The Killing Ground: A Journey to Rwanda
Monday, January 30, 1995
by Mike Farrell (*)
This morning we're to meet with the UNHCR Representative for
Tanzania, a Mr. Kolude Doheny. After a bit of confusion
regarding schedules, we're ushered into his office by his
Deputy, Lloyd Dakin. Mr. Doheny is a tall, powerfully
built, extremely handsome Nigerian man with a rich, deep
voice who emanates a sense of comfort and capability.
He says that in the beginning the strategy in terms of
dealing with the refugees was to use what they themselves
presented as a natural order. That being the case, "within
four days we could feed them." The issue of the
atrocities and the responsibility for them came later.
The Benaco refugees came in earlier than did those in Goma
and were either not, or perhaps were less obviously, members
of the military. Initially, at any rate, there were fewer
members of the military and militias. The fact that it was
such a huge group (200,000 in one day) was alleviated to
some degree by their level of organization.
As to the question of how to deal with the atrocities -
first of all we must define what an atrocity is. Next we
have to decide if we have the right to withhold assistance
from hungry and needy people even if we know they are guilty
of such behavior.
Then, how do we maintain security for our own staff if we
are part of the process of passing judgment against them?
The issue is one of time. The dilemma is what to do and how
to facilitate it.
Once moves are made against the leaders, architects and
murderers, the relief effort must cease.
There is also the question of the effectiveness of the
International Tribunal.
An example of the difficulty faced is that of the identified
criminal who was turned over to and arrested by the
Tanzanian authorities, only to be released by them because
he had not committed a crime in Tanzania. When he returned
UNHCR told him he had to leave, but within two hours he had
organized a mob that threatened the lives of all the
expatriate staff (this is obviously the story Maureen told
us, but with a prologue I hadn't heard).
It will take time. Things must be sorted out by the
international community. Now, in the camps (some of the
smaller ones), people are selecting their own leadership and
perhaps new, untainted leaders are emerging.
The process involves the refugee population getting better
and more beneficially organized and getting to know the
relief organizations better.
What are our choices? We can take away their food. We can
eliminate their leaders by introducing troops for security.
It will have to be done gradually and it will take time.
And there are political problems. The RPF is in control in
Rwanda, but the majority of the people support the MRND (the
old government).
Even if food support stopped, the refugee population would
probably stay in the Benaco/Ngara area. Goma may, however,
be a different story.
The reality is that we will probably have refugees in
Tanzania for 2 to 3 years. The government here hopes they
will be gone within 6 months (this is an election year - the
first multi-party election).
Tanzania has seen refugees from Mozambique and Burundi in
the past, many of whom have stayed here and become
self-sufficient. That is not an option now because of the
new political reality faced by this government: "the
desperate circumstances of the population as compared to the
desperate circumstances of the refugee."
For Tanzania, the question is, why not establish safe areas
in Rwanda for people to return to? The problem is that the
host country doesn't want them and the people fear going
home.
200,000 Tutsis are returning to Rwanda from Uganda who have
never lived there. "How do they live?" There are so
many empty houses, so many empty tracts of land, that those
from the early years of the diaspora say "we are claiming
what is ours." This, then, is the problem faced by
the Hutu who want to return.
Tanzania, on the other hand, has itself gone through a
virtual revolution since Nyerere's time. His attitude was,
"The refugee is not a foreigner, but a guest in need." "He
was very strong on humanitarian issues, but not so good on
economics."
Citizenship was made available to refugees through a
naturalization process. Land was given. It was a society
based on humanitarian principles. Now, the economic impact
on the average Tanzanian may be changing the dynamic to the
point that this will no longer be possible.
Q. - What is the message we should take to the US?
A. - Refugees are 70% women and children. Refugees want to
go back home. Politics and economics create complications.
Time is essential to find a solution, to find a way to sort
out and deal with the minority within. That problem is the
job of the international community.
"Not caring is not an option."
"Repatriation will take place when everything else is
settled."
Q. - What about when a refugee population includes elements
whose tactics continue to destabilize the politics of the
country of origin?
A. - That becomes a problem for the host country to resolve.
We take our leave of Mr. Doheny and head out. Having had
such good luck with the Indian food last night, we decide to
try another Indian restaurant that is owned by the same
people. It's a bit more up-scale and the food is just as
good as the other. Not better.
Back to the hotel, we're left with some time on our hands
before heading to the airport tonight for the flight out.
Is it possible that we're going home? That the life we've
known is waiting at the other end of the magic carpet ride?
Hard to take in, after all this.
Everyone has last minute things to take care of. Roaming
the city for a while, hoping I'll be able to find something
to take home to Shelley and other loved ones, I turn up
nothing but an oppressive sense of dirt, haste and crumbling
facade.
It's with an enormous feeling of relief - and the
uncomfortable sense of dislocation and guilt associated with
the ability to simply be able to pick up and go home - that
we go to the airport. After checking in, paying our exit
tax and going through security, we're offered the luxury of
the first class lounge, where cool, fresh bottled water and
other drinks are made available. There's something insane
about a world where the experiences of the past week are so
conveniently juxtaposed.
The next day and a half are a blur -
to Tuesday, January 31, 1995
|