% |
21% |
|
1983 |
77% |
23% |
|
1984 |
77% |
23% |
|
1985 |
76% |
24% |
|
1986 |
74% |
26% |
|
1987 |
74% |
26% |
|
1988 |
72% |
28% |
|
1989 |
68% |
32% |
|
1990 |
68% |
32% |
|
1991 |
64% |
36% |
|
1992 |
69% |
31% |
|
1993 |
70% |
30% |
|
1994 |
73% |
27% |
|
1995 |
75% |
25% |
|
1996 |
75% |
25% |
|
1997 |
79% |
21% |
|
1998 |
79% |
21% |
|
1999 |
80% |
20% |
|
2000 |
81% |
19% |
|
2001 |
81% |
19% |
|
2002 |
80% |
20% |
|
2003 |
81% |
19% |
|
2004 |
81% |
19% |
|
2005 |
82% |
18% |
|
2006 |
82% |
18% |
|
2007 |
83% |
17% |
Table 6: State Adult Drug Arrests by Offense and Race, 2006*
|
State |
Sales as Percent of White Drug Arrests |
Possession as Percent of White Drug Arrests |
Sales as Percent of Black Drug Arrests |
Possession as Percent of Black Drug Arrests |
|
Alabama |
7% |
93% |
6% |
94% |
|
Alaska |
30% |
70% |
44% |
56% |
|
Arizona |
13% |
87% |
16% |
84% |
|
Arkansas |
16% |
84% |
19% |
81% |
|
California |
13% |
87% |
25% |
75% |
|
Colorado |
11% |
89% |
56% |
44% |
|
Connecticut |
14% |
86% |
55% |
45% |
|
Delaware |
28% |
72% |
45% |
55% |
|
District of Columbia |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|
Florida |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|
Georgia |
23% |
77% |
22% |
78% |
|
Hawaii |
22% |
78% |
20% |
80% |
|
Idaho |
12% |
88% |
55% |
45% |
|
Illinois |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|
Indiana |
19% |
81% |
26% |
74% |
|
Iowa |
10% |
90% |
11% |
90% |
|
Kansas |
17% |
83% |
18% |
82% |
|
Kentucky |
11% |
89% |
20% |
80% |
|
Louisiana |
15% |
85% |
22% |
78% |
|
Maine |
21% |
79% |
42% |
58% |
|
Maryland |
15% |
85% |
27% |
73% |
|
Massachusetts |
25% |
75% |
44% |
56% |
|
Michigan |
18% |
82% |
29% |
71% |
|
Minnesota |
37% |
63% |
14% |
86% |
|
Mississippi |
9% |
91% |
14% |
86% |
|
Missouri |
12% |
88% |
17% |
83% |
|
Montana |
9% |
91% |
4% |
96% |
|
Nebraska |
10% |
90% |
14% |
86% |
|
Nevada |
20% |
80% |
25% |
75% |
|
New Hampshire |
22% |
78% |
34% |
66% |
|
New Jersey |
16% |
84% |
31% |
69% |
|
New Mexico |
50% |
50% |
67% |
33% |
|
New York |
8% |
92% |
15% |
85% |
|
North Carolina |
10% |
90% |
21% |
79% |
|
North Dakota |
19% |
81% |
34% |
66% |
|
Ohio |
10% |
90% |
15% |
85% |
|
Oklahoma |
14% |
86% |
19% |
81% |
|
Oregon |
8% |
92% |
12% |
88% |
|
Pennsylvania |
28% |
72% |
47% |
53% |
|
Rhode Island |
16% |
84% |
31% |
69% |
|
South Carolina |
14% |
86% |
27% |
74% |
|
South Dakota |
7% |
93% |
14% |
86% |
|
Tennessee |
23% |
78% |
32% |
68% |
|
Texas |
13% |
87% |
12% |
88% |
|
Utah |
12% |
88% |
13% |
87% |
|
Vermont |
15% |
85% |
32% |
68% |
|
Virginia |
17% |
83% |
26% |
74% |
|
Washington |
14% |
86% |
8% |
92% |
|
West Virginia |
18% |
82% |
32% |
68% |
|
Wisconsin |
16% |
84% |
33% |
68% |
|
Wyoming |
10% |
90% |
10% |
90% |
|
National |
15% |
85% |
25% |
76% |
*Due to rounding, some totals may not equal 100 percent.
[15] Sales arrests refer to arrests for manufacturing, sales, importation and other drug distribution activities. Possession of drugs with intent to sell is usually considered a trafficking or sales offense as it is closely involved with distribution. The UCR Program does notspecify, however, and therefore we do not know, whether some agencies counted possession with intent arrests as possession arrests.
[16] The growing proportion of possession arrests in great part reflects the growing proportion of marijuana possession arrests. Ryan S. King and Marc Mauer, The Sentencing Project, "The War on Marijuana: The Transformation of the War on Drugs in the 1990s," May 2005, http://www.drugpolicy.org/docUploads/nymmj_waronmj.pdf (accessed January 12, 2009).
[17] See the arrest tables for drug violations included in the annual FBI "Crime in the United States" reports. The tables include statistics by region, which can vary considerably. For example, while marijuana possession arrests accounted for 42.1 percent of all drug arrests in 2007, in the Midwest, they accounted for 53.1 percent and in the West, they accounted for 29.6 percent. FBI, "Crime in the United States, 2007."
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Ma.gnolia
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati